Score comparability of short forms and computerized adaptive testing: simulation study with the activity measure for post-acute care

2004 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. 661-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen M Haley ◽  
Wendy J Coster ◽  
Patricia L Andres ◽  
Mark Kosinski ◽  
Pengsheng Ni
2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Angélica Peixoto De Souza ◽  
Marisa Cotta Mancini ◽  
Wendy Jane Coster ◽  
Renata Noce Kirkwood ◽  
Elyonara Mello De Figueiredo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 073428292110277
Author(s):  
Ioannis Tsaousis ◽  
Georgios D. Sideridis ◽  
Hannan M. AlGhamdi

This study evaluated the psychometric quality of a computerized adaptive testing (CAT) version of the general cognitive ability test (GCAT), using a simulation study protocol put forth by Han, K. T. (2018a). For the needs of the analysis, three different sets of items were generated, providing an item pool of 165 items. Before evaluating the efficiency of the GCAT, all items in the final item pool were linked (equated), following a sequential approach. Data were generated using a standard normal for 10,000 virtual individuals ( M = 0 and SD = 1). Using the measure’s 165-item bank, the ability value (θ) for each participant was estimated. maximum Fisher information (MFI) and maximum likelihood estimation with fences (MLEF) were used as item selection and score estimation methods, respectively. For item exposure control, the fade away method (FAM) was preferred. The termination criterion involved a minimum SE ≤ 0.33. The study revealed that the average number of items administered for 10,000 participants was 15. Moreover, the precision level in estimating the participant’s ability score was very high, as demonstrated by the CBIAS, CMAE, and CRMSE). It is concluded that the CAT version of the test is a promising alternative to administering the corresponding full-length measure since it reduces the number of administered items, prevents high rates of item exposure, and provides accurate scores with minimum measurement error.


2020 ◽  
Vol 100 (9) ◽  
pp. 1423-1433
Author(s):  
Stephanie Covert ◽  
Joshua K Johnson ◽  
Mary Stilphen ◽  
Sandra Passek ◽  
Nicolas R Thompson ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective Therapists in the hospital are charged with making timely discharge recommendations to improve access to rehabilitation after stroke. The objective of this study was to identify the predictive ability of the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care “6 Clicks” Basic Mobility Inpatient Short Form (6 Clicks mobility) score and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score for actual hospital discharge disposition after stroke. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, data were collected from an academic hospital in the United States for 1543 patients with acute stroke and a 6 Clicks mobility score. Discharge to home, a skilled nursing facility (SNF), or an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) was the primary outcome. Associations among these outcomes and 6 Clicks mobility and NIHSS scores, alone or together, were tested using multinomial logistic regression, and the predictive ability of these scores was calculated using concordance statistics. Results A higher 6 Clicks mobility score alone was associated with a decreased odds of actual discharge to an IRF or an SNF. The 6 Clicks mobility score alone was a strong predictor of discharge to home versus an IRF or an SNF. However, predicting discharge to an IRF versus an SNF was stronger when the 6 Clicks mobility score was considered in combination with the NIHSS score, age, sex, and race. Conclusion The 6 Clicks mobility score alone can guide discharge decision making after stroke, particularly for discharge to home versus an SNF or an IRF. Determining discharge to an SNF versus an IRF could be improved by also considering the NIHSS score, age, sex, and race. Future studies should seek to identify which additional characteristics improve predictability for these separate discharge destinations. Impact The use of outcome measures can improve therapist confidence in making discharge recommendations for people with stroke, can enhance hospital throughput, and can expedite access to rehabilitation, ultimately affecting functional outcomes.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 231-239
Author(s):  
Pollyana Ruggio Tristão Borges ◽  
Rosana Ferreira Sampaio ◽  
Renata Noce Kirkwood ◽  
Mariana Angélica Peixoto de Souza ◽  
Marisa Cotta Mancini ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 2061-2066 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAMES F. FRIES ◽  
DAVID CELLA ◽  
MATTHIAS ROSE ◽  
ESWAR KRISHNAN ◽  
BONNIE BRUCE

Objective.Assessing self-reported physical function/disability with the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ) and other instruments has become central in arthritis research. Item response theory (IRT) and computerized adaptive testing (CAT) techniques can increase reliability and statistical power. IRT-based instruments can improve measurement precision substantially over a wider range of disease severity. These modern methods were applied and the magnitude of improvement was estimated.Methods.A 199-item physical function/disability item bank was developed by distilling 1865 items to 124, including Legacy Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Physical Function-10 items, and improving precision through qualitative and quantitative evaluation in over 21,000 subjects, which included about 1500 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Four new instruments, (A) Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information (PROMIS) HAQ, which evolved from the original (Legacy) HAQ; (B) “best” PROMIS 10; (C) 20-item static (short) forms; and (D) simulated PROMIS CAT, which sequentially selected the most informative item, were compared with the HAQ.Results.Online and mailed administration modes yielded similar item and domain scores. The HAQ and PROMIS HAQ 20-item scales yielded greater information content versus other scales in patients with more severe disease. The “best” PROMIS 20-item scale outperformed the other 20-item static forms over a broad range of 4 standard deviations. The 10-item simulated PROMIS CAT outperformed all other forms.Conclusion.Improved items and instruments yielded better information. The PROMIS HAQ is currently available and considered validated. The new PROMIS short forms, after validation, are likely to represent further improvement. CAT-based physical function/disability assessment offers superior performance over static forms of equal length.


2017 ◽  
Vol 40 (21) ◽  
pp. 2571-2576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng-Hang Chang ◽  
Tsan-Hon Liou ◽  
John Brodersen ◽  
Jonathan D. Comins

2011 ◽  
Vol 92 (10) ◽  
pp. 1694
Author(s):  
Alan Jette ◽  
Pengsheng Ni ◽  
Elizabeth Rasch ◽  
Jed Appelman ◽  
M. Elizabeth Sandel ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document