scholarly journals A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial of Cryotherapy Vs. Supersaturated Calcium Phosphate Rinses Vs. Saline Rinses for the Prevention of Oral Mucositis in Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) Receiving High-Dose Melphalan (HDM) and Autotransplantation

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. S204-S205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan J. Toro ◽  
Deanna Schneider ◽  
Rosalinda Alonzo ◽  
Abida Hasan ◽  
Shuko Lee ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Keipp Talbot ◽  
Andrew J Dunning ◽  
Corwin A Robertson ◽  
Victoria A Landolfi ◽  
David P Greenberg ◽  
...  

Abstract Passive surveillance data had signaled the possibility of gastrointestinal adverse events occurring after the administration of high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV-HD). However, in a large, prospective randomized clinical trial, rates of serious gastrointestinal events were no greater among IIV-HD recipients than among those who received a standard-dose influenza vaccine.


2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 808-815 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiri Valenta ◽  
Helena Brodska ◽  
Tomas Drabek ◽  
Jan Hendl ◽  
Antonin Kazda

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7037-7037
Author(s):  
Graziella Chagas Jaguar ◽  
Gustavo Henrique Rodrigues ◽  
Andre Guollo ◽  
Vanessa Oliveira Camandoni ◽  
Leila Maria Magalhães Pessoa Melo ◽  
...  

7037 Background: High-dose melphalan is the standard conditioning regimen for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing ASCT. However, this therapy is commonly associated with severe oral mucositis (OM). Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) has been reported as an effective method in preventing this complication. The aim of this study was to define the potential impact of OM on outcomes in patients with MM undergoing ASCT and receiving preventive LLLT. Methods: We describe a retrospective cohort of 79 consecutive patients with MM who received high-dose melphalan conditioning. All patients received prophylactic LLLT application performed daily from the beginning of the conditioning regimen up to day +2. The patients continued receiving LLLT in case of OM grade ≥ 2 until complete remission of the lesions. OM severity was assessed daily using WHO scale from the beginning of conditioning until hospital discharge. We examined the relationship between worst OM grade and clinical outcomes, including days with oral pain, days of total parenteral nutrition, days of LLLT and days with neutropenic fever. Results: Of 79 patients, 55 (69.62%) experienced OM grade 0-1, 16 (20.25%) experienced OM grade 2, 7 (8.86%) grade 3 and 1 (1.26%) grade 4. Patients with OM grade 0-2 had statistically fewer days of oral pain compared with grade 3-4 (0.88 and 6.25 days, respectively, p = 0.0001). The worst OM grade was also significantly (p < 0.05) associated with days of narcotic therapy and length of LLLT. Severe OM was not associated with febrile days or the use of parenteral nutrition. Conclusions: Severe OM is associated with worse clinical outcomes. In this transplantation setting, severe OM was not common as previously reported in literature, probably due to LLLT. Controlled randomized trials should be performed to confirm the real benefit of LLLT in this scenario as well as the pharmacogenomics and pharmacokinetic studies to better understand interpatient variability of melphalan exposure and toxicity.


2000 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1141-1146 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Vela-Ojeda ◽  
F Tripp-Villanueva ◽  
L Montiel-Cervantes ◽  
E Sánchez-Cortés ◽  
M Ayala-Sánchez ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 5022-5022
Author(s):  
Antoine Italiano ◽  
Emmanuel Chamorey ◽  
Cyril Foa ◽  
Frédéric Peyrade ◽  
Josiane Otto ◽  
...  

