Five- to 10-Year Results Using a Noncemented Modular Revision Stem Without Bone Grafting

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 964-970 ◽  
Author(s):  
Georg Köster ◽  
Tim A. Walde ◽  
Hans-Georg Willert
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Revision Stem ◽  
Modular Revision Stem

Hip Revision Arthroplasty of Periprosthetic Fractures Vancouver B2 and B3 with a Modular Revision Stem: Short-Term Results and Review of Literature

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Janine Schreiner ◽  
Christoph Steidle ◽  
Florian Schmidutz ◽  
Christoph Gonser ◽  
Philipp Hemmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fracture Healing ◽  
Current Literature ◽  
Periprosthetic Fractures ◽  
Harris Hip Score ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Transfemoral Approach ◽  
Hip Revision ◽  
Revision Stem ◽  
Modular Revision Stem

Abstract Background Periprosthetic fractures Vancouver type B2/B3 after total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a challenging entity with increasing numbers. Limited data are available for this type of fracture treated with modular stems. Therefore, this study evaluated the outcome of Vancouver type B2/B3 fractures treated with a modular hip revision stem using a subproximal/distal anchorage and compared it to the current literature. Materials and Methods A consecutive series of periprosthetic Vancouver type B2/B3 fractures treated with a modular revision stem was retrospectively (2013 – 2016) evaluated. Assessment included the clinical (HHS, pain, ROM) as well as the radiological outcome (subsidence, loosening, facture healing). In adddition, the surgical technique is described in detail and results are compared with the current literature. Results A total of 18 patients (female/male 12/6) with Vancouver B2/B3 (n = 12/6) fractures with a mean age of 75.5 (60 – 89) years were included. The revision stem was inserted via a modified transgluteal approach (n = 16) or classical transfemoral approach (n = 2). The mean follow-up was 18.5 months, with a mean Harris Hip Score of 72.5 ± 18.7 (35.0 – 99.0) points. The fracture healing rate was 94.4% (n = 17) with osseous integration according to Engh in all cases. Dislocations of the greater trochanter were recorded in seven patients (38.9%). According to Beals and Towers, all results were rated excellent or good. No implant-related failure or relevant subsidence during this time was observed. Major complications were observed in five patients with two periprosthetic joint infections and two cases of major revision surgery. Conclusion This study assessing Vancouver B2/3 fractures shows reproducible, good, short-term results in terms of subsidence and clinical functional outcome by the use of a modular revision stem. The transfemoral approach together with the modular stem allows for a stable fixation and good fracture healing. However, our data and review of the literature also documents the difficulties and higher complication rate associated with Vancouver B2/3 fractures.

Secondary (Intermediate) Alveolar Bone Grafting

1993 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 691-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mimis Cohen ◽  
John W. Polley ◽  
Alvaro A. Figueroa
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Alveolar Bone Grafting

The Potential of Bone Debris as a Bioactive Composite for Bone Grafting in Arthroscopic Ankle Arthrodesis

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
pp. 1234-1238
Author(s):  
Tomoyuki Nakasa ◽  
Yasunari Ikuta ◽  
Yuki Ota ◽  
Munekazu Kanemitsu ◽  
Junichi Sumii ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Grafting ◽  
Ankle Arthrodesis

Midterm Results of Wagner Revision Stem

2003 ◽  
Vol 141 (S 1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Papoutsakis ◽  
P Megas ◽  
P Zouboulis ◽  
E Lambiris
Keyword(s):  
Midterm Results ◽  
Revision Stem
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document