scholarly journals Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in First Complete Remission Enhances Graft-versus-Leukemia Effect in Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Antileukemic Activity of Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 1083-1094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seok Lee ◽  
Byung-Sik Cho ◽  
Sung-Yong Kim ◽  
Su-Mi Choi ◽  
Dong-Gun Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Antileukemic Activity ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
Graft Versus Leukemia ◽  
First Complete Remission ◽  
Graft Versus Leukemia Effect

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Should Be Performed in First Complete Remission in Adults with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia; Strong Antileukemic Activity of Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2992-2992
Author(s):  
Seok Lee ◽  
Byung-Shik Cho ◽  
Sung-Yong Kim ◽  
Ki-Seong Eom ◽  
Yoo-Jin Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Graft Versus Host Disease ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Graft Versus Host ◽  
First Complete Remission

Abstract Purpose: The role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) for adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) remains unclear because interpretation of transplantation outcome is complicated by the criteria used to select patients for transplantation and by the relatively small number of patients studied. Moreover, whether SCT from an unrelated donor could be a treatment option of equal value in a case lacking a compatible related donor remains controversial. The aim of the present study was to determine the graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) effect and risk factors affecting outcome of 218 adults with ALL who received allogeneic SCT during the last 10 years (1995 to 2004). Patients and Methods: The study population was 218 consecutive adults receiving an allogeneic SCT from matched sibling (n=162) or unrelated (n=56; 40 matched, 16 mismatched) donors at the Catholic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Center in Korea. Their median age was 30 years (range, 15–61 years). One hundred eighty-three (83.9%) patients had high-risk criteria, and of these, 69 (31.7%) had t(9;22)/BCR-ABL and 7 (3.2%) had t(4;11)/MLL-AF4. One hundred sixty-five patients (75.7%) were transplanted in first complete remission (CR1); 23 (10.5%) in CR2; and 30 (13.8%) were resistant to chemotherapy before transplantation. Most patients (n=206, 94.5%) received a preparative treatment of total body irradiation (TBI)-containing regimen (TBI/cyclophosphamide for CR1, TBI/cytarabine/melphalan for >CR1). Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis was attempted by administering calcineurin inhibitor (cyclosporine for sibling, tacrolimus for unrelated) plus methotrexate. Results: With a median follow-up of 52 months (range, 15+ to 130+ months) after SCT, the 5-year probability of disease-free survival (DFS) was 51.3%±3.5% for all patients; 62.4%±4.3% for patients in CR1; and 11.3%±4.4% for patients in >CR1 at transplantation. There was no difference in DFS for sibling and unrelated transplant patients in CR1 (65.2%±4.3% v 62.3%±8.0%). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the most powerful predictive factor affecting relapse and DFS was disease status at transplantation (CR1 v >CR1, p<0.001). The presence of chronic GVHD was also found to be significantly associated with favorable outcome (p<0.001). Conclusion: Our data in combination with recent studies suggest that matched related or unrelated allogeneic SCT should be performed in CR1 in adults with ALL. Further studies to develop treatment strategies to reduce leukemic cell burden and to enhance GVL effect are needed. The indications for allogeneic SCT also should be continuously evaluated.

Outcome of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation in Adult Patients With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: No Difference in Related Compared With Unrelated Transplant in First Complete Remission

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14) ◽  
pp. 2816-2825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Kiehl ◽  
Ludwig Kraut ◽  
Rainer Schwerdtfeger ◽  
Bernd Hertenstein ◽  
Mats Remberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
First Complete Remission

Purpose The role of unrelated allogeneic stem-cell transplantation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients is still not clear, and only limited data are available from the literature. We analyzed factors affecting clinical outcome of ALL patients receiving a related or unrelated stem-cell graft from matched donors. Patients and Methods The total study population was 264 adult patients receiving a myeloablative allogeneic stem-cell transplant for ALL at nine bone marrow transplantation centers between 1990 and 2002. Of these, 221 patients receiving a matched related or unrelated graft were analyzed. One hundred forty-eight patients received transplantation in complete remission; 62 patients were in relapse; and 11 patients were refractory to chemotherapy before transplant. Fifty percent of patients received bone marrow, and 50% received peripheral blood stem cell from a human leukocyte antigen–identical related (n = 103), or matched unrelated (n = 118) donor. Results Disease-free survival (DFS) at 5 years was 28%, with 76 patients (34%) still alive (2.2 to 103 months post-transplantation), and 145 deceased (65 relapses, transplant-related mortality, 45%). We observed an advantage regarding DFS in favor of patients receiving transplantation during their first complete remission (CR) in comparison with patients receiving transplantation in or after second CR (P = .014) or who relapsed (P < .001). We observed a clear trend toward improved survival in favor of B-lineage ALL patients compared with T-lineage ALL patients (P = .052), and Philadelphia chromosome–positive patients had no poorer outcome than Philadelphia chromosome–negative patients. Total-body irradiation–based conditioning improved DFS in comparison with busulfan (P = .041). Conclusion Myeloablative matched related or matched unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in ALL patients should be performed in first CR.

