scholarly journals 181: Kinetics of engraftment following dual unrelated cord blood transplantation with reduced intensity conditioning

2007 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
P.-L. Tan ◽  
M.S. Villegas ◽  
Y.-H. Chan ◽  
E.-J. Yeoh ◽  
T.-C. Quah
Keyword(s):  
Cord Blood ◽  
Cord Blood Transplantation ◽  
Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽  
Unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation ◽  
Blood Transplantation ◽  
Unrelated Cord Blood ◽  
Kinetics Of ◽  
Reduced Intensity

Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen in Single Unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation in Adults with Hematological Malignant Disorders. An Eurocord-Netcord and SFGM-TC Survey.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 3143-3143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanderson Rocha ◽  
Bernard Rio ◽  
Federico Garnier ◽  
Marc Renaud ◽  
Anne Sirvent ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cord Blood ◽  
Cord Blood Transplantation ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Reduced Intensity Conditioning ◽  
Blood Transplantation ◽  
Reduced Intensity Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Conditioning Regimens ◽  
Unrelated Cord Blood ◽  
One Year ◽  
Reduced Intensity

Abstract Results of reduced intensity conditioning regimen (RIC) in unrelated cord blood transplantation (UCBT) have been reported, however more frequently RIC was performed using double cord blood transplants. In order to study risk factors in single RIC-UCBT we have analyzed 65 patients with hematological malignancies (ALL=10, AML=37, Hodking and NHL=10, MDS=4, CML=3, Myeloma =1) transplanted from 1999–2005 and reported to Eurocord and SFGM-TC. The median follow-up was 8 months (3–26) and the median age was 47 years (16–76). At transplant, 49% of the patients had advanced phase of disease and 39% had received a previous autologous transplants. The conditioning regimen varied according diasease and centers: Fludarabine(FLU)+Endoxan (EDX) +TBI (2Gy) was given to 33 patients, FLU+(EDX or Melphalan) in 11, FLU+BU (<8mg/kg) associated or not to other drugs in 13, FLU+TBI(2GY) in 3 and other regimens in 5 patients. ATG/ALG was added in 26% of the cases. GVHD prophylaxis most commonly (55%) consisted of CsA and MMF; 87% received hematopoietic growth factors (<day 8). The median nucleated cell dose infused was 2.4 x107/kg and the graft was HLA identical (6/6) ( HLA A and B low resolution and DRB1 allelic typing) in 3 cases, 5/6 in 15, 4/6 in 37 and 3/6 in 10. Results: Median time to neutrophil recovery (>500/mm3) was 20 days (0–56) and 35 dyas for platelets recovery (>20.000/mm3). At day 60 probability of neutrophil recovery was 87± 7% of the 33 patients who received the Flu+End+TBI conditioning regimen and was 65±10% for patients receiving other regimens (p<0.01). Chimerism analysis was available in 71% of the patients at 3 months and was full donor in 67%, mixed chimerism in 9% and autologous reconstitution in 24%. Grade II aGVHD was observed in 13%, grade III in 7% and grade IV in 7%; the TRM was 45±7% overall, 50±15% in acute leukemia, 30±15% in lymphomas and 27±16% for other diagnoses. The TRM at one year for those receiving <2.4 x 107 TNC/kg was 53±9% and for those receiving >2.4 x107TNC/kg was 39±10% (p=0.07). For patients receiving Flu+End+TBI the TRM at one year was 24±10% and for those receiving other conditioning regimens was 60±9% (p=0.001). DFS at one year for lymphomas was 50±9%, for leukemias was 27±7% and for other diagnoses was zero. When the HLA compatibility was 6/6 or 5/6, DFS at one year was 42±12%, for 4/6 disparities DFS was 27±9% and for 3/6 disparities DFS was zero. DFS was 43±11% for those receiving Flu+End+TBI, and was 16±7% for patients receiving other conditioning regimens (p=0.005). For patients receiving >2.4 x 107TNC/kg the DFS was 31±12% and for patients receiving <2.4 x 107TNC/kg the DFS was 14±8% (p=0.05). In collusion, results of single RIC-UCBT are encouraging; cell dose and HLA remain important factors in this setting. The type of conditioning (Flu+End+TBI) seems to be associated with decreased TRM and better DFS, but a multivariate analysis with a higher number of patients is needed.

