Enhanced change detection performance reveals improved strategy use in avid action video game players

Kait Clark; Mathias S. Fleck; Stephen R. Mitroff

doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.10.003

Enhanced change detection performance reveals improved strategy use in avid action video game players

Acta Psychologica ◽

10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.10.003 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 136 (1) ◽

pp. 67-72 ◽

Cited By ~ 67

Author(s):

Kait Clark ◽

Mathias S. Fleck ◽

Stephen R. Mitroff

Keyword(s):

Change Detection ◽

Video Game ◽

Detection Performance ◽

Strategy Use ◽

Action Video Game ◽

Game Players ◽

Change Detection Performance

Download Full-text

Enhancing Conventional SAR Change Detection Performance with Apodization

IGARSS 2020 - 2020 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium ◽

10.1109/igarss39084.2020.9323427 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Viet T. Vu ◽

Mats I. Pettersson ◽

Thomas K. Sjogren

Keyword(s):

Change Detection ◽

Detection Performance ◽

Change Detection Performance

Download Full-text

Flightpath Tracking, Change Detection and Visual Scanning in an Integrated Hazard Display

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting ◽

10.1177/154193120504900116 ◽

2005 ◽

Vol 49 (1) ◽

pp. 68-72 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Amy L. Alexander ◽

Christopher D. Wickens

Keyword(s):

Response Time ◽

Change Detection ◽

Detection Performance ◽

Vertical Dimension ◽

Visual Scanning ◽

Flight Instructors ◽

Detection Response ◽

Step Down ◽

Integrated Hazard ◽

Change Detection Performance

Twenty-four certified flight instructors were required to fly a series of curved, step-down approaches while detecting changes to surrounding traffic aircraft and weather cell icons on two integrated hazard display (IHD) formats (2D coplanar and split-screen) under varying workload levels. Generally, it appears that the 2D coplanar IHD was better in supporting flightpath tracking and change detection performance when compared to a split-screen display. Pilots exhibited superior flightpath tracking (in the vertical dimension, and under low workload) when using the 2D coplanar IHD, although this effect was mitigated by increasing workload such that tracking deteriorated faster with the 2D coplanar than the split-screen display. The spawned 3D cost of diminished size with distance from ownship played a role in change detection response time—pilots were slower (particularly in detecting traffic aircraft changes) with the split-screen compared to the 2D coplanar IHD. These effects will be discussed within the context of visual scanning measures.

Download Full-text