Driving factors of nitrate leaching in arable organic cropping systems in Northern France

2019 ◽  
Vol 272 ◽  
pp. 38-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucia Rakotovololona ◽  
Nicolas Beaudoin ◽  
Aïcha Ronceux ◽  
Eric Venet ◽  
Bruno Mary
1995 ◽  
Vol 11 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 173-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. S. Østergaard ◽  
B. Stougaard ◽  
C. Jensen

Geoderma ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 342 ◽  
pp. 20-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bénédicte Autret ◽  
Nicolas Beaudoin ◽  
Lucia Rakotovololona ◽  
Michel Bertrand ◽  
Gilles Grandeau ◽  
...  

Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1571
Author(s):  
Nicolò Colombani ◽  
Micòl Mastrocicco ◽  
Fabio Vincenzi ◽  
Giuseppe Castaldelli

Nitrate is a major groundwater inorganic contaminant that is mainly due to fertilizer leaching. Compost amendment can increase soils’ organic substances and thus promote denitrification in intensively cultivated soils. In this study, two agricultural plots located in the Padana plain (Ferrara, Italy) were monitored and modeled for a period of 2.7 years. One plot was initially amended with 30 t/ha of compost, not tilled, and amended with standard fertilization practices, while the other one was run with standard fertilization and tillage practices. Monitoring was performed continuously via soil water probes (matric potential) and discontinuously via auger core profiles (major nitrogen species) before and after each cropping season. A HYDRUS-1D numerical model was calibrated and validated versus observed matric potential and nitrate, ammonium, and bromide (used as tracers). Model performance was judged satisfactory and the results provided insights on water and nitrogen balances for the two different agricultural practices tested here. While water balance and retention time in the vadose zone were similar in the two plots, nitrate leaching was less pronounced in the plot amended with compost due to a higher denitrification rate. This study provides clear evidence that compost addition and no-tillage (conservation agriculture) can diminish nitrate leaching to groundwater, with respect to standard agricultural practices.


2005 ◽  
Vol 111 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 292-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Beaudoin ◽  
J.K. Saad ◽  
C. Van Laethem ◽  
J.M. Machet ◽  
J. Maucorps ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 273 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 355-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Macdonald ◽  
P. R. Poulton ◽  
M. T. Howe ◽  
K. W. T. Goulding ◽  
D. S. Powlson

OCL ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 40
Author(s):  
Margot Leclère ◽  
Marie-Hélène Jeuffroy ◽  
Chantal Loyce

The development of local diversification value-chains requires the design and implementation of cropping systems adapted to a diversity of farms and the management of crops for which very little knowledge is available. In this article, using the example of camelina in northern France to supply a local oilseed biorefinery, we illustrate how (i) the realisation of a design workshop based on the formalization and sharing of local knowledge produced by a multi-stakeholder participatory approach, and (ii) the analysis, formalization and sharing of the outputs of this design workshop, are useful for supporting the introduction of a new species in a territory. In total, each of the nine farmers attending the workshop designed one (or two) proposal(s) to include and manage camelina adapted to their own situation. The precise description of these proposals and the explanation of the technical choices, the identification of the factors explaining the diversity of the proposals designed, as well as the inventory of the functions expected of the crop by the farmers, which are presented in this paper, constitute a set of elements that could also be used to support other farmers in the area who would like to introduce this new species into their cropping system.


2012 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 57-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessia Perego ◽  
Angelo Basile ◽  
Antonello Bonfante ◽  
Roberto De Mascellis ◽  
Fabio Terribile ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document