Microbial flow cytometry: An ideal tool for prospective antimicrobial drug development

2016 ◽  
Vol 509 ◽  
pp. 89-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pushpanathan Muthirulan ◽  
Arun Richard Chandrasekaran
Author(s):  
Padma Narayanan ◽  
Renold J. Capocasale ◽  
Nianyu Li ◽  
Peter J. Bugelski

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (S1) ◽  
pp. 50-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory W. Daniel ◽  
Monika Schneider ◽  
Marianne Hamilton Lopez ◽  
Mark B. McClellan

As part of a multifactorial approach to address weak incentives for innovative antimicrobial drug development, market entry rewards (MERs) are an emerging solution. Recently, the Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy released the Priority Antimicrobial Value and Entry (PAVE) Award proposal, which combines a MER with payment reforms, transitioning from volume-based to “value-based” payments for antimicrobials. Here, the PAVE Award and similar MERs are reviewed, focusing on further refinement and avenues for implementation.


Bioanalysis ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vellalore N Kakkanaiah ◽  
Katie Matys ◽  
Patrick Bennett

Flow cytometer is a powerful cellular analysis tool consists of three main components; fluidics, optics and electronics. Flow cytometry methods have been used in all stages of drug development as like ligand binding assays (LBA). Both LBA and flow cytometry methods require specific interaction between the critical reagents and the analytes. Antibodies and their conjugates, viable dyes and permeabilizing buffer are the main critical reagents in flow cytometry methods. Similarly, antibodies, engineered proteins and their conjugates are the main critical reagents in LBA. The main difference between the two methods is the lack of true reference standards for flow cytometry cellular analysis.


2004 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 1279-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Spellberg ◽  
J. H. Powers ◽  
E. P. Brass ◽  
L. G. Miller ◽  
J. E. Edwards

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document