Abstract Autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC)- supported high-dose melphalan (HDM) is now considered standard therapy in the treatment of multiple myeloma, at least for patients under 65 years. Oral mucositis is a frequent non-hematological complication which causes severe pain, interferes with patient nutrition and can lead to systemic infection. Amifostine (WR-2721; Ethyol), a phosphoaminothiol, is a prodrug that protects a broad range of normal tissues from the cytotoxic damage induced by anticancer agents. We retrospectively compared two groups of patients with stage II/III previously untreated multiple myeloma who received between April 96 and May 2004 an induction chemotherapy with 3 or 4 cycles of VAD (vincristine, adriamycin, dexamethasone) followed by HDM (200 mg/m²) and autologous PBSC transplantation. These two groups either received (group A, n = 10 ) or did not receive (group B, n= 32) amifostine (740 mg/m²) before HDM. The occurrence of grade 3/4 oral mucositis was significantly decreased in group A in comparison to group B (10% versus 53%, p =0.023) with no difference for the time to mucosal recovery. Supportive care differed between the two groups: only 2 patients (20%) needed opioid treatment in group A versus 22 patients (69%) in group B ( p=0.005) and 1 patient (10%) required parenteral nutrition in group A compared to 16 patients (50%) in group B (p= 0.015). The occurrence of severe infectious complications did not differ between the two groups (0% versus 12,5%, p= 0.56). Amifostine did not affect haematological recovery, the median time to granulocyte recovery to > 500/μl was similar in the two groups (8,4 days versus 9,9 days, p=0.22). Moreover, there is no statistically significant difference between the amifostine and control group for the disease response. The tolerability of amifostine was excellent and no adverse effects were reported. This study suggest that amifostine can reduce mucosal damage associated with high dose melphalan-based therapy, reducing, as a consequence, the necessity of nutrition and analgesic support, without compromising therapeutic benefit. Obviously, these interesting results have to be confirmed by larger randomised trials.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1349-1349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan T. Vogl ◽  
Eric Stoopler ◽  
Lisa Davis ◽  
Thomas M. Paul ◽  
German Salazar ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1349 Background: High dose melphalan is the most common conditioning regimen for patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for multiple myeloma (MM). However, toxicity and efficacy of this treatment are variable, with the sources of variability poorly understood. We hypothesized that variation in melphalan pharmacokinetics would explain differences in outcomes after transplant. Methods: We evaluated 41 patients with MM undergoing ASCT with high-dose melphalan conditioning. Patients received melphalan on day -2 at a dose of 200 mg/m2 (one patient with poor renal function received 180 mg/m2) and ASCT on day 0. Melphalan dose was calculated using ideal body weight (IBW), with adjusted IBW used for patients weighing >120% of IBW. We assessed toxicity on day +7 using the Oral Mucositis Assessment Scale (OMAS), a physician evaluated measurement of erythema and ulceration (on a scale of 0–5, with higher scores indicating more severe mucositis). Patients reported the severity of mouth soreness on a scale of 0–10 using the Mucositis Daily Questionnaire (MDQ) on days 0, +3, +7, +11, +19, and +28. Melphalan concentrations were measured using HPLC/tandem mass spectrometry in plasma samples obtained during infusion and 2, 4, 8, 15, and 30 minutes, and 1, 2, 3.5, 8, and 14 hours after its completion, as well as immediately prior to stem cell infusion. Melphalan area under the curve (AUC) was estimated by non-compartmental analysis. Results: Patients' median age was 57 years (range 39–72); 59% were male. We observed significant variation in melphalan exposure, with a range of 7.6–26.6 mg*h/L (median 13.5). Severity of oral mucositis was directly related to AUC (with an increase of 0.1 on the OMAS score for every 1 unit increase in AUC, p=0.003). The most severe mucositis was seen in the 4 patients with an AUC ≥17.5 (75% had OMAS scores >1), while severe mucositis was rarely seen in the 18 patients with AUC ≤12.5 (only 1 of 18 had an OMAS score >1). The association between AUC and maximum reported mouth soreness was not statistically significant (an increase of 0.2 on the MDQ scale for every 1 unit increase in AUC, p=0.17), but there was a trend toward higher maximum reported mouth soreness in the 4 