scholarly journals Phase I Study of Alemtuzumab for Therapy of Steroid-Refractory Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 804-811 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Nikiforow ◽  
Haesook T. Kim ◽  
Bhavjot Bindra ◽  
Sean McDonough ◽  
Brett Glotzbecker ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4608-4608
Author(s):  
Attilio Olivieri ◽  
Michele Cimminiello ◽  
Ivana Latesoriere ◽  
Pietro Leoni ◽  
Francesco Onida ◽  
...  

Chronic Graft versus Host Disease (cGvHD) is still the leading cause of late mortality in transplanted patients. Among the new drugs potentially useful in patients with steroid-refractory cGVHD (SR-cGVHD), the Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI) Imatinib emerged as promising agent; however in our previous experiences, patient's frailty and their reduced haematological tolerance heavily limited the daily dose of Imatinib (median dose administered was 200 mg/day). Thus we planned to evaluate in the same setting a the safety and activity of a second generation TKI, such as Nilotinib (NIL), characterized by a better haematological tolerance and that could allow to treat SR-cGVHD patients with a higher relative dosage than Imatinib, thus achieving a better efficacy. Basing on this rational we designed a phase I-II study, aimed to individuate the maximum tolerated dose ( MTD) and the activity of NIL in patients with SR-cGVHD (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01810718). Primary endpoint of the phase I study was to define the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of NIL, defined as the occurrence of any grade≥3 toxicity during at least one month of treatment. According to the Fibonacci standard 3+3 design, we started from an initial dose of 200 mg/day of NIL, up to a maximum of 600 mg/day. The drug has been supplied free of charge by Novartis Italia, Milan. In the phase II the MTD will be used to define the efficacy of NIL in SR-cGVHD patients, with similar characteristics of the previously Imatinib-treated population. Moreover all the patients enrolled in the phase I were allowed to continue NIL at the same dose, up to a cGVHD progression, if an objective improvement (OI) was documented after 3 months of treatment. We report here the preliminary results of a pre-planned interim analysis, during the phase I study, in 12 patients with SR-cGVHD who received NIL at low dose. The main characteristics of the enrolled patients are reported in table 1. Six patients received NIL 200mg/day and 6 NIL 300 mg/day. Two patients stopped NIL within 30 days: one due to cGVHD progression, the other had asymptomatic hypertransaminasemia (>5xULN) which normalized 1 month after stopping NIL; these patients received an alternative treatment. In 3 cases severe adverse events (SAE) have been reported: 1 patient had extramedullary relapse of Acute Leukemia 8 months after start of NIL, while 2 patients have been hospitalized; one due to a transient cGVHD flare, without drug interruption, the second for a late cGVHD progression; he eventually died. The most frequent extrahematological toxicities (grade 1-2 according to CTCAE) were headache, nausea, pruritus, cramps, asthenia, constipation, while the main hematological abnormalities were represented by anemia grade 1 (5/12patients), neutropenia gr.1 (1/12 patients) and lymphocyte count increase gr.2 (1/12 patients). (tab.2) With a median F-U of 10 months (range 4-20), 10 patients are alive, while two died for cGVHD progression (7 and 9 months after the enrollment). After 3 months of treatment with NIL 6 patients (50%) achieved an OI and 4 (33%) a stable disease; all the 10 patients continued Nilotinib at the same dose until ≥6 months of treatment: after 6 months we observed 5 OI, 1 stable disease and 2 mixed responses (2 lung responses with skin failure), while in 2 the response evaluation is still ongoing. These preliminary data suggest that, like Imatinib, NIL at low doses is safe and effective in SR-cGVHD patients; up to day the MTD has not been still achieved, therefore only after the end of the phase I study we will be able to fully define the NIL activity. This study is supported by GITMO (Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo). Disclosures: Off Label Use: Bendamustine.


