Activities and Participation After Burn Injury as Defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A Systematic Review

2016 ◽  
Vol 97 (12) ◽  
pp. e37
Author(s):  
Candice Osborne ◽  
Walter J. Meyer ◽  
Kenneth J. Ottenbacher ◽  
Christina M. Arcari
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Burn Injury ◽  
International Classification ◽  
International Classification Of Functioning ◽  
Disability And Health

scholarly journals Developing a Delphi-Based Comprehensive Core Set from the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Framework for the Rehabilitation of Patients with Burn Injuries

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 3970
Author(s):  
Yu-Ru Lin ◽  
Jr-Yi Wang ◽  
Shun-Cheng Chang ◽  
Kwang-Hwa Chang ◽  
Hung-Chou Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Burn Injury ◽  
Functional Limitations ◽  
Rehabilitation Program ◽  
International Classification ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
International Classification Of Functioning ◽  
Disability And Health ◽  
The Core ◽  
Core Set

Burn injuries cause disability and functional limitations in daily living. In a 2015 fire explosion in Taiwan, 499 young people sustained burn injuries. The construction of an effective and comprehensive rehabilitation program that enables patients to regain their previous function is imperative. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) includes multiple dimensions that can contribute to meeting this goal. An ICF core set was developed in this study for Taiwanese patients with burns. A consensus process using three rounds of the Delphi technique was employed. A multidisciplinary team of 30 experts from various institutions was formed. The questionnaire used in this study comprised 162 ICF second-level categories relevant to burn injuries. A 5-point Likert scale was used, and participants assigned a weight to the effect of each category on daily activities after burns. The consensus among ratings was assessed using Spearman’s ρ and semi-interquartile range indices. The core set for post-acute SCI was developed from categories that attained a mean score of ≥4.0 in the third round of the Delphi exercise. The core ICF set contained 68 categories. Of these, 19 comprised the component of body functions, 5 comprised body structures, 37 comprised activities and participation, and 7 comprised environmental factors. This preliminary core set offers a comprehensive system for disability assessment and verification following burn injury. The core set provides information for effective rehabilitation strategy setting for patients with burns. Further feasibility and validation studies are required in the future.

scholarly journals The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: a systematic review of observational studies

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 437-451 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana Castaneda ◽  
Anke Bergmann ◽  
Ligia Bahia
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Qualitative Methodology ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
International Classification ◽  
International Classification Of Functioning ◽  
Disability And Health ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Core Set

Objective: To systematically review the use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in observational studies. Methods: This study is a systematic review of articles that use the ICF in observational studies. We took into account the observational design papers available in databases such as PubMed, Lilacs and SciELO, published in English and Portuguese from January 2001 to June 2011. We excluded those in which the samples did not comprise individuals, those about children and adolescents, and qualitative methodology articles. After reading the abstracts of 265 identified articles, 65 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 18 were excluded. The STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) adapted Checklist, with 15 items needed for observational studies, was applied to the 47 remaining articles. Any paper that met 12 of these criteria was included in this systematic review. Results: 29 articles were reviewed. Regarding the ICF application methodology, the checklist was used in 31% of the articles, the core set in 31% and the ICF categories in 31%. In the remaining 7%, it was not possible to define the applied methodology. In most papers (41%), qualifiers were used in their original format. As far as the area of knowledge is concerned, most of the studies were related to Rheumatology (24%) and Orthopedics (21%). Regarding the study design, 83% of the articles used cross-sectional studies. Conclusion: Results indicate a wide scientific production related to ICF over the past 10 years. Different areas of knowledge are involved in the debate on the improvement of information on morbidity. However, there are only a few quantitative epidemiological studies involving the use of ICF. Future studies are needed to improve data related to functioning and disability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document