Interrater reliability of the interRAI Acute Care (interRAI AC)

2012 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie I.H. Wellens ◽  
Aurélie Van Lancker ◽  
Johan Flamaing ◽  
Len Gray ◽  
Philip Moons ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Martina Madl ◽  
Marietta Lieb ◽  
Katharina Schieber ◽  
Tobias Hepp ◽  
Yesim Erim

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Due to the establishment of a nationwide certification system for cancer centers in Germany, the availability of psycho-oncological services for cancer patients has increased substantially. However, little is known about the specific intervention techniques that are applied during sessions in an acute care hospital, since a standardized taxonomy is lacking. With this study, we aimed at the investigation of psycho-oncological intervention techniques and the development of a comprehensive and structured taxonomy thereof. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In a stepwise procedure, a team of psycho-oncologists generated a data pool of interventions and definitions that were tested in clinical practice during a pilot phase. After an adaptation of intervention techniques, interrater reliability (IRR) was attained by rating 10 previously recorded psycho-oncological sessions. A classification of interventions into superordinate categories was performed, supported by cluster analysis. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Between April and June 2017, 980 psycho-oncological sessions took place. The experts agreed on a total number of 22 intervention techniques. An IRR of 89% for 2 independent psycho-oncological raters was reached. The 22 techniques were classified into 5 superordinate categories. <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> We developed a comprehensive and structured taxonomy of psycho-oncological intervention techniques in an acute care hospital that provides a standardized basis for systematic research and applied care. We expect our work to be continuously subjected to further development: future research should evaluate and expand our taxonomy to other contexts and care settings.


2017 ◽  
Vol 65 (9) ◽  
pp. 2029-2036 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melinda G. Martin-Khan ◽  
Helen Edwards ◽  
Richard Wootton ◽  
Steven R. Counsell ◽  
Paul Varghese ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth E Hubbard ◽  
Nancye M Peel ◽  
Mayukh Samanta ◽  
Leonard C Gray ◽  
Brant E Fries ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 695-700 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salih A. Salih ◽  
S. Paul ◽  
K. Klein ◽  
P. Lakhan ◽  
L. Gray

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 476-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie I. H. Wellens ◽  
Mieke Deschodt ◽  
Steven Boonen ◽  
Johan Flamaing ◽  
Len Gray ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 084456212092051
Author(s):  
Veronique Boscart ◽  
Linda Sheiban Taucar ◽  
Michelle Heyer ◽  
Tabitha Kellendonk ◽  
Keia Johnson ◽  
...  

Background Older adults are the biggest users of emergency departments and hospitals. However, healthcare professionals are often ill equipped to conduct comprehensive geriatric assessments causing missed opportunities for preventing adverse outcomes. Purpose To evaluate the inter-rater reliability of the interRAI Acute Care (AC) instrument for hospitalized older adults in two acute care hospitals in Ontario, Canada. Methods This descriptive study focused on evaluating the interRAI AC instrument, which was designed to facilitate a comprehensive nursing assessment for hospitalized seniors. Sample characteristics were described, and Cohen’s Kappa was calculated to derive the inter-rater reliability. Assessment times to complete the instrument were collected as well. Results The Cohen’s Kappa score for the instrument was 0.96. Many older adults who were interviewed had several challenges, including multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and lack of home support. The average time required for nurses to complete the interRAI AC instrument was 22 min. Conclusions The interRAI AC instrument is reliable for use by trained nurses to conduct a comprehensive assessment. This instrument offers a standardized and efficient approach to assess for care and intervention priorities and could prevent adverse outcomes in hospitalized older adults.


2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 822-827 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie I. H. Wellens ◽  
Koen Milisen ◽  
Johan Flamaing ◽  
Philip Moons

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document