In Adult Philadelphia Chromosome Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, The Negative Prognostic Impact Of IKZF1, CDKN2A/B and PAX5 Deletions Is Not Abrogated By Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation In First Complete Remission

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 231-231
Author(s):  
Heike Pfeifer ◽  
Katharina Raum ◽  
Sandra Markovic ◽  
Stephanie Fey ◽  
Julia Obländer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
B Cell Development ◽  
Genome Wide ◽  
First Complete Remission

Abstract Philadelphia chromosome positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is traditionally considered the subtype with the worst prognosis, despite recent improvements in long-term survival brought about by the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) such as imatinib or dasatinib. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (aSCT) remains the most effective curative post-remission therapy in adults but appears to be less critical in children, indicating a substantial clinical and biological heterogeneity within the subgroup of Ph+ ALL. The ability to segregate Ph+ ALL into subgroups with different prognosis on the basis of reductions of BCR-ABL1 transcript levels during therapy lends further support to the heterogeneity of this type of leukemia, for which the genetic basis is not known. Microarray-based genome-wide profiling studies conducted predominantly in pediatric ALL patients have recently revealed novel recurrent submicroscopic aberrations of genes involved in B-cell development and cell cycle regulation, such as CDKN2A/B, IKZF1, PAX5, ETV6, RB1, BTG1 and EBF1. Deletions of IKZF1, CDKN2A/B and PAX genes have received the most attention due to their high frequency particularly in BCR-ABL1-positive ALL and their association with an inferior prognosis in the setting of combined TKI and chemotherapy. Their prognostic relevance in the setting of allogeneic SCT for adult or pediatric high risk BCP-ALL is not known. We therefore examined whether the negative prognostic role of IKZF1 aberrations and other frequent microdeletions of genes associated with B-cell development can be overcome by allogeneic SCT in CR1. A total of 137 newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL pts. (median age 42 years, range 18-64y, 79 male 58 female) treated within the prospective multicenter GMALL study 07/03 were analyzed. 96 of these patients underwent aSCT in first complete remission (CR), 8 pts. were primary refractory, 12 CR pts. did not undergo aSCT and relapsed, 11 pts. died during induction. Genome-wide copy number analysis in search for acquired copy number alterations (CNA) was performed with Affymetrix SNP 6.0 arrays with anonymous references. Copy number polymorphisms were excluded from the data by comparison with known copy number polymorphisms registered in the UCSC genome browser http://genome.ucsc.edu/, (hg-18). Putatively acquired CNAs were validated by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and germline matched SNP array analysis of n=20 samples within the study. Of the 96 pts. transplanted in CR1, 48 remain in CR (CCR), 30 pts. relapsed after aSCT and 7 died of treatment related causes, survival data only are available for one patient. CDKN2A/B genomic alterations were identified in 41% (40/97) of patients, deletions of IKZF1 and PAX5 were observed in 61% (59/97) and 39% (38/97) of pts., respectively. Univariate analysis of the complete cohort revealed that deletion of CDKN2A/B was the only aberration with a statistically significant negative effect on overall survival (OS) (p=0.003). Among patients transplanted in CR1, IKZF1-deletions were associated with inferior median time to relapse after SCT (56 mos vs. n.r., p=0.01), DFS from SCT (15.6 mos. vs. n.r.; p=0.024) and OS (median 40 mos. vs. not reached (n.r.) p=0.04) compared with the IKZF1 wildtype cohort. Similarly, the prognosis of pts. with CDKN2A/B deletions was inferior in terms of DFS (median 10.6 mos. vs. n.r.; p=0.022) and OS (median 25 mos. vs. n.r.; p=0.01), but not of remission duration from SCT. PAX5 (p=0.07) but not the combination of all three lesions (p=0.14) showed a trend to a worse prognosis. Of the more uncommon genetic aberrations BTLA, EBF1, ETV6, RB1 and BTG1, only the latter was associated with a lower probability of remaining in CR (0% vs. 67% at 5 years; p=0.012) or DFS (0% vs. 52% at 5 years; p=0.043), with a trend towards shorter OS (median 35 mos. vs. 87 mos; p=0.078). In conclusion, genomic lesions of IKZF1, CDKN2 and PAX5 identify a subgroup of Ph+ ALL pts. who have an inferior survival despite undergoing aSCT in CR1. Their poor outcome is attributable primarily to a high relapse rate after SCT, emphasizing the need to introduce additional treatment elements prior to and after aSCT. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation from Unmanipulated Haploidentical Donors Versus Matched or Mismatched 9/10 Unrelated Donors in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in First Complete Remission: On Behalf of the ALWP of the EBMT

