The anaphylatoxin receptor C5AR is expressed in bone cells in vitro and during fracture healing in vivo

Bone ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. S104
Author(s):  
A. Ignatius ◽  
A. Liedert ◽  
P. Schoengraf ◽  
R. Brenner ◽  
C. Ehrnthaller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Healing ◽  
Bone Cells

scholarly journals OP0244 A PRECLINICAL TESTING TOOL: THE IN VITRO 3D FRACTURE GAP MODEL

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 154.1-154
Author(s):  
M. Pfeiffenberger ◽  
A. Damerau ◽  
P. Hoff ◽  
A. Lang ◽  
F. Buttgereit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Healing ◽  
Bone Healing ◽  
Inflammatory Markers ◽  
Initial Phase ◽  
Gap Model ◽  
Osteogenic Markers ◽  
Immunosuppressed Patients ◽  
The Impact

Background:Approximately 10% of fractures lead to significant fracture healing disorders, with a tendency to further increase due to the aging population. Of note, especially immunosuppressed patients with ongoing inflammation show difficulties in the correct course of fracture healing leading to fracture healing disorders. Most notably, invading immune cells and secreted cytokines are considered to provide an inflammatory microenvironment within the fracture gap, primarily during the initial phase of fracture healing. Current research has the focus on small animal models, facing the problem of translation towards the human system. In order to improve the therapy of fracture healing disorders, we have developed a human cell-basedin vitromodel to mimic the initial phase of fracture healing adequately. This model will be used for the development of new therapeutic strategies.Objectives:Our aim is to develop anin vitro3D fracture gap model (FG model) which mimics thein vivosituation in order to provide a reliable preclinical test system for fracture healing disorders.Methods:To assemble our FG model, we co-cultivated coagulated peripheral blood and primary human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) mimicking the fracture hematoma (FH model) together with a scaffold-free bone-like construct mimicking the bony part of the fracture gap for 48 h under hypoxic conditions (n=3), in order to reflect thein vivosituation after fracture most adequately. To analyze the impact of the bone-like construct on thein vitroFH model with regard to its osteogenic induction capacity, we cultivated the fracture gap models in either medium with or without osteogenic supplements. To analyze the impact of Deferoxamine (DFO, known to foster fracture healing) on the FG model, we further treated our FG models with either 250 µmol DFO or left them untreated. After incubation and subsequent preparation of the fracture hematomas, we evaluated gene expression of osteogenic (RUNX2,SPP1), angiogenic (VEGF,IL8), inflammatory markers (IL6,IL8) and markers for the adaptation towards hypoxia (LDHA,PGK1) as well as secretion of cytokines/chemokines using quantitative PCR and multiplex suspension assay, respectively.Results:We found via histology that both the fracture hematoma model and the bone-like construct had close contact during the incubation, allowing the cells to interact with each other through direct cell-cell contact, signal molecules or metabolites. Additionally, we could show that the bone-like constructs induced the upregulation of osteogenic markers (RUNX2, SPP1) within the FH models irrespective of the supplementation of osteogenic supplements. Furthermore, we observed an upregulation of hypoxia-related, angiogenic and osteogenic markers (RUNX2,SPP1) under the influence of DFO, and the downregulation of inflammatory markers (IL6,IL8) as compared to the untreated control. The latter was also confirmed on protein level (e.g. IL-6 and IL-8). Within the bone-like constructs, we observed an upregulation of angiogenic markers (RNA-expression ofVEGF,IL8), even more pronounced under the treatment of DFO.Conclusion:In summary, our findings demonstrate that our establishedin vitroFG model provides all osteogenic cues to induce the initial bone healing process, which could be enhanced by the fracture-healing promoting substance DFO. Therefore, we conclude that our model is indeed able to mimic correctly the human fracture gap situation and is therefore suitable to study the influence and efficacy of potential therapeutics for the treatment of bone healing disorders in immunosuppressed patients with ongoing inflammation.Disclosure of Interests:Moritz Pfeiffenberger: None declared, Alexandra Damerau: None declared, Paula Hoff: None declared, Annemarie Lang: None declared, Frank Buttgereit Grant/research support from: Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Generic Assays, GSK, Hexal, Horizon, Lilly, medac, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi., Timo Gaber: None declared

scholarly journals Matrix Vesicles: Role in Bone Mineralization and Potential Use as Therapeutics

