scholarly journals A note on the stability of Toeplitz matrix inversion formulas

2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. 903-907 ◽  
Author(s):  
You-Wei Wen ◽  
Michael K. Ng ◽  
Wai-Ki Ching ◽  
Hong Liu
1973 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 234-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirotugu Akaike

1995 ◽  
Vol 223-224 ◽  
pp. 307-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin H. Gutknecht ◽  
Marlis Hochbruck

2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhao-Lin Jiang ◽  
Xiao-Ting Chen ◽  
Jian-Min Wang

AbstractIn this paper, we consider two innovative structured matrices, CUPL-Toeplitz matrix and CUPL-Hankel matrix. The inverses of CUPL-Toeplitz and CUPL-Hankel matrices can be expressed by the Gohberg-Heinig type formulas, and the stability of the inverse matrices is verified in terms of 1-, ∞- and 2-norms, respectively. In addition, two algorithms for the inverses of CUPL-Toeplitz and CUPL-Hankel matrices are given and examples are provided to verify the feasibility of these algorithms.


1982 ◽  
Vol 99 ◽  
pp. 605-613
Author(s):  
P. S. Conti

Conti: One of the main conclusions of the Wolf-Rayet symposium in Buenos Aires was that Wolf-Rayet stars are evolutionary products of massive objects. Some questions:–Do hot helium-rich stars, that are not Wolf-Rayet stars, exist?–What about the stability of helium rich stars of large mass? We know a helium rich star of ∼40 MO. Has the stability something to do with the wind?–Ring nebulae and bubbles : this seems to be a much more common phenomenon than we thought of some years age.–What is the origin of the subtypes? This is important to find a possible matching of scenarios to subtypes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document