Clinical Results of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Knot-Tying and Knotless Suture Anchors

2006 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 1276-1282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nam Su Cho ◽  
Andri M.T. Lubis ◽  
Jeong Han Ha ◽  
Yong Girl Rhee
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Results ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Knot Tying ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

scholarly journals Knot-Tying versus Knotless Suture Anchors for Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Comparative Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (8) ◽  
pp. 743
Author(s):  
Jae Woo Shim ◽  
Tae Wan Jung ◽  
Il Su Kim ◽  
Jae Chul Yoo
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Knot Tying ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

Arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors

1991 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugene M. Wolf ◽  
Richard M. Wilk ◽  
John C. Richmond
Keyword(s):  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

scholarly journals Arthroscopic Bankart repair with knotless suture anchors: A comparison of the permanent and absorbable types

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-207
Author(s):  
Abdulrahman D Algarni
Keyword(s):  
External Rotation ◽  
Shoulder Function ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Glenohumeral Instability ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Functional Scores ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair (ABR) using two types of knotless suture anchors (KSAs) in patients with post-traumatic recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability (AGHI). Methods: Thirty-two patients underwent an ABR using KSAs: a permanent KSA (PushLock) and an absorbable counterpart (BioKnotless). There were 16 patients in each group. Pre-and post-operative assessment for shoulder function using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons and Constant–Murley scores, recurrence of instability, post-operative limitation of external rotation (ER) and ability to return to pre-injury level were recorded in both groups. Results: Both groups displayed significant improvements in functional scores ( p < 0.0001) without a significant difference between the groups. Of the 32 patients, 9.4% had recurrence of instability (one re-dislocation in group 1 and two symptomatic subluxations in group 2). Return to pre-injury level occurred in 87.5% and 81.3% of group 1 and group 2, respectively. There was 2° to 3° loss of ER after ABR in both groups; the difference between the groups was not significant ( p = 0.45). Conclusion: ABR for recurrent AGHI using a permanent or absorbable KSA offers comparable successful outcomes; no significant statistical difference was found.

Arthroscopic Bankart repair with all-suture anchors does not cause important glenoid bone osteolysis: a volumetric CT study of 143 anchors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Angel Ruiz Ibán ◽  
Rosa Vega Rodriguez ◽  
Jorge Díaz Heredia ◽  
Roque Pérez Expósito ◽  
Irene Zarcos Paredes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Volumetric Ct

scholarly journals Functional outcome of arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability based on suture anchor configuration

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 301
Author(s):  
Madan Ballal ◽  
Tarun Jayakumar
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Shoulder Instability ◽  
Bankart Repair ◽  
Functional Improvement ◽  
Anterior Shoulder Instability ◽  
Suture Anchors ◽  
Arthroscopic Bankart Repair ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Functional Scores

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The objective of the study was to evaluate the functional outcome of arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior shoulder instability to assess whether the number and position of suture anchors plays a role in determining the functional outcome.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> This was a prospective study on 32 patients operated with arthroscopic Bankart repair between December 2017 to April 2019. Pre-op and regular follow-up scores were measured at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months post-op using Rowe score and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score to assess functional outcome.<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Mean age of the study group was 24.5±6.9 years. Functional outcome as determined by Rowe score and ASES score at 6 months follow-up were found to be 90.5±7.2 and 85.9±14.1 respectively when compared to the pre-op scores of 23.2±8.2 and 47.9±5.7 respectively; all of which showed highly significant functional improvement with highly significant reduction in visual analog scale (VAS) pain score. Patients had no recurrent dislocations with mean external rotation limitation of 5<sup>o</sup>. 25 (78.1%) patients had two suture anchors inserted and 7 (21.9%) patients had multiple (&gt;2) anchors; and when analysis was done, there was no statistically significant difference between number of suture anchors used with respect to the functional scores.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> We conclude that arthroscopic Bankart repair is a useful and successful procedure. Patient identification and selection remains the key in determining the success of repair. Meticulous surgical technique and correct positioning of suture anchors may help in reducing the number of anchors without compromising on the final functional outcome, thereby reducing the economic burden on patients.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document