scholarly journals Increased Number of Prior Therapies and/or Use of Mismatched Unrelated Donors Adversely Affect Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (alloHCT) Outcomes in Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL)

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. S236-S237
Author(s):  
Asmita Mishra ◽  
Claudio Anasetti ◽  
Ernesto Ayala ◽  
Hugo Fernandez ◽  
Teresa Field ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Unrelated Donors ◽  
Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma

Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (allo-HCT) Can Induce Durable Remission in Heavily Pretreated Relapsed Hodgkin Lymphoma. (HL).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1192-1192
Author(s):  
Robert Chen ◽  
Joycelynne Palmer ◽  
Leslie Popplewell ◽  
Jessica Shen ◽  
Eileen Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Unrelated Donor ◽  
Heavily Pretreated

Abstract Abstract 1192 Poster Board I-214 Background: Even though Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a curable disease, about, 20-30% patients are either refractory to induction chemotherapy or relapse post treatment. High dose chemotherapy and autologous HCT has been shown to be an effective salvage therapy for patients with relapsed HL. However, relapse continues to occur after auto-HCT, especially in patients with chemoresistant or poor-risk features at relapse. The prognosis of these patients is poor with limited options of treatment. Although allo-HCT offers both cytoreduction and potential graft-versus-tumor effect, its use in relapsed HL has been limited by non-relapse mortality (NRM) and patient co-morbidities induced by numerous prior treatments. To examine the potential impact of allo-HCT on survival and disease outcomes, we performed retrospective analysis of allo-HCT in relapsed/refractory HL to determine if allo-HCT can induce long-term remission in heavily pretreated relapsed HL. Results: Between January 2003 and December 2008, 29 patients with relapsed HL underwent allo-HCT at City of Hope National Medical Center. The median age was 37 (range: 14-63). 20 (69%) patients were chemosensitive at time of allo-HCT. 17 (59%) patients had prior auto-HCT. 16 (55%) patients received matched siblings and 13 (45%) received unrelated donor cells. 20 (69%) patients had prior radiation treatments. The median number of prior regimens was 5 (range: 2-8). 23 (79%) patients underwent a non-myeloablative conditioning regimen while 6 (21%) patients had a myeloablative regimen. 14 (48%) patients received Tacrolimus/Sirolimus as graft versus host disease prophylaxis and 15 (52%) patients received a combination of Cellcept/CsA, Cellcept/CsA/MTX, Tacrolimus/MTX, or Tacrolimus/Sirolimus/MTX. With a median follow up of 31.9 months (range: 9.7-69.1) for surviving patients, the results show: Conclusion: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in heavily pretreated relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma is feasible, tolerable, and can induce durable clinical remissions. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

A Retrospective Comparison of Tacrolimus Vs. Cyclosporine for Immunosuppression After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with G-CSF-Mobilized Blood Cells

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 2319-2319
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Inamoto ◽  
Mary E.D. Flowers ◽  
Frederick R. Appelbaum ◽  
Paul A. Carpenter ◽  
H. Joachim Deeg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Blood Cells ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Acute Gvhd ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Hematopoietic Cell ◽  
Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation ◽  
Unrelated Donors ◽  
Total Body

Abstract Abstract 2319 Background: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common immunologic complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Cyclosporine or tacrolimus in combination with other agents represent widely accepted standards of care as immunosuppressive regimens after HCT. Results of open-label randomized prospective phase III studies have indicated that the risk of grades II-IV acute GVHD after bone marrow transplantation with related or unrelated donors is lower with the use of tacrolimus as compared to cyclosporine, in combination with methotrexate. The current study was carried out to compare results with tacrolimus versus cyclosporine after HCT with G-CSF-mobilized blood cells. Patients and methods: The study cohort included 510 consecutive patients who received a first G-CSF-mobilized blood cell graft from related or unrelated donors after high-intensity conditioning for treatment of hematological malignancies between 7/1/2003 and 2009 at our center. All patients received ursodeoxycholic acid from 2 weeks before conditioning until 90 days after HCT to prevent hepatic complications, and all patients received immunosuppression with either tacrolimus or cyclosporine in combination with methotrexate after HCT. Endpoints included grades II-IV acute GVHD, grades III-IV acute GVHD, chronic GVHD, end of treatment for chronic GVHD, overall survival, disease-free survival, recurrent malignancy and nonrelapse mortality. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to evaluate hazard ratios for these endpoints with tacrolimus as compared to cyclosporine. The models were adjusted for patient age, donor type, recipient and donor gender combination, disease type, disease risk category, use of total body irradiation in the conditioning regimen, and year of HCT. The analysis was carried out as of July, 2010. Results: The median age of patients was 47 (range, 1 to 66) years. Diagnosis at HCT was acute myeloid leukemia in 200 (39%) patients, acute lymphoblastic leukemia in 73 (14%), chronic myeloid leukemia in 49 (10%), myelodysplastic syndrome or myeloproliferative disorders in 160 (31%) and other lymphoid malignancies in 28 (5%). Total body irradiation was used for conditioning in 168 (33%) patients. Of the 510 patients, 277 (54%) had HLA-matched related donors, 203 (40%) had HLA-matched unrelated donors, and 30 (6%) had HLA-mismatched related or unrelated donors. Outcomes according to immunosuppression with tacrolimus or cyclosporine are shown in Table 1. Multivariate analysis showed no statistically significant differences between tacrolimus and cyclosporine for any of the endpoints tested (Table 2), although the results showed a trend suggesting that the risk of non-relapse mortality might be lower with tacrolimus as compared to cyclosporine. Conclusion: In this retrospective analysis, tacrolimus offered no statistically significant advantage over cyclosporine for preventing grades II-IV acute GVHD after HCT with G-CSF-mobilized blood cells, and results for other outcomes also showed no statistically significant differences. Although our data support the hypothesis that either regimen could be an acceptable standard of care for immunosuppression, the number of patients analyzed in this study is not sufficient to completely exclude clinically meaningful differences in outcomes with the two regimens. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Tacrolimus and cyclosporine for immunosuppression after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document