Analysis of cement leakage into the spinal canal in kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

Bone ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S456
Author(s):  
Huilin Yang ◽  
Genlin Wang ◽  
Zhaoming Zheng ◽  
Bin Meng
Keyword(s):  
Spinal Canal ◽  
Cement Leakage ◽  
Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Compression Fractures

scholarly journals Comparison Between Percutaneous Kyphoplasty And Percutaneous Vertebroplasty In Terms of The Efficacy For Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hai-Tao Zhu ◽  
De-Gang Ding ◽  
Shui Wang ◽  
Yu-Long Zhu
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Cement Leakage ◽  
Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Compression Fractures ◽  
Beneficial Effects ◽  
Radiographic Outcomes ◽  
Vas Scores

Abstract Background & Aim: Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are acknowledged as common occurred fractures among humans, especially for the elderly population. The minimally invasive percutaneous methods such as kyphoplasty as well as vertebroplasty have been valid and effective tools in terms of reducing clinical problems, which are associated with more beneficial effects as compared to traditional methods such as open surgery or conservative treatment. Hence, we conducted the current meta-analysis in order to gather updated evidence available for the systematical assessment of the clinical and radiographic outcomes of VP in comparison of KP.Methods: Publications on comparison kyphoplasty versus vertebroplasty in treatment of OVCFs were collected. After rigorous and thorough review of quality, we extracted the data on the basis of eligible trials, which analyzed the summary hazard ratios (HRs) of the endpoints of interested.Results: Totally, our inclusion criteria involved five studies. 561subjects involving 334 patients received VP and 227 patients received KP were included, of which patients receiving KP or VP failed to show any significant differences in the visual analog scale (VAS) scores (MD =-0.02, 95% CI -0.40 – 0.35; P = 0.91),and the risk of cement leakage (OR =1.60, 95% CI 0.82 – 3.12; P = 0.17). Nevertheless, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores (MD =-1.56, 95% CI -2.39 – -0.73; P = 0.0002), the injected cement volume (MD =-0.40, 95% CI -0.77 – -0.04; P = 0.03) and the operation time (MD =-9.67, 95% CI -11.55 – -7.80; P ＜0.00001) in VP group were linked to markedly lower trend in comparison of KP group with significant statistical difference.Conclusion: The present meta-analysis controls the acceptable level of the efficacy across the involved trials. The VP had ODI scores, the injected cement volume and the operation time exerted several advantages in this meta-analysis. Yet, VP failed to show benefits in terms of the VAS scores and cement leakage in comparison of KP therapy. Given the combined results of our study, the optimal treatment for patient harboring OVCFs should be determined by further high-quality and multi-center RCTs along with longer follow-ups as well as larger sample size.

scholarly journals A case of multilevel percutaneous vertebroplasty for vertebral metastases resulting in temporary paraparesis

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 030006051983508
Author(s):  
Guan Shi ◽  
Fei Feng ◽  
Chen Hao ◽  
Jia Pu ◽  
Bao Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Cement ◽  
Percutaneous Vertebroplasty ◽  
Cement Leakage ◽  
Spinal Nerve ◽  
Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Vertebral Metastases ◽  
Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Invasive Treatment ◽  
Compression Fractures ◽  
Cord Injury

Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) is a minimally invasive treatment that has been widely used for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and vertebral tumors. However, the maximum number of vertebral segments treated in a single PVP remains controversial. Furthermore, PVP may cause complications, including cement leakage, pulmonary embolism, bone cement toxicity, and spinal nerve-puncture injury. We report the rare case of a patient who underwent multilevel PVP for vertebral metastases, with no bone cement leakage or spinal cord injury, but who developed temporary paraparesis.

scholarly journals Analysis of two minimally invasive procedures for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with intravertebral cleft: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongyu Wei ◽  
Chunke Dong ◽  
Yuting Zhu ◽  
Haoning Ma
Keyword(s):  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Cement Leakage ◽  
Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Vertebral Height ◽  
Compression Fractures ◽  
Short And Long Term

