scholarly journals Survivorship after Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma: Late Effects and Quality of Life

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 407-412 ◽  
Author(s):  
George E. Georges ◽  
Merav Bar ◽  
Lynn Onstad ◽  
Jean C. Yi ◽  
Mazyar Shadman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Late Effects ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

scholarly journals Long Term Quality of Life in Lymphoma Patients after Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. S27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Umar Farooq ◽  
Melissa Larson ◽  
Matthew J. Maurer ◽  
Stephen Ansell ◽  
David J. Inwards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Patients With Multiple Myeloma: Effect of Age

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 165-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binod Dhakal ◽  
Ariel Nelson ◽  
Guru Subramanian Guru Murthy ◽  
Raphael Fraser ◽  
Daniel Eastwood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Effect Of Age ◽  
Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Improved outcomes with maintenance therapy after salvage autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) in multiple myeloma: A CIBMTR study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8022-8022
Author(s):  
Oren Pasvolsky ◽  
Raphael Fraser ◽  
Noel Estrada-Merly ◽  
Moshe Yeshurun ◽  
Uri Rozovski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Maintenance Group

8022 Background: Maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma (MM) after first autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT1) is considered standard of care. Data regarding maintenance therapy after a salvage AHCT (AHCT2) in the setting of relapsed MM are scarce. Therefore, we used data from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) registry to examine the use of maintenance therapy after AHCT2 in MM patients and its effect on post-transplant patient outcomes. Methods: We included US adult MM patients who underwent AHCT2 after melphalan conditioning regimen from 2010-2018, and excluded patients who underwent tandem transplants. Outcomes of interest included non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse/progression (REL), progression-free and overall survival (PFS, OS). Cox proportional hazards models were developed to study the main effect (maintenance use) with other covariates of interest including age, sex, race, performance status, HCT-comorbidity index, MM subtype, stage, creatinine, cytogenetic, conditioning melphalan dose, disease status at transplant, and time from AHCT1 to AHCT2. Results: Of 522 patients, 342 received maintenance therapy and 180 did not after AHCT2. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Median follow up was 58 months in the maintenance group and 61.5 months in the no-maintenance group. Common maintenance regimens included immunomodulatory drugs (IMID)-lenalidomide (N = 145, 42%) or pomalidomide (N = 46, 13%) and proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib (N = 45, 13%). Univariate analysis showed superior outcomes at 5 years in maintenance compared to the no-maintenance group: NRM 2 (0.7-3.9)% vs 9.9 (5.9-14.9)%, p < 0.001, REL 70.2 (64.4-75.8)% vs 80.3 (73.6-86.3)%, p 0.003, PFS 27.8% (22.4-33.5) vs. 9.8% (5.5-15.2), p < 0.001, and OS 54% (47.5-60.5) vs 30.9% (23.2-39.2) p < 0.001, respectively. IMID-containing maintenance regimens were associated with an improved 5-year PFS and OS compared to other maintenance regimens. Use of maintenance therapy retained its association with improved outcomes in multivariate analysis, including NRM: hazard ratio (HR) 0.19 (0.08-0.44), p 0.0001, REL: HR 0.58 (0.47-0.72), p < 0.0001, PFS HR 0.52 (0.43-0.64), p < 0.0001, and OS HR 0.46 (0.36-0.60), p < 0.0001. We conducted additional analyses to investigate a possible selection bias in the maintenance group including landmark analysis at 100-days and 6-months post-AHCT2 as well as a subgroup analysis of patients who received melphalan 200mg/m2 as conditioning for AHCT2 (as a surrogate for fitness)- all these analyses also showed improved outcomes in the maintenance group. Second cancers were reported in 17 (5%) patients in the maintenance group and 6 (3%) patients and no-maintenance group (p 0.39). Conclusions: Maintenance therapy after AHCT2 is associated with superior outcomes in MM patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document