Evaluation of a New Flexible Mounting Dispenser to Improve Point of Care Product Access in an Acute Care Hospital and the Resulting Effect on Hand Hygiene Compliance Rates

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. e61 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Hand Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Care Product ◽  
Resulting Effect ◽  
Hygiene Compliance

Hand hygiene promotion delivered by change agents—Two attitudes, similar outcome

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 273-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yew Fong Lee ◽  
Mary-Louise McLaws ◽  
Loke Meng Ong ◽  
Suraya Amir Husin ◽  
Hock Hin Chua ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Hand Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Change Agents ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Hand Hygiene Improvement ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hygiene Promotion ◽  
Hygiene Compliance

AbstractObjective:To assess the effect of peer-identified change agents (PICAs) compared to management-selected change agents (MSCAs) on hand hygiene behavior in acute care.Design:Randomized-controlled study.Setting:Two internal medicine wards of a public, university-affiliated, tertiary-care hospital in Malaysia.Methods:We randomly allocated 2 wards to hand hygiene promotion delivered either by PICAs (study arm 1) or by MSCAs (study arm 2). The primary outcome was hand hygiene compliance using direct observation by validated auditors. Secondary outcomes were hand hygiene knowledge and observations from ward tours.Results:Mean hand hygiene compliance in study arm 1 and study arm 2 improved from 48% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44%–53%) and 50% (95% CI, 44%–55%) in the preintervention period to 66% (63%–69%) and 65% (60%–69%) in the intervention period, respectively. We detected no statistically significant difference in hand hygiene improvement between the 2 study arms. Knowledge scores on hand hygiene in study arm 1 and study arm 2 improved from 60% and 63% to 98% and 93%, respectively. Staff in study arm 1 improved hand hygiene because they did not want to disappoint the efforts taken by the PICAs. Staff in study arm 2 felt pressured by the MSCAs to comply with hand hygiene to obtain good overall performance appraisals.Conclusion:Although the attitude of PICAs and MSCAs in terms of leadership, mode of action and perception of their task by staff were very different, or even opposed, both PICAs and MSCAs effectively changed behavior of staff toward improved hand hygiene to comparable levels.

scholarly journals The Rise and Fall of i-STAT Point-of-Care Blood Gas Testing in an Acute Care Hospital

2000 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valerie L Ng ◽  
Roger Kraemer ◽  
Carol Hogan ◽  
Doug Eckman ◽  
Mark Siobal
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Blood Gas

scholarly journals 1186. Decreased Laboratory-Identified Clostridioides difficile Infections with Implementation of an Electronic Hand Hygiene Monitoring System in a Long-Term Acute Care Hospital Decreased Laboratory-Identified Clostridioides difficile Infections with Implementation of an Electronic Hand Hygiene Monitoring System in a Long-Term Acute Care Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S425-S425
Author(s):  
Maureen Banks ◽  
Andrew Phillips ◽  
Keith Chin ◽  
Lou Ann Bruno-Murtha
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Monitoring System ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Intervention Period ◽  
Environmental Cleaning ◽  
Clostridioides Difficile

Abstract Background Hand hygiene (HH) is the cornerstone of infection prevention and improved compliance has been associated with reduced healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). However, traditional methods for HH data collection have limitations and may not accurately reflect true compliance. We sought to evaluate whether an electronic hand hygiene monitoring system (HHMS) can improve data collection, compliance, and reduce HAIs. Methods A HHMS was implemented as part of a pilot at a single facility in June 2018 for all healthcare workers (HCWs) who entered patient rooms. The system prompted HCWs to perform HH with an audible and visual reminder emitted from a badge if a HH event had not been registered within specific timeframes of entering or exiting a patient room. The system captured compliance with preferential handwashing (soap and water) for at least 15 seconds upon exit of Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) designated rooms. All HH data were collected by the HHMS. Hand hygiene compliance and HAI data were compared for the pre-intervention (June 2017-May 2018) and intervention periods (July 2018-March 2019). No changes were made to environmental cleaning protocols or compliance monitoring, nor in antibiotic stewardship practices. Results HH compliance by direct observation in the pre-intervention period was 91% (1,612 observations). HH compliance with the HHMS during the intervention period was 97% (2,778,402 observations). The mean monthly HH opportunities recorded during the pre-intervention period was 134, while the HHMS captured 308,711, a greater than 2,300-fold increase. The incidence of healthcare facility-onset C. difficile infections (HO-CDI) pre-intervention was 9.60 per 10,000 patient-days (41 GDH+/Toxin+ laboratory-identified [labID] events/42,726 patient-days). With the HHMS, HO-CDI decreased 70% (P = 0.0003) to 2.89 per 10,000 patient-days (9 labID events/31,169 patient-days). No policy changes in environmental cleaning of high-touch surfaces were made or observed during the pilot. Conclusion The use of an HHMS facilitated more comprehensive HH data and improved compliance. The preliminary findings also support an association between more robust HH compliance data and a significant decrease in toxin-producing CDI. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Has Improved Hand Hygiene Compliance Reduced the Risk of Hospital-Acquired Infections among Hospitalized Patients in Ontario? Analysis of Publicly Reported Patient Safety Data from 2008 to 2011

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 605-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio DiDiodato
Keyword(s):  
Patient Safety ◽  
Hand Hygiene ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Poisson Regression ◽  
Hand Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Acute Care Hospitals ◽  
Ordinary Least Squares ◽  
Hospital Acquired Infections ◽  
Hygiene Compliance ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Design.Prospective, observational, ecological, time series, cross-sectional study examining the association between hand hygiene compliance (HHC) rates and the incidence of hospital-acquired infections.Setting.Acute care hospitals (N = 166) located in the province of Ontario, Canada.Methods.All data were extracted from the Ontario patient safety indicator database (http://www.hqontario.ca/public-reporting/patient-safety). Complete data were available for 166 acute care hospitals from October 1, 2008, to December 31, 2011. The rates of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) are reported monthly, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia quarterly, and HHC rates yearly. Trends and associations for each indicator were evaluated by ordinary least squares regression (HHC), zero-inflated Poisson regression (MRSA bacteremia), or Poisson regression (CDI). Dependent variables included in the regression analyses were extracted from the same database and included year, healthcare region, and type of hospital (teaching or small or large community).Results.Compared to those in 2008, reported HHC rates improved every year both before and after environment/patient contact (range, 10.6%–25.3%). Compared to those in 2008, there was no corresponding change in the rates of MRSA bacteremia; however, the rates of CDI decreased in 2009 but were not statistically significantly decreased from baseline in either 2010 or 2011. No consistent association was demonstrated between changes in the rates of HHC and these two healthcare-associated infections (HAIs).Conclusions.Despite significant improvements in reported rates of HHC among healthcare personnel in Ontario's hospitals, we could not demonstrate a positive ecological impact on rates of these two HAIs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document