Reduced-Intensity Versus Myeloablative Conditioning for Unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation in Adults with Acute Leukemia: A Report from Eurocord, the Acute Leukemia Working Party and the Cord Blood Committee of the Cellular Therapy & Immunobiology Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 155-155
Author(s):  
Frederic Baron ◽  
Ruggeri Annalisa ◽  
Eric Beohou ◽  
Myriam Labopin ◽  
Guillermo Sanz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Leukemia ◽  
Cord Blood ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cord Blood Transplantation ◽  
Working Party ◽  
Myeloablative Conditioning ◽  
Unrelated Cord Blood Transplantation ◽  
Blood Transplantation ◽  
Unrelated Cord Blood ◽  
Reduced Intensity

Abstract BACKRGOUND. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) is the first cause of treatment failure after unrelated cord blood transplantation (UCBT) following myeloablative conditioning (MAC). In the last decade, reduced-intensity conditionings (RIC) for UCBT have been developed with the aim of reducing NRM and allowing older patients and those with medical comorbidities to benefit from UCBT. The aim of our retrospective registry study was to compare outcomes of acute leukemia (AL) adult patients given UCBT after either RIC or MAC regimens. Regimens were classified as MAC or RIC based on EBMT criteria. PATIENTS AND METHODS. Data from 1352 adult (> 18 yrs) patients with AL (acute myeloid leukemia [AML; n=894] or acute lymphoblastic leukemia [ALL; n=458]) given a first single or double UCBT from 2004 to 2013 at EBMT-affiliated centers were included in this retrospective study. RESULTS. 518 patients were given UCB after RIC, while 834 patients were administered MAC. The most frequently used conditioning regimens combined either TBI, cyclophosphamide and Flu (TCF regimen, given in 22% of MAC vs 75% of RIC recipients, P<0.001), or thiotepa, Bu and Flu (TBF, given in 32% of MAC vs 6% of RIC recipients, P<0.001). In comparison to MAC recipients, RIC recipients were almost 2 decades older (median age 52.5 vs 33.7 yrs, P<0.001), were more often transplanted for AML (80% vs 57%, P=0.001), received more frequently 2 cord blood units (61 vs 32%, P<0.001), received more frequently units with > or = 2 HLA-mismatches (69% vs 58%, P<0.001), received more TNC (median 3.5x10E7 vs 2.9x10E7, P<0.001), and received less frequently ATG in the conditioning (23% versus 57%). Disease status at UCBT was comparable in both groups (51% of patients in CR1 and 17% >CR). Median follow-up for survivors was 25 months. In univariate analyses, in comparison to patients given MAC, RIC recipients had a similar rate of neutrophil engraftment (89.5 vs 89%, P=0.7), and a similar incidence of grade II-IV acute (34% vs 29%, P=0.1) and chronic (22% vs 26%, P= 0.22) GVHD. In contrast, at 2-yr, RIC recipients had a higher incidence of disease relapse (41 vs 24%, P<0.001) but a lower NRM (19 vs 37%, P<0.001), translating to similar leukemia-free survival (LFS, 40% vs 38%, P=0.6) but better overall survival (OS, 47 vs 42%, P=0.01) than MAC recipients (Figure 1). Further, among ALL patients, the use of TCF regimen (n=159) was associated lower NRM (21 vs 40% at 2-yr, P<0.001), lower relapse incidence (24 vs 34%, P=0.07), and better OS (63 vs 34%, P<0.001) and LFS (55 vs 27%, P<0.001). We performed separate multivariate analyses (MVA) for patients with AML and ALL. In MVA for AML patients, the use of RIC regimen was associated with a higher incidence of relapse (HR=1.6, P=0.005) but a suggestion for lower NRM (HR=0.7, P=0.1) translating to similar OS (HR=1.0, P=0.9) and LFS (HR=1.1, P=0.3). Similarly, in MVA for ALL patients, the use of RIC regimen was associated with a higher incidence of relapse (HR=2.0, P=0.002) but a lower NRM (HR=0.6, P=0.04) translating to similar OS (HR=0.8, P=0.2) and LFS (HR=1.1, P=0.5). Further, interestingly, conditioning with TCF-based regimen was associated with a lower incidence of relapse (HR=0.5, P=0.004) translating into better OS (HR=0.6, P=0.013) and LFS (HR 0.6, P=0.002) in ALL patients in MVA adjusted for conditioning intensity (RIC vs MAC). CONCLUSIONS. These data suggest that LFS and OS might be as good with RIC than with MAC in adults AL patients offered UCBT. These observations could serve as basis for future prospective randomized studies. Figure 1. Unadjusted UCBT outcomes in patients transplanted following RIC versus MAC. Figure 1. Unadjusted UCBT outcomes in patients transplanted following RIC versus MAC. Disclosures Milpied: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Sierra:Amgen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Mohty:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Schmid:Neovii: Consultancy; Janssen Cilag: Other: Travel grand.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document