Minimizing sleep deprivation effects in healthy adults by differential outcomes

2012 ◽  
Vol 139 (3) ◽  
pp. 391-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Martella ◽  
Victoria Plaza ◽  
Angeles F. Estévez ◽  
Alejandro Castillo ◽  
Luis J. Fuentes
2011 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. S14
Author(s):  
Nanette S. Danielsson ◽  
Shane MacDonald ◽  
Markus Jansson-Fröjmark ◽  
Steven J. Linton ◽  
Allison G. Harvey

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 975-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Göksel Açar ◽  
Mustafa Akçakoyun ◽  
Ibrahim Sari ◽  
Mustafa Bulut ◽  
Elnur Alizade ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. P4993-P4993
Author(s):  
M. Sunbul ◽  
B. Kanar ◽  
T. Kivrak ◽  
E. Durmus ◽  
I. Sari ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. e0116906 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ursula M. H. Klumpers ◽  
Dick J. Veltman ◽  
Marie-Jose van Tol ◽  
Reina W. Kloet ◽  
Ronald Boellaard ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Chantelle A. Nielson ◽  
Emily G. Deegan ◽  
Aaron S.L. Hung ◽  
Abraham J Nunes

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of sleep deprivation and rest on postural control. It was hypothesized that significant increases in COP deviations will occur after sleep deprivation. Methods. Four healthy adults (age= 21.50 years; mass= 68.93 kg) participated in two protocols involving sleep and sleep-deprivation. Within each condition multiple 40s impairments of visual, somatosensory, and/or vestibular sensory feedback were performed. Balance was quantified using root-mean-square (RMS) of the centre of pressure (COP) and COP Variance. Results. Two-way ANOVA demonstrated no significant effect of sleep deprivation on balance between sensory insults. Paired t-tests were performed nonetheless and revealed significant differences within the sleep-deprived condition. COP RMS and Variance were significantly greater medio-laterally with all systems impaired (ALL) (3.43 ± 0.63 mm, p


2014 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
pp. 1430-1434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared Minkel ◽  
Marisa Moreta ◽  
Julianne Muto ◽  
Oo Htaik ◽  
Christopher Jones ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ellen T. Kahn-Greene ◽  
Desiree B. Killgore ◽  
Gary H. Kamimori ◽  
Thomas J. Balkin ◽  
William D.S. Killgore

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-137
Author(s):  
Anshul Arora ◽  
Jayashree S. Bhat ◽  
Deepak Raj ◽  
Ajit Kumar ◽  
Kaushlendra Kumar

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A17-A17
Author(s):  
J Boardman ◽  
M Bravo ◽  
T Andrillon ◽  
C Anderson ◽  
S Drummond

Abstract Introduction The ability to detect and subsequently correct errors is important in preventing the detrimental consequences of sleep loss. We report the first study to compare the effects of total sleep deprivation (TSD) and sleep restriction (SR) on error awareness. Methods Thirteen healthy adults (11F, age=26.8±3.4y) underwent a 34h TSD protocol, completing the Error Awareness Task (EAT: a combined Stroop/1-back/GoNogo task) at 4h and 27h post-wake. Twenty healthy adults (11F, age=27.4±5.3y) were studied both well-rested (WR: 9h sleep) and following SR (3 nights of 3h sleep), completing the EAT once/day (8-9h post-habitual wake). The EAT required participants to withhold responding to “nogo” stimuli and signal, via a button press, whenever they realised they made an error on these nogo trials. Results TSD did not significantly affect error rate (p=.712) or error awareness rate (p=.517), however, participants were slower to recognise errors after TSD (p=.004). In contrast, SR increased error rate (p<.001), decreased error awareness (p<.001), and slowed recognition of errors (p<.01). Discussion Three nights SR impaired the ability to recognise errors in real-time, despite a greater number of errors being made. Thus, impaired error awareness may be one mechanism underlying increased sleep loss-related accidents and errors in occupational settings, as well as at home. Interestingly, 1-night TSD did not lead to more, or impaired recognition of errors. TSD participants were slower to recognise errors, which may be problematic in safety critical settings. Technological and/or operational solutions may be needed to reduce the risk of errors going unrecognised.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document