An analysis of 1361 aesthetic procedures from 2000 to 2005 in a large regional plastic surgery unit: implications for cosmetic surgery training

2007 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 437-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iain S. Whitaker ◽  
Lyndon Mason ◽  
D.E. Boyce ◽  
M.A.C.S. Cooper
Keyword(s):  
Plastic Surgery ◽  
Cosmetic Surgery ◽  
Surgery Training ◽  
Aesthetic Procedures

scholarly journals Aesthetic Surgery Training during Residency in the United States: A Comparison of the Integrated, Combined, and Independent Training Models

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arash Momeni ◽  
Rebecca Y. Kim ◽  
Derrick C. Wan ◽  
Ali Izadpanah ◽  
Gordon K. Lee
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Plastic Surgery ◽  
Cosmetic Surgery ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Aesthetic Surgery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Surgery Training ◽  
Aesthetic Procedures

Background. Three educational models for plastic surgery training exist in the United States, the integrated, combined, and independent model. The present study is a comparative analysis of aesthetic surgery training, to assess whether one model is particularly suitable to provide for high-quality training in aesthetic surgery. Methods. An 18-item online survey was developed to assess residents’ perceptions regarding the quality of training in aesthetic surgery in the US. The survey had three distinct sections: demographic information, current state of aesthetic surgery training, and residents’ perception regarding the quality of aesthetic surgery training. Results. A total of 86 senior plastic surgery residents completed the survey. Twenty-three, 24, and 39 residents were in integrated, combined, and independent residency programs, respectively. No statistically significant differences were seen with respect to number of aesthetic surgery procedures performed, additional training received in minimal-invasive cosmetic procedures, median level of confidence with index cosmetic surgery procedures, or perceived quality of aesthetic surgery training. Facial aesthetic procedures were felt to be the most challenging procedures. Exposure to minimally invasive aesthetic procedures was limited. Conclusion. While the educational experience in aesthetic surgery appears to be similar, weaknesses still exist with respect to training in minimally invasive/nonsurgical aesthetic procedures.

Cosmetic Surgery: A Subspecialty That Needs Specialized Training and Recognition

2021 ◽  
pp. 074880682110518
Author(s):  
Kamran Dastoury ◽  
Jacob Haiavy ◽  
Jane Petro ◽  
Martha Ayewah
Keyword(s):  
American Academy ◽  
Plastic Surgery ◽  
Cosmetic Surgery ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Aesthetic Surgery ◽  
Fellowship Training ◽  
Subspecialty Training ◽  
Plastic And Reconstructive Surgery ◽  
Surgery Training ◽  
American Society

Introduction: This study was performed to provide a comprehensive review of the breadth and depth of fellowship training provided by the American Academy of Cosmetic Surgery (AACS), with direct comparison with other current aesthetic surgery training programs available in the United States. We hypothesized that this subspecialty training provides essential experience and confidence to perform aesthetic procedures, which are likely not adequately imparted during traditional residency training. We also address the notion that Cosmetic Surgery is not under the sole ownership of one specialty, but rather a subspecialty that flourishes by collaboration between multidisciplinary surgical backgrounds. Materials and Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study of survey data from 2 distinct groups—current fellows in a 1-year AACS program and surgeons who completed an AACS fellowship between July 2008 and June 2017, who have been in active cosmetic surgery practice ranging from 6 months to over 6 years. A survey was administered via email and distributed by the AACS central office. The responses were compared with data published in the Annals of Plastic Surgery concerning Recent Trends in Resident Career Choices after Plastic Surgery Training. Results: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) requirements for aesthetic surgical cases in a 6-year Plastic Surgery program are 150 cases, but 50% of graduating seniors feel inadequately prepared to transition straight into aesthetic surgery practice, whereas among AACS graduating fellows, 100% feel very prepared to go on the aesthetic surgery practice, having completed an average of 687 cases within the yearlong training program. We note that the survey response rate was 81% among current fellows versus 35% among practicing surgeons. Discussion: We believe that focused subspecialty training in cosmetic surgery after completion of a primary surgical residency in a form of a structured fellowship through AACS, American Society of Plastic Surgery, American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Commission on Dental Accreditation, and American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (Oculoplastic) is the ideal preparation for the future. As we learn from each other through fellowship training, academic conferences, and research, this will further advance the subspecialty and ultimately improve patient care and outcomes. There is no evidence that these training programs provide less adequate preparation, although they are not accredited by the ACGME. To the contrary, the additional experience and knowledge gained during these fellowship training programs result in better outcomes and more competent practitioners. Conclusions: The development of subspecialty training and board certification for surgeons committed to cosmetic surgery yields the highest level of qualified providers. The diverse backgrounds of these providers continue to allow us to expand and innovate in this field. This study is aimed at moving this conversation forward in a positive direction.

