scholarly journals Evaluation of urinary biomarkers of oxidative/nitrosative stress in adolescents and adults with Down syndrome

Author(s):  
Carlos Campos ◽  
Rodrigo Guzmán ◽  
Encarnación López-Fernández ◽  
Ángela Casado
Life Sciences ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 89 (17-18) ◽  
pp. 655-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Campos ◽  
Rodrigo Guzmán ◽  
Encarnación López-Fernández ◽  
Ángela Casado

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 1012
Author(s):  
Kavita Krell ◽  
Kelsey Haugen ◽  
Amy Torres ◽  
Stephanie L. Santoro

Levels of independence vary in individuals with Down syndrome (DS). We began this study to describe the current life skills in our clinic population of children and adults with DS. We collected and reviewed demographics, living situation, and life skills from an electronic intake form used in clinic procedures. Descriptive statistics for this cohort study included mean, standard deviation, and frequencies. From 2014–2020, 350 pediatric and 196 adult patients (range 0–62 years) with a first visit to the Massachusetts General Hospital Down Syndrome Program are described. Pediatric patients were most often enrolled in school, and in an inclusion setting. Adult patients were most often participating in a day program, living with family, and wanted to continue living with family in the future. Most (87%) of adults with DS communicated verbally, though fewer could use written communication (17%). Life skills of greatest importance to adolescents and adults with DS included: learning about healthy foods (35%), preparing meals (34%), providing personal information when needed (35%), and describing symptoms to a doctor (35%). Life skills for patients with DS are varied; those associated with a medical appointment, such as sharing symptoms with the doctor, could improve for greater independence.


2016 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guadalupe Elizabeth Morales ◽  
Bernadette Rogé

We synthesize the main findings from two studies that examined moral judgement abilities in people with autism, and in people with Down syndrome. In both studies, the way these people mentally combine information about the intent of a harmful act and the severity of its consequences when attributing blame to an offender was compared with that of typically developing controls. Adolescents and adults with autism or with Down syndrome were, practically to the same extent as controls, able to take into account both information pieces for attributing blame. It would be an exaggeration to imply that adolescents and adults with either autism or Down syndrome are severely immature in moral judgement based on the fact that they are usually not able to explain or justify their judgements with sophisticated philosophical arguments. By contrast, children with autism blame attribution appeared to be essentially based on consequence information. The finding that adolescents and adults with autism or Down syndrome are able to make moral judgements in a way that is not very different from adolescents and adults of the same age could influence the way these people are perceived, cared for, and attributed basic rights.


2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin M. Jensen ◽  
Elizabeth J. Campagna ◽  
Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga ◽  
Allan V. Prochazka ◽  
Desmond K. Runyan

2020 ◽  
pp. 101016
Author(s):  
Kristin M. Jensen ◽  
Elizabeth J. Campagna ◽  
Elizabeth Juarez-Colunga ◽  
Desmond K. Runyan ◽  
Allan V. Prochazka

PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. e81053 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Stella Valle ◽  
Matteo Cioni ◽  
Mariangela Pisasale ◽  
Maria Rosita Pantò ◽  
Antonino Casabona

2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.E. Guzman-Muñoz ◽  
L.B. Gutierrez-Navarro ◽  
S.E. Miranda-Diaz

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document