scholarly journals Impalpable breast lesion localisation, a logistical challenge: results of the UK iBRA-NET national practice questionnaire

Author(s):  
Santosh K. Somasundaram ◽  
Shelley Potter ◽  
Suzanne Elgammal ◽  
Anthony J. Maxwell ◽  
Amtul S. Sami ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (6) ◽  
pp. e5
Author(s):  
Santosh Somasundaram ◽  
Shelley Potter ◽  
Suzanne Elgammal ◽  
Anthony Maxwell ◽  
Amtul Sami ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Basu ◽  
C Georgalas ◽  
P Sen ◽  
A K Bhattacharyya

Background: Patients are traditionally advised to refrain from exposing their ears to water after most otological procedures. However, recent evidence suggests that water does not adversely affect the outcome for children with tympanostomy tubes. The evidence behind the potential harmful effects of water on the outcome of other otological procedures is scarce.Objective: The study was done to determine the current practice of otolaryngology consultants in the UK on the advice given to patients regarding swimming, diving and bathing in soapy water after myringotomy and tympanostomy tube insertion, mastoidectomy and myringoplasty.Method: Questionnaire based survey mailed to 382 members (consultants only) of the British Association of Otolaryngologists – Head & Neck Surgeons in the UK.Results: A total of 195 responses were received (reply rate 51 per cent). In all, 95.6 per cent of the respondents allowed their patients to swim after insertion of tympanostomy tubes, with 32.9 per cent insisting on the use of earplugs until extrusion of the tympanostomy tubes. However, 61.6 per cent of the respondents restricted diving in these patients. In comparison, the respondents were more conservative with water precautions following myringoplasty and mastoidectomy. More than half the respondents recommended earplugs for bathing after all three operations.Conclusion: This study reveals current national practice among UK otolaryngologists. There is no general consensus in post-operative advice following otolaryngological procedures, indicating a need for national guidelines.


2010 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Hussain ◽  
A Gordon-Dixon ◽  
H Almusawy ◽  
P Sinha ◽  
A Desai

INTRODUCTION In the UK, the majority of breast cancers are diagnosed through symptomatic breast clinics and the breast screening programmes. With increased use of computed tomography (CT) to assess various pathologies, breast lesions are picked up incidentally. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence and outcomes of breast lesions detected incidentally on CT scans. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective study was conducted to assess the incidence and outcome of incidentally found breast lesions, which were detected on chest CT scans that were conducted for other pathologies during the period from February 2007 to October 2008. RESULTS A total of 432 chest CT scans were performed over 18 months. Thirty-three (7.63%) patients were found to have an incidental breast lesion. The mean age was 73 years (range, 50–86 years). Of these, 17 (52%) were benign, eight (24%) were primary breast cancer and the remaining eight (24%) had no definite pathology. The detection rate of breast cancer was 1.85%. CONCLUSIONS CT is emerging as an important contributor to the detection of occult breast lesions. Radiological awareness of incidental breast lesions is important so that appropriate referral to a specialised breast unit is made.


2005 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Riccardo A Audisio ◽  
Rana Nadeem ◽  
Olga Harris ◽  
Sean Desmond ◽  
Rani Thind ◽  
...  

The Breast ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 35 ◽  
pp. 182-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Senthurun Mylvaganam ◽  
Elizabeth Conroy ◽  
Paula R. Williamson ◽  
Nicola L.P. Barnes ◽  
Ramsey I. Cutress ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (7) ◽  
pp. 624-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Robinson ◽  
L Ward ◽  
H Mehanna ◽  
V Paleri ◽  
S C Winter

AbstractBackgroundNeck dissection is associated with post-operative shoulder dysfunction in a substantial number of patients, affecting quality of life and return to work. There is no current UK national practice regarding physiotherapy after neck dissection.MethodNine regional centres were surveyed to determine their standard physiotherapy practice pre- and post-neck dissection, and to determine pre-emptive physiotherapy for any patients.ResultsEighty-nine per cent of centres never arranged any pre-emptive physiotherapy for any patients. Thirty-three per cent of centres offered routine in-patient physiotherapy after surgery. No centres offered out-patient physiotherapy for all patients regardless of symptoms. Seventy-eight per cent offered physiotherapy for patients with any symptoms, with 11 per cent offering physiotherapy for those with severe dysfunction only. Eleven per cent of centres never offered physiotherapy for any dysfunction.ConclusionThe provision of physiotherapy is most commonly reactive rather than proactive, and usually driven by patient request. There is little evidence of pre-arranged physiotherapy for patients to treat or prevent shoulder dysfunction in the UK.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document