scholarly journals Graduate perception of cosmetic surgery training in plastic surgery residency and fellowship programs

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-77
Author(s):  
Ledibabari Mildred Ngaage ◽  
Cecelia J Kim ◽  
Chelsea Harris ◽  
Colton HL McNichols ◽  
Chinezimuzo Ihenatu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plastic Surgery ◽  
Cosmetic Surgery ◽  
Surgery Training ◽  
Fellowship Programs

A Survey of Cosmetic Surgery Training in Plastic Surgery Programs in the United States

2008 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 1570-1578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin M. Morrison ◽  
S Cristina Rotemberg ◽  
Andrea Moreira-Gonzalez ◽  
James E. Zins
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Plastic Surgery ◽  
Cosmetic Surgery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Surgery Training

scholarly journals Cosmetic Surgery Training in Canadian Plastic Surgery Residencies: Are We Training Competent Surgeons?

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 160-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. J. Chivers ◽  
J. Ahmad ◽  
F. Lista ◽  
R. J. Warren ◽  
A. Y. Arkoubi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plastic Surgery ◽  
Cosmetic Surgery ◽  
Surgery Training

An analysis of the cosmetic surgery experience acquired through UK plastic surgery training

2018 ◽  
Vol 71 (11) ◽  
pp. 1532-1538 ◽  
Author(s):  
N.M. Pantelides ◽  
L. Highton ◽  
A. Lamb ◽  
P. Foden ◽  
R.I.S. Winterton
Keyword(s):  
Plastic Surgery ◽  
Cosmetic Surgery ◽  
Surgery Training

scholarly journals Cosmetic Surgery Training in Plastic Surgery Residency Programs

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. e1491 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colton H. L. McNichols ◽  
Silviu Diaconu ◽  
Sara Alfadil ◽  
Jhade Woodall ◽  
Michael Grant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plastic Surgery ◽  
Cosmetic Surgery ◽  
Residency Programs ◽  
Surgery Training

Aesthetically Thriving through Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): An Evaluation of Patient Motivation and Perception on Aesthetic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Procedures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Billur Sezgin ◽  
Sedat Tatar ◽  
Basak Selin Kara ◽  
Selahattin Ozmen ◽  
Reha Yavuzer
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Plastic Surgery ◽  
Cosmetic Surgery ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Aesthetic Surgery ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Minimally Invasive Procedures ◽  
Invasive Procedures ◽  
Patient Motivation ◽  
Aesthetic Procedures

AbstractAlthough the cancellation of elective procedures due to the COVID-19 outbreak has been a vital precaution, it has resulted in the suspension of aesthetic procedures and surgeries worldwide. Consequently, this postponement and other factors might have a negative impact on patients planning to undergo aesthetic procedures. Understanding the changes in patient motivation and perception in comparison to the prepandemic period is imperative for proper adjustment of plastic surgery clinics.A prospective questionnaire study was conducted on patients with cancelled aesthetic surgeries or procedures to determine the effects that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) had on patient motivation regarding cosmetic surgery and procedures and to establish a relationship between patient characteristics and the overall effect of pandemia on the perception of cosmetic surgery.Although most patients felt angry or frustrated due to the cancellation of their surgeries or procedures, the majority accepted that it was a necessary precaution. Patients with a history of previous minimally invasive procedures had a significantly higher ratio of acceptance for cancellations, whereas single patients were more likely to want to have their treatments done if the decision were left up to them. A subset of patients considered undergoing additional cosmetic procedures in the setting of self-isolation, and all patients stated that they would reschedule once the pandemia was under control.Patients with established motivation for plastic surgery and minimally invasive procedures ultimately plan to resume their normal treatments alongside others after the pandemia subsides. Plastic surgeons must actively communicate with their patient population during this time to properly educate, embrace, and direct them under scientific guidelines.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document