scholarly journals Evaluation of Soxhlet extraction, accelerated solvent extraction and microwave-assisted extraction for the determination of polychlorinated biphenyls and polybrominated diphenyl ethers in soil and fish samples

2010 ◽  
Vol 663 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pu Wang ◽  
Qinghua Zhang ◽  
Yawei Wang ◽  
Thanh Wang ◽  
Xiaomin Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solvent Extraction ◽  
Polychlorinated Biphenyls ◽  
Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers ◽  
Soxhlet Extraction ◽  
Microwave Assisted Extraction ◽  
Microwave Assisted ◽  
Assisted Extraction ◽  
Fish Samples ◽  
Diphenyl Ethers

Optimization and validation of two-step method for determination of polybrominated diphenyl ethers in Croatian house dust samples

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karla Jagić ◽  
Marija Dvoršćak ◽  
Andreja Jurič ◽  
Toni Safner ◽  
Darija Klinčić
Keyword(s):  
House Dust ◽  
Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers ◽  
Diphenyl Ether ◽  
Polybrominated Diphenyl Ether ◽  
Microwave Assisted Extraction ◽  
Step Method ◽  
Microwave Assisted ◽  
Assisted Extraction ◽  
Diphenyl Ethers

Microwave-assisted extraction was applied as method for extraction of seven polybrominated diphenyl ether (PBDE) congeners (28, 47, 99, 100, 153, 154, and 183) from house dust samples. Optimization of MAE...

scholarly journals Evaluation of Microwave-Assisted Extraction for the Analysis of Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Organochlorine Pesticides in Fish

2008 ◽  
Vol 91 (5) ◽  
pp. 1124-1129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takamitsu Otake ◽  
Yoshie Aoyagi ◽  
Masahiko Numata ◽  
Takashi Yarita
Keyword(s):  
Polychlorinated Biphenyls ◽  
Organochlorine Pesticides ◽  
Soxhlet Extraction ◽  
Liquid Extraction ◽  
Isotope Dilution Method ◽  
Dilution Method ◽  
Microwave Assisted Extraction ◽  
Extraction Techniques ◽  
Microwave Assisted ◽  
Assisted Extraction

Abstract The efficiency of microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) was evaluated for the analysis of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) in fish. An isotope dilution method was used for quantification via analysis of the samples by gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. MAE solvent, temperature, and time were optimized, and observed concentrations were compared. The MAE results were also compared to those of other extraction techniques (Soxhlet extraction, pressurized liquid extraction, saponification, and homogenization). Concentrations of PCBs and OCPs obtained by MAE at 120C for 10 min were comparable to those by the other techniques. The results suggest that MAE can be used for the analysis of PCBs and OCPs in fish.

scholarly journals Microwave-Assisted Extraction and Accelerated Solvent Extraction with Ethyl Acetate–Cyclohexane before Determination of Organochlorines in Fish Tissue by Gas Chromatography with Electron-Capture Detection

2000 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. 1334-1344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion Weichbrodt ◽  
Walter Vetter ◽  
Bernd Luckas
Keyword(s):  
Solvent Extraction ◽  
Fish Tissue ◽  
Solvent Mixture ◽  
Organochlorine Compounds ◽  
Water Removal ◽  
Microwave Assisted Extraction ◽  
Microwave Assisted ◽  
Assisted Extraction ◽  
Quantitative Extraction

Abstract Focused open-vessel microwave-assisted extraction (FOV–MAE), closed-vessel microwave-assisted extraction (CV–MAE), and accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) were used for extraction before determination of organochlorine compounds (polychlorinated biphenyls, DDT, toxaphene, chlordane, hexachlorobenzene, hexachlorocyclohexanes, and dieldrin) in cod liver and fish fillets. Wet samples were extracted without the time-consuming step of lyophilization or other sample-drying procedures. Extractions were performed with the solvent mixture ethyl acetate–cyclohexane (1 + 1, v/v), which allowed direct use of gel-permeation chromatography without solvent exchange. For FOV–MAE, the solvent mixture removed water from the sample matrix via azeotropic distillation. The status of water removal was controlled during extraction by measuring the temperature of the distillate. After water removal, the temperature of the distillate increased and the solvent mixture became less polar. Only the pure extraction solvent allowed quantitative extraction of the organochlorine compounds. For CV–MAE, water could not be separated during the extraction. For this reason, the extraction procedure for wet fish tissue required 2 extraction steps: the first for manual removal of coextracted water, and the second for quantitative extraction of the organochlorine compounds with the pure solvent. Therefore, CV–MAE is less convenient for samples with high water content. For ASE, water in the sample was bound with Na2SO4. The reproducibility for each technique was very good (relative standard deviation was typically <10%); the slightly varying levels were attributed to deviations during sample cleanup and the generally low levels.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document