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 289
Author(s):  
Sana Ansari ◽  
Bregje W. M. de de Wildt ◽  
Michelle A. M. Vis ◽  
Carolina E. de de Korte ◽  
Keita Ito ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Formation ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Bone Cells ◽  
Bone Mineralization ◽  
Recipient Cell ◽  
Organic Matrix ◽  
Matrix Vesicles ◽  
Matrix Mineralization

Bone is a complex organ maintained by three main cell types: osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes. During bone formation, osteoblasts deposit a mineralized organic matrix. Evidence shows that bone cells release extracellular vesicles (EVs): nano-sized bilayer vesicles, which are involved in intercellular communication by delivering their cargoes through protein–ligand interactions or fusion to the plasma membrane of the recipient cell. Osteoblasts shed a subset of EVs known as matrix vesicles (MtVs), which contain phosphatases, calcium, and inorganic phosphate. These vesicles are believed to have a major role in matrix mineralization, and they feature bone-targeting and osteo-inductive properties. Understanding their contribution in bone formation and mineralization could help to target bone pathologies or bone regeneration using novel approaches such as stimulating MtV secretion in vivo, or the administration of in vitro or biomimetically produced MtVs. This review attempts to discuss the role of MtVs in biomineralization and their potential application for bone pathologies and bone regeneration.

TRENDS AND CHALLENGES OF CARTILAGE TISSUE ENGINEERING

2009 ◽  
Vol 21 (03) ◽  
pp. 149-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsu-Wei Fang
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Stem Cells ◽  
Growth Factors ◽  
Bone Cells ◽  
Cartilage Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bioactive Molecules ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Cartilage Tissue

Cartilage injuries may be caused by trauma, biomechanical imbalance, or degenerative changes of joint. Unfortunately, cartilage has limited capability to spontaneous repair once damaged and may lead to progressive damage and degeneration. Cartilage tissue-engineering techniques have emerged as the potential clinical strategies. An ideal tissue-engineering approach to cartilage repair should offer good integration into both the host cartilage and the subchondral bone. Cells, scaffolds, and growth factors make up the tissue engineering triad. One of the major challenges for cartilage tissue engineering is cell source and cell numbers. Due to the limitations of proliferation for mature chondrocytes, current studies have alternated to use stem cells as a potential source. In the recent years, a lot of novel biomaterials has been continuously developed and investigated in various in vitro and in vivo studies for cartilage tissue engineering. Moreover, stimulatory factors such as bioactive molecules have been explored to induce or enhance cartilage formation. Growth factors and other additives could be added into culture media in vitro, transferred into cells, or incorporated into scaffolds for in vivo delivery to promote cellular differentiation and tissue regeneration.Based on the current development of cartilage tissue engineering, there exist challenges to overcome. How to manipulate the interactions between cells, scaffold, and signals to achieve the moderation of implanted composite differentiate into moderate stem cells to differentiate into hyaline cartilage to perform the optimum physiological and biomechanical functions without negative side effects remains the target to pursue.

scholarly journals Protocol of Co-Culture of Human Osteoblasts and Osteoclasts to Test Biomaterials for Bone Tissue Engineering

2022 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Giorgia Borciani ◽  
Giorgia Montalbano ◽  
Nicola Baldini ◽  
Chiara Vitale-Brovarone ◽  
Gabriela Ciapetti
Keyword(s):  
Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue Engineering ◽  
Bone Tissue ◽  
Bone Cells ◽  
Bone Cell ◽  
Seeding Density ◽  
Bone Homeostasis ◽  
Bone Microenvironment

