Modulation of the Sleep State–Dependent P50 Midlatency Auditory-Evoked Potential by Electric Stimulation of Acupuncture Points

2005 ◽  
Vol 86 (10) ◽  
pp. 2018-2026 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia A. Bray ◽  
Noriaki Mamiya ◽  
Alice V. Fann ◽  
Harris Gellman ◽  
Robert D. Skinner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electric Stimulation ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Auditory Evoked Potential ◽  
Acupuncture Points ◽  
Sleep State ◽  
State Dependent ◽  
Stimulation Of

Propofol suppresses the sleep state-dependent P13 midlatency auditory evoked potential in the rat

2003 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuko Homma ◽  
Luis Teneud ◽  
Robert D Skinner ◽  
Keith Williams ◽  
Edgar Garcia-Rill
Keyword(s):  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Auditory Evoked Potential ◽  
Sleep State ◽  
State Dependent

Cholinergic modulation of the sleep state-dependent P13 midlatency auditory evoked potential in the rat

2000 ◽  
Vol 884 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 196-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luis Teneud ◽  
Hiroshi Miyazato ◽  
Robert D. Skinner ◽  
Edgar Garcia-Rill
Keyword(s):  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Auditory Evoked Potential ◽  
Cholinergic Modulation ◽  
Sleep State ◽  
State Dependent

Effects of rotation on the P13 mid-latency auditory evoked potential in Rat

2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 117-125
Author(s):  
Yuko Homma ◽  
Yutaka Homma ◽  
Luis Teneud ◽  
Robert D. Skinner ◽  
John Dornhoffer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Auditory Evoked Potential ◽  
Paired Stimulus ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Sleep State ◽  
Space Motion Sickness ◽  
State Dependent ◽  
Space Motion ◽  
Reticular Activating System ◽  
Effects Of Rotation

The P13 mid-latency auditory evoked potential in Rat is a sleep state-dependent response thought to be equivalent to the human P50 potential, a measure of the output of the reticular activating system. The amplitude of these potentials can be considered a measure of level of arousal, while, using a paired stimulus paradigm, the degree of habituation of the responses also can be assessed. Different durations of rotation were found to reduce the amplitude of the P13 potential, which recovered in a duration-dependent manner. Different durations of rotation led to decreases in habituation of the P13 potential again in a duration-dependent manner. These results suggest that rotation may affect the level of arousal as well as habituation to repetitive sensory inputs. Such effects could be interpreted to imply the presence, following rotation of sufficient duration, of a deficit in sensory gating, or distractibility, and are relevant for the study of the effects of space motion sickness.

scholarly journals Optogenetic Stimulation of Adrenergic C1 Neurons Causes Sleep State–Dependent Cardiorespiratory Stimulation and Arousal with Sighs in Rats

2014 ◽  
Vol 190 (11) ◽  
pp. 1301-1310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter G. R. Burke ◽  
B. Stephen ◽  
Melissa B. Coates ◽  
Kenneth E. Viar ◽  
Ruth L. Stornetta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sleep State ◽  
Optogenetic Stimulation ◽  
State Dependent ◽  
Stimulation Of

Geophysical Variables and Behavior: XL. Electromagnetic Stimulation of ‘Extrasensory’ Evoked Potentials

1987 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 1015-1018
Author(s):  
Robert G. Kunzendorf
Keyword(s):  
Evoked Potentials ◽  
Signal Detection ◽  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Cortical Response ◽  
Auditory Evoked Potential ◽  
Electromagnetic Stimulation ◽  
Long Latency ◽  
Psychophysiological Testing ◽  
And Behavior ◽  
Stimulation Of

In psychophysiological testing with 10 subjects, an electromagnetic stimulus evoked a long-latency cortical response similar to the long-latency component (P300) of an auditory evoked potential. On a signal-detection test, the electromagnet elicited no conscious sensations.

scholarly journals Frequency-Following Response with Speech Stimulus: Comparison between Two Methods of Stimulation

2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (04) ◽  
pp. e396-e402
Author(s):  
Taissane Rodrigues Sanguebuche ◽  
Luize Caroline Lima da Silva ◽  
Bruna Pias Peixe ◽  
Débora Durigon da Silva ◽  
Michele Vargas Garcia
Keyword(s):  
Evoked Potential ◽  
Auditory Evoked Potential ◽  
Speech Stimulus ◽  
Speech Comprehension ◽  
Stimulation Protocol ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Frequency Following Response ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Waves ◽  
Stimulation Of

Introduction Frequency-following response with speech stimulus (FFR-speech) is a subcortical potential that satisfactorily evaluates the processing of verbal information. However, there still are differences in the literature regarding its analysis and stimulation protocol. Objective To compare two stimulation protocols for the capture of FFR-speech, to identify the percentage of occurrence of the waves among them and to compare it with the specialized literature, as well as to describe the interpeaks of its waves. Method Considering the eligibility criteria, the sample consisted of 30 normal-hearing adults, with no complaints of speech comprehension. All of them were submitted to a basic audiological evaluation, to brainstem auditory evoked potential with click stimulus, and to FFR-speech. In the latter, 2 types of stimulation were performed, 3 series of 1,000 sweeps, and 2 series of 3,000 sweeps, for subsequent analysis of the resulting wave, in which we tried to mark the peak V followed by valleys A, C, D, E, F, and O. Results Differences in latency and interpeaks were not found between the protocols. In general, a higher occurrence of waves in the stimulation of 2 series of 3,000 sweeps was observed, but only the A valley presented a significant difference. When the values of the waves were compared with the literature, the V and A waves showed fewer occurrences in the present study. Conclusion The protocol of 2 series of 3,000 sweeps was better for FFR-speech in the studied equipment, considering the higher occurrence of waves, even though it is inferior to the specialized literature. Furthermore, it was possible to describe interpeak values and to observe no difference between the studied protocols

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document