Abstract Background A systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the pros and cons of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) versus kyphoplasty (PKP) for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) with intravertebral cleft (IVC) including all available evidence from controlled trials. Methods Databases including Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Wanfang Data were searched to identify relevant studies comparing PVP and PKP for OVCFs with IVC. The outcomes mainly included visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), local kyphotic angle (LKA), rate of vertebral height (VH%), and adverse events. Results Nine studies enrolling 688 patients were eligible for meta-analysis. The results indicated no significant differences between the two groups in the short-and long-term VAS, ODI, LKA, or VH% (P > 0.05). Compared with PVP, PKP was associated with significantly longer operation time (P < 0.05), higher cost (P > 0.05), and more injected cement volume (P < 0.05). In terms of adverse events, PKP has a lower risk of cement leakage (P < 0.05), while with no significant difference in adjacent-level fracture rates (P > 0.05). Conclusion The two procedures have similar short- and long-term pain relief, functional recovery, local kyphosis correction, and vertebral height maintenance in OVCFs with IVC. PKP is superior to PVP for the injected cement volume, and lower cement leakage rate, however, with longer operation time, more fluoroscopy times, and higher cost. Further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) should be conducted to confirm these results.

scholarly journals Unilateral curved versus bipedicular vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures

BMC Surgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Zhong ◽  
Jianheng Liu ◽  
Runsheng Wang ◽  
Yihao Liu ◽  
Binbin Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Compression Fracture ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Cement Leakage ◽  
Leakage Rate ◽  
Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Compression Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
Postoperative Improvement

Abstract Background Vertebral compression fracture is one of the most common complications of osteoporosis. In this study an unilateral curved vertebroplasty device was developed, and the safety, effectiveness, and surgical parameters of curved vertebroplasty (CVP) in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures was investigated and compared with traditional bipedicular vertebroplasty (BVP). Methods We investigated 104 vertebral augmentation procedures performed over 36 months. CVP and BVP procedures were compared for baseline clinical variables, pain relief (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), disability improvement (Oswestry Disability Index, ODI), operation time, number of fluoroscopic images, volume of cement per level, and cement leakage rate for each level treated. Complications and refracture incidence were also recorded in the two groups. Results The VAS and ODI in both group had no significant difference preoperative (P > 0.05), and a significant postoperative improvement in the VAS scores and ODI was found in both group (P < 0.001). However, the CVP group had significantly lower operation time, number of fluoroscopic images, and cement leakage rate per level than the BVP group (P < 0.05); however, the volumes of cement per level were similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). Neither group had any serious complications. Five and two patients in the BVP group developed refractures at non-adjacent and adjacent levels, respectively, with one patient developing refractures twice; however, none of the patients in the CVP group developed refractures at any level. Conclusions Our findings revealed that both CVP and BVP were safe and effective treatments for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, and CVP entails a shorter operation time, less exposure to fluoroscopy, and lower rate of cement leakage.

scholarly journals Vesselplasty versus vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with posterior wall rupture

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (12) ◽  
pp. 030006052110663
Author(s):  
Kai Xu ◽  
Ya-Ling Li ◽  
Song-Hua Xiao
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Bone Cement ◽  
Spinal Canal ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Posterior Wall ◽  
Cement Leakage ◽  
Leakage Rate ◽  
Vertebral Compression Fractures ◽  
Compression Fractures ◽  
Osteoporotic Compression Fractures

Objective This study was performed to compare the effectiveness and safety of vesselplasty versus vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures with posterior wall rupture. Methods Patients who underwent treatment of a single osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture with posterior wall rupture from January 2016 to February 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into a vesselplasty group (n = 17) and a vertebroplasty group (n = 43). Pain relief, radiographic outcomes, and bone cement leakage were compared between the two groups. Results There were no significant differences in the operation time, postoperative pain relief, vertebral compression recovery, or local Cobb angle improvement between the two groups. However, the overall bone cement leakage rate (29.4% vs. 67.4%) and spinal canal leakage rate (0.0% vs. 30.2%) were significantly lower in the vesselplasty group than vertebroplasty group. Conclusions Vesselplasty offers similar pain relief and vertebral compression recovery but lower spinal canal leakage compared with vertebroplasty. Vesselplasty is thus a better option than vertebroplasty for patients with osteoporotic compression fractures with posterior wall rupture.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document