scholarly journals Autologous Vs Related Vs Unrelated Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Adults with NPM1 Mutated/FLT3-ITD Negative Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Remission: A Study from the Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the EBMT

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. S252
Author(s):  
Xavier Poiré ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Didier Blaise ◽  
Patrice Chevallier ◽  
Johan A. Maertens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Acute Leukemia ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
First Remission ◽  
Acute Myeloid

scholarly journals Comparison of the efficacy of chemotherapy and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first remission in adults

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 66-80
Author(s):  
S. N. Bondarenko ◽  
I. S. Moiseev ◽  
I. A. Samorodova ◽  
T. L. Gindina ◽  
M. A. Kucher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
First Remission ◽  
Acute Myeloid

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) and chemotherapy (CT) of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first remission (CR1), to identify factors influencing the results. We compare the efficacy alloHSCT in CR1 (n = 70) and CT (n = 52). Patients were stratified by age, the level of leucocytes, the origin of AML, cytogenetic risk group and response to induction CT. Five-years overall and disease-free survival (OS and DFS) were higher in the group alloHSCT (67 and 65 % vs 46 and 30 % (p = 0.02 and p = 0.001)). Benefits of DFS after alloHSCT was in standard and high-risk cytogenetic groups (78 % versus 29 % (p = 0.001), and 34 % vs 17 % (p = 0.007)). The risk of relapse (RR) was 24 % in patients after alloHSCT vs. 57 % for CT (p = 0.003). Comparing the RR after alloHSCT and CT depending on the cytogenetic risk groups: standard (HR0.2(CI95 %0.07 - 0.56) p = 0.002), and high (HR0.27(CI95 %0.08-0.86) p = 0.03). Additional factors affect the RR were the origin of AML (de novo) (HR0.47 (CI95 %0.3-0.74) p = 0.001), the hyperleukocytosis (HR1.91 (CI95 %1.09 - 3.32) p = 0.02), and no remission after the first course CT (HR3.32(CI95 %1.57-7.0) p = 0.002). The efficacy of alloHSCT compared with CT is higher both in standard and high-risk cytogenetic group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document