In-vivo prospective comparison of bond failure rates of 2 self-etching primer/adhesive systems

2007 ◽  
Vol 132 (5) ◽  
pp. 671-674 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Pasquale ◽  
Martin Weinstein ◽  
Alan J. Borislow ◽  
Leonard E. Braitman
Keyword(s):  
Failure Rates ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Bond Failure ◽  
Prospective Comparison

scholarly journals Clinical bond failure rates of adhesive precoated self-ligating brackets using a self-etching primer

2013 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. 155-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mete Ozer ◽  
Mehmet Bayram ◽  
Cagri Dincyurek ◽  
Fuat Tokalak
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rates ◽  
Surface Preparation ◽  
Failure Rates ◽  
Bond Failure ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Combined Use ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Time

ABSTRACT Objective: To comparatively assess the failure rate of adhesive precoated (APC) self-ligating metal brackets bonded with two different enamel surface preparation techniques: self-etching primer (SEP) and conventional two-step etch and primer method (CM). Materials and Methods: Fifty-seven patients with complete permanent dentition were included in this study. A total of 1140 APC self-ligating brackets (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) were bonded using a split-mouth design. For each patient, SEP (Transbond Plus SEP, 3M Unitek) and CM (37% phosphoric acid) were used in alternate quadrants. All brackets were bonded by the same investigator after pumicing and rinsing of all of the teeth. The number, site, and date of first-time bracket failures were monitored throughout orthodontic treatment (mean, 22 months). The survival rates of the brackets were estimated by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests (P < .05). The adhesive remnant index was used to determine the bond failure interface. Results: The bond failure rates were 2.97% and 2.18% for the CM and SEP, respectively. No statistically significant difference in failure rates was found between the groups. The bond failure sites were predominantly at the enamel-adhesive interface in both groups. Conclusion: This long-term in vivo study showed that the combined use of SEP and the APC bracket system can be used effectively for bonding brackets after pumicing the enamel surfaces in clinical orthodontics.

scholarly journals Clinical Evaluation of Bracket Bonding Using Two Different Polymerization Sources

2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. 922-925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos S. Koupis ◽  
Theodore Eliades ◽  
Athanasios E. Athanasiou
Keyword(s):  
Failure Rate ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Light Emitting Diode ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Halogen Lamp ◽  
Failure Rates ◽  
Bond Failure ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Right

Abstract Objective: To comparatively assess clinical failure rate of brackets cured with two different photopolymerization sources after nine months of orthodontic treatment. Materials and Methods: The sample of this study comprised 30 patients who received comprehensive orthodontic treatment by means of fixed appliances. Using the same adhesive, 600 stainless steel brackets were directly bonded and light cured for 10 seconds with the light-emitting diode (LED) lamp or for 20 seconds with the conventional halogen lamp. A split-mouth design randomly alternated from patient to patient was applied. Failure rates were recorded for nine months and analyzed with Pearson χ2 test, and log-rank test at α = .05 level of significance. Results: The overall failure rate recorded with the halogen unit (3.33%) was not significantly different from the failure rate for the LED lamp (5.00%). Significantly more failures were found in boys compared with girls, in the mandibular dental arch compared with the maxillary arch, and in posterior segments compared with anterior segments. However, no significant difference was found between the right and left segments. Conclusion: Both light-curing units showed sufficiently low bond failure rates. LED curing units are an advantageous alternative to conventional halogen sources in orthodontics because they enable a reduced chair-time bonding procedure without significantly affecting bond failure rate.

scholarly journals Clinical evaluation of the failure rate of metallic brackets bonded with orthodontic composites

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 399-402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fábio Lourenço Romano ◽  
Rodrigo Alexandre Valério ◽  
Jaciara Miranda Gomes-Silva ◽  
José Tarcísio Lima Ferreira ◽  
Gisele Faria ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Failure Rate ◽  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Color Change ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Initial Alignment ◽  
Bond Failure ◽  
Log Rank Test ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Mandibular Teeth

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate in vivo the failure rate of metallic brackets bonded with two orthodontic composites. Nineteen patients with ages ranging from 10.5 to 38.7 years needing corrective orthodontic treatment were selected for study. The enamel surfaces from second premolars to second premolars were treated with Transbond Plus-Self Etching Primer (3M Unitek). Next, 380 orthodontic brackets were bonded on maxillary and mandibular teeth, as follows: 190 with Transbond XT composite (3M Unitek) (control) and 190 with Transbond Plus Color Change (3M Unitek) (experimental) in contralateral quadrants. The bonded brackets were light cured for 40 s, and initial alignment archwires were inserted. Bond failure rates were recorded over a six-month period. At the end of the evaluation, six bond failures occurred, three for each composite. Kaplan-Meyer method and log-rank test (Mantel-Cox) was used for statistical analysis, and no statistically significant difference was found between the materials (p=0.999). Both Transbond XT and Transbond Plus Color Change composites had low debonding rates over the study period.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Bond Failure Rate of Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with Green Gloo-Two Way Color Changes Adhesive: A Clinical Study