New biomaterials and scaffolds for bone tissue engineering (BTE) applications require to be tested in a bone microenvironment reliable model. On this assumption, the in vitro laboratory protocols with bone cells represent worthy experimental systems improving our knowledge about bone homeostasis, reducing the costs of experimentation. To this day, several models of the bone microenvironment are reported in the literature, but few delineate a protocol for testing new biomaterials using bone cells. Herein we propose a clear protocol to set up an indirect co-culture system of human-derived osteoblasts and osteoclast precursors, providing well-defined criteria such as the cell seeding density, cell:cell ratio, the culture medium, and the proofs of differentiation. The material to be tested may be easily introduced in the system and the cell response analyzed. The physical separation of osteoblasts and osteoclasts allows distinguishing the effects of the material onto the two cell types and to evaluate the correlation between material and cell behavior, cell morphology, and adhesion. The whole protocol requires about 4 to 6 weeks with an intermediate level of expertise. The system is an in vitro model of the bone remodeling system useful in testing innovative materials for bone regeneration, and potentially exploitable in different application fields. The use of human primary cells represents a close replica of the bone cell cooperation in vivo and may be employed as a feasible system to test materials and scaffolds for bone substitution and regeneration.

scholarly journals Increased Bone Mass in Mice Lacking the Adipokine Apelin

Endocrinology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 154 (6) ◽  
pp. 2069-2080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lalita Wattanachanya ◽  
Wei-Dar Lu ◽  
Ramendra K. Kundu ◽  
Liping Wang ◽  
Marcia J. Abbott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Mass ◽  
Bone Cells ◽  
Physiological Role ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Maximum Effect ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Primary Mouse ◽  
Skeletal Homeostasis

Abstract Adipose tissue plays an important role in skeletal homeostasis, and there is interest in identifying adipokines that influence bone mass. One such adipokine may be apelin, a ligand for the Gi-G protein-coupled receptor APJ, which has been reported to enhance mitogenesis and suppress apoptosis in MC3T3-E1 cells and primary human osteoblasts (OBs). However, it is unclear whether apelin plays a physiological role in regulating skeletal homeostasis in vivo. In this study, we compared the skeletal phenotypes of apelin knockout (APKO) and wild-type mice and investigated the direct effects of apelin on bone cells in vitro. The increased fractional cancellous bone volume at the distal femur was observed in APKO mice of both genders at 12 weeks of age and persisted until the age of 20. Cortical bone perimeter at the femoral midshaft was significantly increased in males and females at both time points. Dynamic histomorphometry revealed that APKO mice had increased rates of bone formation and mineral apposition, with evidences of accelerated OB proliferation and differentiation, without significant alteration in osteoclast activity. An in vitro study showed that apelin increased proliferation of primary mouse OBs as well as suppressed apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner with the maximum effect at 5nM. However, it had no effect on the formation of mineralized nodules. We did not observed significantly altered in osteoclast parameters in vitro. Taken together, the increased bone mass in mice lacking apelin suggested complex direct and paracrine/endocrine effects of apelin on bone, possibly via modulating insulin sensitivity. These results indicate that apelin functions as a physiologically significant antianabolic factor in bone in vivo.

