Precision of manual landmark identification between as-received and oriented volume-rendered cone-beam computed tomography images

2017 ◽  
Vol 151 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abhishek Gupta ◽  
Om Prakash Kharbanda ◽  
Rajiv Balachandran ◽  
Viren Sardana ◽  
Shilpa Kalra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Computed Tomography Images ◽  
Landmark Identification

scholarly journals Reproducibility of landmark identification in the jaw and teeth on 3-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography images

2011 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. 843-849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariko Fuyamada ◽  
Hiroyuki Nawa ◽  
Momoko Shibata ◽  
Kazuhito Yoshida ◽  
Yoshitaka Kise ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Volume Data ◽  
3D Images ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Computed Tomography Images ◽  
Landmark Identification ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Objective: To compare the reproducibility of landmark identification on three-dimensional (3D) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images between procedures based on traditional cephalometric definitions (procedure 1) and those tentatively proposed for 3D images (procedure 2). Materials and Methods: A phantom with embedded dried human skull was scanned using CBCT. The acquired volume data were transferred to a personal computer, and 3D images were reconstructed. Eighteen dentists plotted nine landmarks related to the jaws and teeth four times: menton (Me), pogonion (Po), upper-1 (U1), lower-1 (L1), left upper-6 (U6), left lower-6 (L6), gonion (Go), condyle (Cd), and coronoid process (Cp). The plotting reliabilities of the two procedures were compared by calculating standard deviations (SDs) in three components (x, y, and z) of coordinates and volumes of 95% confidence ellipsoid. Results: All 27 SDs for procedure 2 were less than 1 mm, and only five of them exceeded 0.5 mm. The variations were significantly different between the two procedures, and the SDs of procedure 2 were smaller than those of procedure 1 in 21 components of coordinates. The ellipsoid volumes were also smaller for procedure 2 than procedure 1, although a significant difference was not found. Conclusions: Definitions determined strictly on each three sectional images, such as for procedure 2, were required for sufficient reliability in identifying the landmark related to the jaws and teeth.

scholarly journals Oral and maxillofacial anatomical structures acknowledgment through cone beam computed tomography images – a teaching practice experience

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-171
Author(s):  
Solange Kobayashi-Velasco ◽  
Fernanda Cristina Sales Salineiro ◽  
Ivan Onone Gialain ◽  
Wellington Hideaki Yanaguizawa ◽  
Marcelo Gusmão Paraiso Cavalcanti
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Teaching Practice ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Anatomical Structures ◽  
Practice Experience ◽  
Computed Tomography Images

O objetivo deste estudo foi relatar uma metodologia de ensino de tomografia computadorizada de feixe cônico (TCFC) aplicada a estudantes de graduação, avaliando o conhecimento de estruturas anatômicas do complexo dentomaxilofacial. Os estudantes foram orientados quanto às estruturas anatômicas e às aplicações clínicas da TCFC em aulas teóricas e práticas, compreendendo 45 horas de aula. Foram submetidos a duas avaliações, a primeira na metade do semestre, e a segunda no término do semestre. Os escores das avaliações (três variáveis: 1) nome, 2) lado - esquerdo/direito e 3) reconstruções multiplanares (RMP) - imagens ortogonais de identificação) foram comparados para verificar se houve melhora na aprendizagem. Testes de medianas e Wilcoxon compararam os exames intermediário e final. Os valores medianos para a variável 1 foram 6,0 (intermediário) e 8,0 (final). Em relação à variável 2, a mediana variou de 9,0 (intermediário) a 10,0 (final). Quando os resultados da variável 3 foram analisados, ambas as medianas foram 10,0. Houve diferença significativa (teste de Wilcoxon, p<0,05) quando foram comparados os exames intermediário e final, nas três categorias. Correlações lineares foram estabelecidas entre as três categorias e foram estatisticamente significantes para duas associações (“nome da estrutura anatômica” com “lado da estrutura anatômica” e “nome da estrutura anatômica” com “imagens da MPR”). Os estudantes de graduação apresentaram uma melhora em termos do reconhecimento correto das estruturas anatômicas, nome e lado, bem como imagens de MPR quando comparadas as duas avaliações.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document