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2174-2174
Author(s):  
Noga Shem-Tov ◽  
Christophe Peczynski ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Maija Itälä-Remes ◽  
Didier Blaise ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Unrelated Donors ◽  
Matched Sibling ◽  
First Complete Remission

Abstract Background: Unmanipulated T-cell replete haploidentical allogeneic stem cell transplantation has become an attractive alternative choice for patients with no HLA matched sibling or unrelated donors. However data of outcome in patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) is still scarce. The Acute Leukemia Working Party (ALWP) of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) conducted this study to compare the outcome of allogeneic transplantation (Allo-SCT) from haploidentical donor (Haplo) versus matched (MUD 10/10) or mismatched (MMUD 9/10) unrelated donor for patients with ALL in first Complete Remission (CR1). Methods: The outcomes of 1,234 adult patients with Philadelphia positive or negative (Ph+ / Ph-) B ALL or T ALL in CR1 who underwent Allo-SCT between 2007 and 2016 were analyzed. Comparison was made between Haplo (136 patients), MUD 10/10 (809 patients) and MMUD 9/10 (289 patients). Multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional-hazard model. To control potential confounding factors between treatments that could influence outcome, propensity score matching was also performed between Haplo and the 2 other groups. Results: Main population characteristics are depicted in Table 1. Recipients of Haplo, MUD 10/10 and MMUD 9/10 were comparable concerning median age, time from diagnosis to Allo-SCT and myeloablative versus reduced intensity conditioning (MAC/RIC). However, Haplo transplants cohort differed in several characteristics from the MUD and MMUD patients groups. The percentage of female donors was higher in Haplo transplants and female to male mismatch was higher accordingly, CMV matched negative status was lower in Haplo. The source of stem cells was bone marrow (BM) versus peripheral blood (PB) stem cells in significantly higher percentage of Haplo transplants (53.7% vs 15.1% and 16.6% for MUD and MMUD respectively, p<0.0001). Most Haplo patients received post-transplant cyclophosphamide for graft versus host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis (77%) while this regimen was rarely used in the other groups (about 3%, p=0.0005). Univariate analysis showed similar results in Haplo, MUD and MMUD. Disease free survival (DFS) at 3 years was 49±11%, 53±4% and 55±7%, respectively (p=0.67) (Figure 1). Overall survival (OS) was 54±11%, 62±4% and 62±6%, respectively (p=0.11) (Figure 2). Relapse incidence (RI) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 3 years were not different either, RI was 28±9%, 28±4% and 25±6%, respectively (p=0.7) and NRM was 23±8%, 19±3% and 20±6%, respectively (p=0.6). Acute GVHD (AGVHD), either grade II-IV or grade III-IV and chronic GVHD (CGVHD) did not differ between the 3 groups (p=0.1, p=1.0 and p=0.6 respectively). The GVHD-relapse free survival (GRFS) was also not statistically different between the groups, 43±10%, 43±4% and 46±7%, respectively (p=0.7). After adjustment for center effect, patient age, donor/patient gender, donor and patient CMV serostatus, ALL type (B Ph- vs B Ph+ vs T), time from diagnosis to SCT, type of conditioning and cell source (PB vs BM), the multivariate Cox model showed that Haplo recipients did not experience worse outcomes compared to MUD 10/10 and MMUD 9/10. Indeed, compared to Haplo, the Hazard Ratio (HR) for DFS was 1.1 for MUD (p=0.7) and 1.1 for MMUD (p=0.8). The HR for OS in MUD and MMUD did not differ from Haplo either (HR=0.9, p=0.4 and HR=1.0, p=1.0 respectively). Moreover, compared to Haplo, SCT from MUD and MMUD were not associated with lower hazards for RI (HR=0.9, p=0.8 and HR=0.7, p=0.2 respectively), NRM (HR=0.7, p=0.2 and HR=0.8, p=0.4 respectively), AGVHD II-IV (HR=1.1, p=0.8 and HR=1.2, p=0.3 respectively) and CGVHD (HR=0.8, p=0.2 and HR=0.9, p=0.6 respectively). Propensity matching confirmed the results of the multivariate Cox analysis with no difference in outcome between Haplo, MUD and MMUD. Compared to Haplo the HR for DFS and OS were 1.04 (p=0.84) and 0.85 (p=0.50) for MUD and 0.9 (p=0.66) and 0.82 (p=0.48) for MMUD. Conclusions: Outcomes of adult patients with ALL in CR1 receiving Haplo Allo-SCT are comparable to MUD or MMUD transplants. Haplo should be considered as an additional option for patients lacking a matched sibling donor. Disclosures Tischer: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Jazz Advisory Board. Mohty:MaaT Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document