Fabrication of amorphous strontium polyphosphate microparticles that induce mineralization of bone cells in vitro and in vivo

2017 ◽  
Vol 50 ◽  
pp. 89-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Werner E.G. Müller ◽  
Emad Tolba ◽  
Maximilian Ackermann ◽  
Meik Neufurth ◽  
Shunfeng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Cells

scholarly journals Guhong Injection promotes fracture healing by activating Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway in vivo and in vitro

2019 ◽  
Vol 120 ◽  
pp. 109436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhizhen Sun ◽  
Hongting Jin ◽  
Huifen Zhou ◽  
Li Yu ◽  
Haitong Wan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Healing ◽  
Signaling Pathway ◽  
Beta Catenin

scholarly journals TXNIP is highly regulated in bone biopsies from patients with endogenous Cushing's syndrome and related to bone turnover

2012 ◽  
Vol 166 (6) ◽  
pp. 1039-1048 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tove Lekva ◽  
Thor Ueland ◽  
Hege Bøyum ◽  
Johan Arild Evang ◽  
Kristin Godang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Cushing’S Syndrome ◽  
Bone Cells ◽  
Cushing's Syndrome ◽  
Gene Encoding ◽  
Osteoclast Activity ◽  
Bone Biopsies ◽  
Before And After

ObjectivePatients with endogenous Cushing's Syndrome (CS), as long-time treated patients with exogenous glucocorticoids (GCs), have severe systemic manifestations including secondary osteoporosis and low-energy fractures. The aim of the present study was to investigate the functional role ofTXNIPin bone with focus on osteoblast (OB) differentiation and OB-mediated osteoclast activity and functionin vitro.Design and methodsNine bone biopsies from CS before and after surgical treatment were screened for expressional candidate genes. Microarray analyses revealed that the gene encodingTXNIPranked among the most upregulated genes. Subsequentin vitroandin vivostudies were performed.ResultsWe found thatTXNIPgene in bone is downregulated in CS following surgical treatment. Furthermore, ourin vivodata indicate novel associations between thioredoxin andTXNIP. Ourin vitrostudies showed that silencingTXNIPin OBs was followed by increased differentiation and expression and secretion of osteocalcin as well as enhanced activity of alkaline phosphatase. Moreover, treating osteoclasts with silenced TXNIP OB media showed an increased osteoclast activity.ConclusionsTXNIPexpression in bone is highly regulated during the treatment of active CS, and by GC in bone cellsin vitro. Our data indicate that TXNIP may mediate some of the detrimental effects of GC on OB function as well as modulate OB-mediated osteoclastogenesis by regulating the OPG/RANKL ratio.

Control of Oriented Extracellular Matrix Similar to Anisotropic Bone Microstructure

2014 ◽  
Vol 783-786 ◽  
pp. 72-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayoshi Nakano ◽  
Aira Matsugaki ◽  
Takuya Ishimoto ◽  
Mitsuharu Todai ◽  
Ai Serizawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Extracellular Matrix ◽  
Bone Tissue ◽  
Bone Cells ◽  
Crystal Surface ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Bone Microstructure ◽  
Bone Cell ◽  
Collagen Fibers

Bone microstructure is dominantly composed of anisotropic extracellular matrix (ECM) in which collagen fibers and epitaxially-oriented biological apatite (BAp) crystals are preferentially aligned depending on the bone anatomical position, resulting in exerting appropriate mechanical function. The regenerative bone in bony defects is however produced without the preferential alignment of collagen fibers and the c-axis of BAp crystals, and subsequently reproduced to recover toward intact alignment. Thus, it is necessary to produce the anisotropic bone-mimetic tissue for the quick recovery of original bone tissue and the related mechanical ability in the early stage of bone regeneration. Our group is focusing on the methodology for regulating the arrangement of bone cells, the following secretion of collagen and the self-assembled mineralization by oriented BAp crystallites. Cyclic stretching in vitro to bone cells, principal-stress loading in vivo on scaffolds, step formation by slip traces on Ti single crystal, surface modification by laser induced periodic surface structure (LIPSS), anisotropic collagen substrate with the different degree of orientation, etc. can dominate bone cell arrangement and lead to the construction of the oriented ECM similar to the bone tissue architecture. This suggests that stress/strain loading, surface topography and chemical anisotropy are useful to produce bone-like microstructure in order to promote the regeneration of anisotropic bone tissue and to understand the controlling parameters for anisotropic osteogenesis induction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document