scholarly journals 185: Feasibility of autologous stem cell transplant followed by reduced intensity allogeneic stem cell transplantation for high risk neuroblastoma

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 68-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.J. Yamashiro ◽  
A. Lee ◽  
M. Bhatia ◽  
J. Glade-Bender ◽  
E. Qualter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Reduced Intensity

Outcomes of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma in the Elderly: A Single Center Experience

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 5505-5505
Author(s):  
Ghulam Rehman Mohyuddin ◽  
Shaun DeJarnette ◽  
Clint Divine ◽  
Tara L Lin ◽  
Leyla Shune ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Pulmonary Toxicity ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is a potentially curative option for lymphoma, yet there remains a bias against offering this therapy to the elderly. Patients above age 65 are nearly always excluded from clinical trials with ASCT, limiting our understanding of the efficacy and toxicities of ASCT in this population. This lack of data and bias against ASCT in the elderly may delay referral for patients who may benefit from a transplant. Here, we report our single institution outcomes from all patients aged 65 and greater who underwent autologous stem cell transplant for lymphoma at our institution. DESIGN AND METHODS : We identified 93 consecutive patients ³ 65 years of age (median age 68.6 years) with lymphoma who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation at University of Kansas Medical Center from 2000 to 2015. After IRB approval, data was extracted using the institutional database. These patients had frequently received at least two treatments, were often beyond first complete remission at the time of transplantation and received their transplants later after diagnosis. Table 1 below summarizes the pre-transplant characteristics of our patients. RESULTS: All patients received G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cells. Engraftment data is available for 87 out of 93 patients. Median number of days to neutrophil recovery (Absolute neutrophil count >500) was 11 (range 9-14). Median number of RBC and platelet transfusion in this group was 2 (range 0-10) and 3 (range 0-39), respectively. Non-relapse mortality at 100 days for the entire group was 2.15%. Overall survival at 100-days was 96.8%. Three patients (3.2 %) developed grade IV pulmonary toxicity and one patient developed grade IV veno-occlusive disease. With a median follow up of 744 days (41-2431), a disease free survival of 373 days was noted. In 63 patients who underwent transplant prior to 2013, 1-year and 2-year overall survival was found to be 84.2% and 72.1 respectively. Of the deaths in first year, 6 (55%) were related to relapse/progression, two (18%) due to pulmonary toxicity, 2 (18%) due to cardiac toxicity and 1 (9%) due to infection. In 17 patients (18.2%), transplant was performed completely/partially as an outpatient procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Although retrospective in nature, these results suggest that transplant related mortality in elderly patients with lymphoma is similar to historic younger cohorts. Chronological age should not be used alone in evaluating lymphoma patients for autologous stem cell transplantation. Instead, a comprehensive evaluation using Hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index and geriatric assessment should be used to guide decision-making. As the elderly population grows, an individualized approach to each patient considering all available treatment options is needed to make a potentially curative ASCT for high risk or relapsed lymphoma available to more patients. Table 1. No of patients (%) GenderMale Female 60 (65) 33 (35) Age at ASCT, median (range) 68.6 ( range 65-80) Hodgkin Disease Non Hodgkin Disease 5 (5) 88 (95) NHL subtypes Diffuse Large B- Cell Lymphoma Mantle Follicular Other 35 (40) 18 (20) 16 (18) 19 (22) Disease Status at ASCTCR1 CR 2 or more CRU PR Relapse1 Relapse 2 or more Primary Refractory 29 (31.2) 29 (31.2) 6 (6.5) 19 (20.4) 5 (5.4) 2 (2.2) 3 (3.2) Response to most recent chemoComplete remission Partial remission Progressive disease 64 (68.9) 19 (20.4) 10 (10.8) HCT-CI (% from those with obtained data) 0 1-2 3 or more N/A 15(19.0) 23(29.1) 41(51.9) 14 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICCs) Can Be Successfully Utilized in Haematological Patients: Efficacy of an Educational Program.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 3161-3161
Author(s):  
Alessandra Malato ◽  
Andrea Luppino ◽  
Raffaele Pipitone ◽  
Maria Grazia Donà ◽  
Francesco Acquaviva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Intensive Chemotherapy ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem ◽  
Thrombotic Complications ◽  
Central Catheters

