In Situ Repair of a Primary Brucella-Infected Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Long-Term Follow-Up

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 241.e1-241.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvain Goudard ◽  
Charles Pierret ◽  
Bruno de La Villéon ◽  
Amélie Mlynski ◽  
Xavier de Kerangal
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
In Situ Repair

Long-Term Follow-Up of Men Invited to Participate in a Population-Based Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening Program

Angiology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (7) ◽  
pp. 641-649
Author(s):  
Rebecka Hultgren ◽  
K. Miriam Elfström ◽  
Daniel Öhman ◽  
Anneli Linné
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Dropout Rate ◽  
Rupture Rate ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

A screening program for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), inviting 65-year-old men, was started in Stockholm in 2010 (2.3 million inhabitants). The aim was to present a long-term follow-up of men participating in screening, as well as AAA repair and ruptures among nonparticipants. Demographics were collected for men with screening detected with AAA 2010 to 2016 (n = 672) and a control group with normal aortas at screening (controls, n = 237). Medical charts and regional Swedvasc (Swedish Vascular registry) data were analyzed for aortic repair for men born 1945 to 1951. Ultrasound maximum aortic diameter (AD) as well as Aortic Size Index (ASI) was recorded. Participation was 78% and prevalence of AAA was 1.2% (n = 672). Aortic repair rates correlated with high ASI and AD. During the study period, 22% of the AAA patients were treated with the elective repair; 35 men in surveillance died (5.2%), non-AAA-related causes (82.9%) dominated, followed by unknown causes among 4 (11.4%), and 2 (5.7%) possibly AAA-related deaths. Abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture rate was higher among nonparticipants (0.096% vs 0.0036%, P < .001). The low dropout rate confirms acceptability of follow-up after screening. The efficacy is shown by the much higher rupture rate among the nonparticipating men.

Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Wall Stresses After Endovascular Repair

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena S. Di Martino ◽  
Michel S. Makaroun ◽  
David A. Vorp
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Careful Consideration ◽  
Aneurysm Wall ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Endovascular Approach

The early benefits of an endovascular approach to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) treatment has been reported by many authors [1,2]. One of the major advantages is that endovascular repair of AAA (EVAR) as opposed to traditional open surgery, is not a major abdominal surgery. EVAR has been shown to be associated with a death rate comparable to that of surgical repair [3]. In short term follow-up, EVAR is associated with fewer complications and a more rapid recovery [2]. On the contrary very limited data is available on long term follow-up of EVAR patients. Graft-related secondary interventions affect a consistent percentage of the treated cases. The EUROSTAR study [4] recently reported 13% of reintervention in 15.4 months. Our surgical unit reported 20.6% across 48 months in a recent review of 242 cases [3]. The frequence and type of reintervention, whose principal cause is endoleak or perigraft flow, requires careful consideration.

scholarly journals Abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: long-term follow-up of endovascular versus open repair

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 273-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriele Piffaretti ◽  
Giovanni Mariscalco ◽  
Francesca Riva ◽  
Federico Fontana ◽  
Gianpaolo Carrafiello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm ◽  
Open Repair ◽  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Aneurysm Repair ◽  
Aortic Aneurysm Repair
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document