2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. S376
Author(s):  
Myrna R. Nahas ◽  
Robert J. Soiffer ◽  
Edwin P. Alyea ◽  
Jon E. Arnason ◽  
Robin Joyce ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 712-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph Groth ◽  
Lenneke F.J. van Groningen ◽  
Tiago R. Matos ◽  
Manita E. Bremmers ◽  
Frank W.M.B. Preijers ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 375-381 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martino Introna ◽  
Giovanna Lucchini ◽  
Erica Dander ◽  
Stefania Galimberti ◽  
Attilio Rovelli ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2493-2493
Author(s):  
Albert C Yeh ◽  
Thomas R. Spitzer ◽  
Yi-Bin Chen ◽  
Steven McAfee ◽  
Karen K. Ballen ◽  
...  

Abstract Title: Serum Uric Acid Levels during Allogeneic Hematopoeitic Cell Transplantation and Subsequent Graft Versus Host Disease Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a donor T-cell driven response against host tissue that can complicate allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The initiation of aGVHD is thought to involve the stimulation of antigen presenting cells through exposure of the immune system to endogenous "danger signals" from dying cells, which can result from the cytotoxic effects of conditioning regimens. The identification of uric acid as one such critical factor released from injured cells was discovered over the past decade, and subsequent animal studies have demonstrated that suppressing uric acid can reduce T-cell activation. Furthermore, a phase I study of patients undergoing myeloablative allogeneic HCT at our institution suggested that the use of urate oxidase may modulate the development of aGHVD, presumably through lowering uric acid levels. In this retrospective study, we tested the hypothesis that patients who developed aGVHD have increased peri-transplant uric acid levels compared to those who did not. We included those who underwent myeloablative allogeneic HCT from 2007 to 2011 who were not enrolled in the aforementioned phase I study. Sixty-six patients with hematologic malignancies (AML=35, MDS=11, NHL=10 ALL=6, MPD=2, MM=1, CML=1) were analyzed. Notable transplant characteristics include conditioning regimen (Bu/Cy=26, Bu/Flu=29, Cy/TBI=7, Bu/Clo=3, Clo/TLI=1); donor status: matched related donor (MRD=40), matched unrelated donor (MUD=26); disease status: complete remission (CR=39), relapsed/refractory (R/R=27), and type of GVHD prophylaxis: cyclosporine based (CsA/MTX=24, CsA/MMF=3), tacrolimus based (Tac/MTX=16, Tac/MTX/ATG=17, Tac/MTX/Sirolimus=6). Serum uric acid levels were collected from day -7 to day +10 of transplant (up to 18 days recorded per patient). All patients received allopurinol from day -7 to day -1 per institutional protocol. On average, daily serum uric acid levels were recorded in 15.6 out of the 18 days designated per patient, and 83% (N=55) of patients had levels measured up to day +10 of transplantation. The incidence of aGVHD of any grade was 64% (N=42) and 45% (N=30) for grades II-IV. The incidence of mild or limited cGVHD was 35% (N=23) and moderate/severe or extensive cGVHD was 17% (N=11). Those who developed aGVHD had a significantly higher level of serum uric acid compared to those who did not: pre-transplant (d-7 to d0) period (p=0.003), post-transplant (d1 to d10) period (p<0.001) [Figure 1a]. Those who developed cGVHD had no statistically significant difference in serum uric acid levels compared to those who did not: pre-transplant (p=0.22), post-transplant (p=0.69) [Figure 1b]. Subgroup analyses showed that patients with R/R disease with aGVHD had significantly higher uric acid levels than those without aGVHD: pre-transplant (p<0.001); post-transplant (p<0.001), while patients in CR had similar uric acid levels: pre-transplant (p=0.48); post-transplant (p=0.45). Patients treated with cyclosporine or tacrolimus based prophylactic regimen showed similar trends in uric acid levels between aGVHD groups in the post-transplant period. These results suggest that elevated uric acid levels peri-transplantation may be associated with increased incidence of aGHVD but not cGVHD and may be more relevant in patients with more advanced disease. As a cause-effect relationship of uric acid levels and GVHD cannot be ascertained based on this retrospective data, future prospective studies will be required to clarify this association. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document