Abstract Abstract 3161 Purpose: Patients with haematological disorders frequently require the insertion of medium or long-term central venous catheters (CVCs) for stem-cell transplantation, the administration of chemotherapy, or transfusions. Although peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) have been in use for many years, little data exist on their use in patients receiving intensive chemotherapy and blood progenitor cell transplantation. Methods: Evidence-based interventions were implemented in our department from November 2009 to July 2012, and include: 1.An high level nurse education program for correct practices and prevention of catheter-associated complications. was developed for PICC nursing team; 2) The use of ultrasound guide for the insertion of the tip of PICCs, thanks to a special operator training; 3) Bedside placement and confirmed PICC tip placement by chest radiography after removal of the guidewire and before the securing of the catheter; 4) Maintenance of maximum sterile barrier precautions during PICC insertion and aftercare; 5) chlorhexidine preparation, replace 10% povidone iodine for skin antisepsis; 6) adoption of PICC patient nurse archive, including the information of weekly PICC line review at our department for each patient. Aim: Here, we carried out a clinical prospective investigation to determine the efficacy of these interventions in reducing the rate of PICC-related complications (thrombotic events, exit site infection and other complications requiring early removal of PICCs); the studied population included hematology patients receiving intensive chemotherapy compared to allogeneic/autologous stem cell transplant recipients. Results: Three hundred sixty-four (364) PICCs were in place in 299 patients for a total of 41.111 PICC days ( range, 1–482 days; mean 112,94 days); 292 were inserted in patients receiving conventional chemotherapies, and 72 in patients undergoing allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Sixty-six (60) PICCs were inserted during severe thrombocytopenia (platelets < 50 × 10(9)/L), seventy (70) during severe neutropenia (neutrophils < 0.5 × 10(9)/L) and thirty-eight (38) during antithrombotic prophylaxis. Predominantly, patients had Lymphoma (50%). The rate of major complication was very low: 15 thrombotic complications PICC-related (4%; 0.36 per 1,000 CVC days), and 3 CRBSI (0,8%; 0.07 per 1,000 CVC days) during neutropenia. Mechanical complications occurred in 52 catheters, and were accidental dislodgement (30), catheter break (3), catheter inadequate (19); other reasons for catheter removal were completion of therapy (137), lumen occlusion (19) and death (58). Interesting, taking in account the underlying disease, lymphoma and leukemia patients have, respectively, an increased risk of developing a CRBSI and a thrombotic PICCs-complication when submitted to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) (see table 1). However, compared with allogeneic/autologous stem cell transplant group, the intensive chemotherapy group was associated with a marginally lower incidence of CRBSI complication rate (0.6 % vs 1.0 %, 0.10 vs 0.60 per 1,000 CVC days) [odds ratio (OR) 2,042]; no relevant differences in terms of thrombotic complications between the two cohorts (4.11 % vs 4.17%), 0.29 vs 0.39 per 1,000 CVC days) [odds ratio (OR) 1.014]. Conclusions: Our findings suggest, therefore, PICC devices are a viable and safe option for management of the haematology patients receiving intensive chemotherapy and even in patients particularly prone to infective and thrombotic complications such as patients receiving blood stem cell transplantation. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplantation

2007 ◽  
pp. 269-282
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Haemopoietic Stem Cell ◽  
Haemopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Reduced Intensity

Principles 270 Complications of allogeneic transplant 274 Reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) transplants 280 An allogeneic stem cell transplant is where the source of haemopoietic (blood forming) stem cells is from someone other than the patient. There are a number of reasons why an allogeneic stem cell transplant may be useful:...

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document