scholarly journals The Economic and Health Utilization Cost of Clinically Significant Cytomegalovirus Infection Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. S333-S334
Author(s):  
Michelle Yong ◽  
Shio Yen Tio ◽  
Jake Valentine ◽  
Joe Sasadeusz ◽  
Lynette Chui Yen Chee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cytomegalovirus Infection ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Health Utilization ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Utilization Cost

High dose valacyclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110604
Author(s):  
Kelly G Hawks ◽  
Amanda Fegley ◽  
Roy T Sabo ◽  
Catherine H Roberts ◽  
Amir A Toor
Keyword(s):  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cmv Infection ◽  
Allogeneic Hct ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Cmv Disease ◽  
Cmv Prophylaxis

Introduction Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common and clinically significant viral infections following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Currently available options for CMV prophylaxis and treatment present challenges related to side effects and cost. Methods In this retrospective medical record review, the incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (CMV disease or reactivation requiring preemptive treatment) following allogeneic HCT was compared in patients receiving valacyclovir 1 g three times daily versus acyclovir 400 mg every 12 h for viral prophylaxis. Results Forty-five patients who received valacyclovir were matched based on propensity scoring to 35 patients who received acyclovir. All patients received reduced-intensity conditioning regimens containing anti-thymocyte globulin. Clinically significant CMV infection by day + 180 was lower in the valacyclovir group compared to the acyclovir group (18% vs. 57%, p = 0.0004). Patients receiving valacyclovir prophylaxis also had less severe infection evidenced by a reduction in CMV disease, lower peak CMV titers, delayed CMV reactivation, and less secondary neutropenia. Conclusion Prospective evaluation of valacyclovir 1 g three times daily for viral prophylaxis following allogeneic HCT is warranted. Due to valacyclovir's favorable toxicity profile and affordable cost, it has the potential to benefit patients on a broad scale as an option for CMV prophylaxis.

scholarly journals Letermovir prophylaxis is effective in preventing cytomegalovirus reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: single-center real-world data

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Derigs ◽  
Aleksandar Radujkovic ◽  
Maria-Luisa Schubert ◽  
Paul Schnitzler ◽  
Tilman Schöning ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Real World ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Cytomegalovirus Reactivation ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Cmv Reactivation

AbstractMorbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) are still essentially affected by reactivation of cytomegalovirus (CMV). We evaluated 80 seropositive patients transplanted consecutively between March 2018 and March 2019 who received letermovir (LET) prophylaxis from engraftment until day +100 and retrospectively compared them with 80 patients without LET allografted between January 2017 and March 2018. The primary endpoint of this study was the cumulative incidence (CI) of clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi) defined as CMV reactivation demanding preemptive treatment or CMV disease. With 14% CI of CS-CMVi at day +100 (11 events) was significantly lower in the LET cohort when compared to the control group (33 events, 41%; HR 0.29; p < 0.001). Whereas therapy with foscarnet could be completely avoided in the LET group, 7 out of 80 patients in the control cohort received foscarnet, resulting in 151 extra in-patient days for foscarnet administration (p = 0.002). One-year overall survival was 72% in the control arm vs 84% in the LET arm (HR 0.75 [95%CI 0.43–1.30]; p < 0.306). This study confirms efficacy and safety of LET for prophylaxis of CS-CMVi after alloHCT in a real-world setting, resulting in a significant patient benefit by reducing hospitalization needs and exposure to potentially toxic antiviral drugs for treatment of CMV reactivation.

scholarly journals A Mortality Analysis of Letermovir Prophylaxis for Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in CMV-seropositive Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (8) ◽  
pp. 1525-1533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Per Ljungman ◽  
Michael Schmitt ◽  
Francisco M Marty ◽  
Johan Maertens ◽  
Roy F Chemaly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Status Data

Abstract Background In a phase 3 trial, letermovir reduced clinically significant cytomegalovirus infections (CS-CMVi) and all-cause mortality at week 24 versus placebo in CMV-seropositive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. This post hoc analysis of phase 3 data further investigated the effects of letermovir on all-cause mortality. Methods Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated by treatment group for all-cause mortality. Observations were censored at trial discontinuation for reasons other than death or at trial completion. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox modeling, adjusting for risk factors associated with mortality. Results Of 495 patients with no detectable CMV DNA at randomization, 437 had vital-status data available through week 48 post-HCT at trial completion (101 deaths, 20.4%). Following letermovir prophylaxis, the HR for all-cause mortality was 0.58 (95% CI, 0.35–0.98; P = .04) at week 24 and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.49–1.11; P = .14) at week 48 post-HCT versus placebo. Incidence of all-cause mortality through week 48 post-HCT in the letermovir group was similar in patients with or without CS-CMVi (15.8 vs 19.4%; P = .71). However, in the placebo group, all-cause mortality at week 48 post-HCT was higher in patients with versus those without CS-CMVi (31.0% vs 18.2%; P = .02). The HR for all-cause mortality in patients with CS-CMVi was 0.45 (95% CI, 0.21–1.00; P = .05) at week 48 for letermovir versus placebo. Conclusions Letermovir may reduce mortality by preventing or delaying CS-CMVi in HCT recipients. Clinical Trials Registration clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02137772.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document