patients with AUC≥17.5 (mean 7.5 vs. 4 for other patients, p=0.07). Eight patients had detectable melphalan concentrations at the time of stem cell infusion (mean 3.8 ng/mL, range 1.8–7.1), though time to neutrophil and platelet recovery did not differ for these patients compared with those with undetectable melphalan levels. Of 19 patients with measurable disease at the time of transplant, 8 had stable disease (SD), 9 partial response (PR), and 2 complete response (CR) at day +100. The 2 patients with CR had higher melphalan exposure than patients without a CR (mean AUC 19 vs 11.6, p= 0.002), but there was no discernable difference in melphalan levels between patients with a PR or SD. Conclusion: Using standard dosing calculations in a representative sample of patients with myeloma, melphalan drug exposure was highly varied. Drug exposure was correlated with severity of oral mucositis, and complete responses were seen only in patients with high drug exposure. Further analyses are planned into the effect of obesity and renal dysfunction on pharmacokinetics. Exploration of the appropriate target AUC and strategies for reducing variability in drug exposure have the potential to improve both efficacy and toxicity of this effective and commonly used therapy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 904-904 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole M.A. Blijlevens ◽  
Maarten E de Chateau ◽  
Gergely Krivan ◽  
Werner Rabitsch ◽  
Arpad Szomor ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 904 Palifermin administered pre and post radiochemotherapy conditioning has previously been shown to significantly reduce the incidence and duration of severe oral mucositis (OM) in patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). This randomized clinical trial (RCT) aimed to study the efficacy and safety of palifermin when administered in two different dosing regimens in a chemotherapy-only conditioning setting. The efficacy of palifermin relative to placebo was investigated with palifermin given either pre/post high-dose melphalan (HDM) or pre HDM only in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) undergoing ASCT. Assessment of oral mucositis was primarily based on WHO grades (0/1, 2, 3 or 4) and safety primarily on adverse event (AE) reporting. 281 patients (mean age 56 ± 8 years) were enrolled at 39 centers; 224 patients were randomized to receive palifermin and 57 patients to receive placebo. In the palifermin group, 109 patients were randomized to the pre-only arm, receiving palifermin (60 μg/kg/day) iv for 3 consecutive days before HDM and 115 subjects were randomized to the pre/post arm receiving palifermin on 3 consecutive days before HDM and again on 3 consecutive days after ASCT. The number of subjects actually receiving study drug in the these two arms was 109 and 111, respectively. Assessments of OM and safety were made daily until 32 days post transplant or hospital discharge. There was no difference in maximum severity of OM between placebo and palifermin administered pre/post HDM (odds ratio: 0.7 [CI: 0.4, 1.3]) or pre HDM (odds ratio: 1.2 [CI: 0.6, 2.4]). Severe OM (WHO grade 3 and 4) occurred in 37% (placebo), 38% (pre/post-HDM) and 24% (pre-HDM) of the patients. A total of 275 patients (99.3%) experienced at least 1 AE during the study. There were more serious AEs and AEs reported as treatment related by the investigators for patients in the pre/post HDM arm, and less in the pre-HDM arm but still more than in the placebo arm. Overall, no statistically significant differences were observed between placebo and either the palifermin pre-post HDM arm or pre-only HDM arm for maximum severity of OM in this clinical setting with a chemotherapy conditioning regimen of short duration and a comparably low incidence of severe oral mucositis. The pre-only group, however, showed a numerically better result than placebo for the primary and most of the secondary efficacy endpoints. Patients treated with palifermin in the pre HDM arm experienced a more favorable safety profile than the pre/post HDM arm. Possible explanations for the apparent discrepancy compared to previously published trials might be differences in high dose chemotherapy and/or the shorter time interval between the pre and post doses in this study. The impact of the timing of the palifermin post-dose in relation to the pre-dose and in relation to the onset of manifest OM and pathogenesis thus needs to be further explored. Disclosures: Blijlevens: Biovitrum: Consultancy. de Chateau:Biovitrum : Employment. Lissmats:Biovitrum: Employment. Niederwieser:Biovitrum: Consultancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document