Effects of a stand-alone web-based electronic screening and brief intervention targeting alcohol use in university students of legal drinking age: A randomized controlled trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 77 ◽  
pp. 81-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Ganz ◽  
Michael Braun ◽  
Marion Laging ◽  
Karin Schermelleh-Engel ◽  
Johannes Michalak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Alcohol Use ◽  
University Students ◽  
Brief Intervention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Screening And Brief Intervention ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Electronic Screening ◽  
Drinking Age

Electronic screening and brief intervention for risky drinking in Swedish university students — A randomized controlled trial

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 654-659 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Stark Ekman ◽  
Agneta Andersson ◽  
Per Nilsen ◽  
Henriettae Ståhlbrandt ◽  
Anne Lie Johansson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
University Students ◽  
Brief Intervention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Risky Drinking ◽  
Screening And Brief Intervention ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Electronic Screening

scholarly journals Web-based screening and brief intervention for hazardous drinking: a double-blind randomized controlled trial

Addiction ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 99 (11) ◽  
pp. 1410-1417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kypros Kypri ◽  
John B. Saunders ◽  
Sheila M. Williams ◽  
Rob O. McGee ◽  
John D. Langley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Brief Intervention ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Hazardous Drinking ◽  
Screening And Brief Intervention ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals An Electronic Screening and Brief Intervention for Hazardous and Harmful Drinking Among Swedish University Students: Reanalysis of Findings From a Randomized Controlled Trial Using a Bayesian Framework

10.2196/14420 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. e14420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcus Bendtsen
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
University Students ◽  
Null Hypothesis ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Bayesian Framework ◽  
Screening And Brief Intervention ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Electronic Screening

Background Due to a resurgent debate on the misuse of P values, the Journal of Medical Internet Research is hosting a standing theme issue inviting the reanalysis of (primarily digital health) trial data using a Bayesian framework. This first paper in this series focuses on an electronic screening and brief intervention (eSBI), targeting harmful and hazardous alcohol consumption, which student health care centers across Sweden have routinely administerd to all students during the past decade. The second Alcohol Email Assessment and Feedback Study Dismantling Effectiveness for University Students (AMADEUS-2) trial aimed to assess the effect of the eSBI on alcohol consumption among students who were harmful and hazardous drinkers. A two-arm randomized controlled trial design was employed, randomizing eligible participants to either a waiting list or direct access to an eSBI. Follow-up assessments were conducted 2 months after randomization. Subsequent analysis of the trial followed the conventional null hypothesis approach, and no statistical significance was found between groups at follow-up with respect to the number of standard drinks consumed weekly. However, in an unspecified sensitivity analysis, it was discovered that removing three potential outliers made the difference between the groups significant. Objective The objective of this study is to reperform the primary and sensitivity analysis of the AMADEUS-2 trial using a Bayesian framework and to compare the results with those of the original analysis. Methods The same regression models used in the original analysis were employed in this reanalysis (negative binomial regression). Model parameters were given uniform priors. Markov chain Monte Carlo was used for Bayesian inference, and posterior probabilities were calculated for prespecified thresholds of interest. Results Null hypothesis tests did not identify a statistically significant difference between the intervention and control groups, potentially due to a few extreme data points. The Bayesian analysis indicated a 93.6% probability that there was a difference in grams of alcohol consumed at follow-up between the intervention and control groups and a 71.5% probability that the incidence rate ratio was <0.96. Posterior probabilities increased when excluding three potential outliers, yet such post hoc analyses were not necessary to show the preference toward offering an eSBI to harmful and hazardous drinkers among university students. Conclusions The null hypothesis framework relies on point estimates of parameters. P values can therefore swing heavily, depending on a single or few data points alone, casting doubt on the value of the analysis. Bayesian analysis results in a distribution over parameter values and is therefore less sensitive to outliers and extreme values. Results from analyses of trials of interventions where small-to-modest effect sizes are expected can be more robust in a Bayesian framework, making this a potentially better approach for analyzing digital health research data. Trial Registration International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number (ISRCTN) 02335307; http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN02335307

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document