Kinetic Isotope Effect Analysis of RNA 2′- O -Transphosphorylation

2017 ◽  
pp. 433-457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael E. Harris ◽  
Darrin M. York ◽  
Joseph A. Piccirilli ◽  
Vernon E. Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Isotope Effect ◽  
Kinetic Isotope Effect ◽  
Effect Analysis ◽  
Kinetic Isotope

Quantum electrocatalysts: theoretical picture, electrochemical kinetic isotope effect analysis, and conjecture to understand microscopic mechanisms

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (20) ◽  
pp. 11219-11243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken Sakaushi
Keyword(s):  
Isotope Effect ◽  
Kinetic Isotope Effect ◽  
Effect Analysis ◽  
Kinetic Isotope

The fundamental aspects of quantum electrocatalysts are discussed together with the newly developed electrochemical kinetic isotope effect (EC-KIE) approach.

Kinetic isotope effect analysis of the reaction catalyzed by Trypanosoma congolense trypanothione reductase

Biochemistry ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 31 (28) ◽  
pp. 6414-6420 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betty N. Leichus ◽  
Mark Bradley ◽  
Kari Nadeau ◽  
Christopher T. Walsh ◽  
John S. Blanchard
Keyword(s):  
Isotope Effect ◽  
Kinetic Isotope Effect ◽  
Trypanosoma Congolense ◽  
Trypanothione Reductase ◽  
Effect Analysis ◽  
Kinetic Isotope

Kinetic Isotope Effect Analysis of the Ribosomal Peptidyl Transferase Reaction†

Biochemistry ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 4018-4027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy C. Seila ◽  
Kensuke Okuda ◽  
Sara Núñez ◽  
Andrew F. Seila ◽  
Scott A. Strobel
Keyword(s):  
Isotope Effect ◽  
Kinetic Isotope Effect ◽  
Peptidyl Transferase ◽  
Effect Analysis ◽  
Kinetic Isotope

scholarly journals l-mandelate dehydrogenase from Rhodotorula graminis: comparisons with the l-lactate dehydrogenase (flavocytochrome b2) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae

1993 ◽  
Vol 290 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
O Smékal ◽  
M Yasin ◽  
C A Fewson ◽  
G A Reid ◽  
S K Chapman
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Lactate Dehydrogenase ◽  
Isotope Effect ◽  
Kinetic Isotope Effect ◽  
Dimensional Structure ◽  
Striking Difference ◽  
Kinetic Properties ◽  
Proton Abstraction ◽  
Rate Determining Step ◽  
Kinetic Isotope

L-Lactate dehydrogenase (L-LDH) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and L-mandelate dehydrogenase (L-MDH) from Rhodotorula graminis are both flavocytochromes b2. The kinetic properties of these enzymes have been compared using steady-state kinetic methods. The most striking difference between the two enzymes is found by comparing their substrate specificities. L-LDH and L-MDH have mutually exclusive primary substrates, i.e. the substrate for one enzyme is a potent competitive inhibitor for the other. Molecular-modelling studies on the known three-dimensional structure of S. cerevisiae L-LDH suggest that this enzyme is unable to catalyse the oxidation of L-mandelate because productive binding is impeded by steric interference, particularly between the side chain of Leu-230 and the phenyl ring of mandelate. Another major difference between L-LDH and L-MDH lies in the rate-determining step. For S. cerevisiae L-LDH, the major rate-determining step is proton abstraction at C-2 of lactate, as previously shown by the 2H kinetic-isotope effect. However, in R. graminis L-MDH the kinetic-isotope effect seen with DL-[2-2H]mandelate is only 1.1 +/- 0.1, clearly showing that proton abstraction at C-2 of mandelate is not rate-limiting. The fact that the rate-determining step is different indicates that the transition states in each of these enzymes must also be different.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document