1970 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zuber Ahamed Naqvi ◽  
Saleem Shaikh ◽  
Zameer Pasha
Keyword(s):  
Failure Rate ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Dental Arch ◽  
Failure Rates ◽  
Bond Failure ◽  
Color Changes ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference

BACKGROUND: Bonding is an important step in fixed orthodontic mechanotherapy. Many new materials introduced an adhesive for bonding. This study was designed to evaluate the clinical bond failure rate of orthodontic brackets bonded with green glue: two way color changes adhesive and transbond XT adhesive paste.METHODS: Eighteen male patients with a mean age of 16 years were included in the study. Convenience sampling technique was used to select the sample for this study. The split-mouth design was used to bond 360 brackets by one operator and both adhesives were used in each patient. Bond failure rates were estimated with respect to bonding procedure, dental arch, tooth type (incisor, canine, and premolar). The results were evaluated using the chisquare test. Kaplan – Meier analysis and the log rank test were used to estimate the survival rate of the brackets. Bracket failure rates for each system were analyzed, and failure causes as reported by the patients and the quadrant of each tooth in which bracketsfailed were recorded.RESULTS: The bond failure rate was 5.00% and 4.44% for green gloo and transbond XT group. No significant difference was found in the bond failure rate between transbond XT and Green gloo group. No significant difference was found in the bond failure rate between the two groups, in relation to right and left side and the type of teeth.CONCLUSION: Green gloo adhesive can be effectively used to bond orthodontic brackets.

scholarly journals In Vivo Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets to Fluorosed Enamel using an Adhesion Promotor

2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 357-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Noble ◽  
Nicholas E. Karaiskos ◽  
William A. Wiltshire
Keyword(s):  
Dental Fluorosis ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Aluminum Silicate ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Adhesion Promoter ◽  
Bond Failure ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Chi Square Analysis

Abstract Objectives: To determine the success of bracket retention using an adhesion promoter with and without the additional microabrasion of enamel. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two teeth with severe dental fluorosis were bonded in vivo using a split-mouth design where the enamel surfaces of 26 teeth were microabraded with 50 μm of aluminum silicate for 5 seconds under rubber dam and high volume suction. Thirty-seven percent phosphoric acid was then applied to the enamel, washed and dried, and followed by placement of Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus Bonding Adhesive. Finally, precoated 3M Unitek Victory brackets were placed and light cured. The remaining teeth were bonded using the same protocol but without microabrasion. Results: After 9 months of intraoral service, only one bond failure occurred in the control group where microabrasion was used. Chi-square analysis revealed P = .31, indicating no statistical significance between the two groups. Conclusions: Bonding orthodontic attachments to fluorosed enamel using an adhesion promoter is a viable clinical procedure that does not require the additional micro-mechanical abrasion step.

High Resolution Manometry is Superior to Endoscopy and Radiology in Assessing and Grading Sliding Hiatal Hernia. A Prospective Comparison with Surgical in vivo

2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salvatore Tolone ◽  
Edoardo V. Savarino ◽  
Giovanni Zaninotto ◽  
Nicola de Bortoli ◽  
Manuele Furnari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Hiatal Hernia ◽  
High Resolution Manometry ◽  
Prospective Comparison ◽  
Sliding Hiatal Hernia

scholarly journals Shear Bond Strength of Brackets Rebonded with a Fluoride-Releasing and -Recharging Adhesive System

2009 ◽  
Vol 79 (3) ◽  
pp. 564-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiya Endo ◽  
Rieko Ozoe ◽  
Koichi Shinkai ◽  
Makiko Aoyagi ◽  
Hiroomi Kurokawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Failure Modes ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Adhesive System ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Bond Failure ◽  
Minimum Requirement ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Bond Strengths

Abstract Objective: To ascertain the effects of repeated bonding on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with a fluoride-releasing and -recharging adhesive system with a self-etching primer in comparison with two other types of adhesive system. Materials and Methods: A total of 48 premolars were collected and divided equally into three groups of 16. Each group was assigned one of three adhesive systems: Transbond XT, Transbond Plus, or a fluoride-releasing and -recharging adhesive system, Beauty Ortho Bond. Shear bond strength was measured 24 hours after bracket bonding, with the bonding/debonding procedures repeated twice after the first debonding. A universal testing machine was used to determine shear bond strengths, and bracket/adhesive failure modes were evaluated with the adhesive remnant index after each debonding. Results: At every debonding sequence, all of these three adhesive systems had a shear bond strength of 6 MPa, which is a minimum requirement for clinical use. Transbond XT and Transbond Plus had significantly higher mean shear bond strengths than did Beauty Ortho Bond at each debonding. No significant differences in mean bond strength were observed between the three debondings in each adhesive system. Bond failure at the enamel/adhesive interface occurred more frequently in Beauty Ortho Bond than in Transbond XT or Transbond Plus. Conclusions: The fluoride-releasing and -recharging adhesive system with the self-etching primer (Beauty Ortho Bond) had clinically sufficient shear bond strength in repeated bracket bonding; this finding can help orthodontists to decrease the risk of damage to enamel at debonding.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document