scholarly journals Gap Duration Discrimination in Listeners with Cochlear Hearing Loss: Effects of Gap and Marker Duration, Frequency Separation, and Mode of Presentation

2001 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 388-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Grose ◽  
Joseph W. Hall III ◽  
Emily Buss
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Duration Discrimination ◽  
Frequency Separation ◽  
Mode Of Presentation ◽  
Cochlear Hearing Loss

Monaural Envelope Correlation Perception in Listeners With Normal Hearing and Cochlear Impairment

1993 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1306-1314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph W. Hall ◽  
John H. Grose
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Hearing Impairment ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Frequency Separation ◽  
Choice Procedure ◽  
Cochlear Hearing Loss ◽  
Improved Performance ◽  
Band Number ◽  
Envelope Correlation

Monaural envelope correlation perception was investigated in listeners with normal hearing and in listeners with cochlear hearing loss. Using a three-interval forced-choice procedure, the task of the subject was to identify the one interval out of three where the noise bands had correlated envelopes. Performance was determined as a function of the spectral separation between noise bands (Δf of 250, 500, or 1000 Hz) and the number of noise bands present (two, three, or five). Although individual differences existed, the results generally indicated better performance for the listeners with normal hearing when the Δf between bands was relatively small; however, there was no significant effect of hearing loss when the frequency separation between bands was greater than 250 Hz. The listeners with normal hearing generally showed decreased performance with increasing Δf, whereas the performance of many of the listeners with hearing impairment usually did not change appreciably with variation in Δf. Both groups of listeners showed improved performance with increasing number of noise bands present for the 500-Hz Δf. Only the listeners with hearing impairment showed significantly improved performance with increasing band number for the 250-Hz Δf; neither group showed improved performance with increasing band number for the 1000-Hz Δf. With five bands present, the performance of the listeners with hearing impairment did not differ significantly from that of the listeners with normal hearing, even for the 250-Hz Δf. It is possible that the poor performance of many of the listeners with hearing impairment when Δf is small may be due to relatively poor peripheral frequency analysis. It is difficult to determine the role of within-channel versus across-channel cues in the effects obtained.

Duration Discrimination in Listeners With Cochlear Hearing Loss

2004 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Grose ◽  
Joseph W. Hall ◽  
Emily Buss
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Stimulus Change ◽  
Duration Discrimination ◽  
Center Frequency ◽  
Hearing Sensitivity ◽  
Cochlear Hearing Loss ◽  
Pure Tones ◽  
Tonal Stimuli ◽  
Temporal Judgments ◽  
Narrow Bands

This study examined the effects of cochlear hearing loss on the ability to discriminate increments in the duration of a stimulus under conditions where the frequency and/or amplitude of the stimulus change dynamically. Three stimulus types were used: pure tones, frequency-modulated tones, and narrow bands of noise. The carrier/center frequency of each 250-ms stimulus either remained constant at 1035 Hz or varied randomly from presentation to presentation across the frequency range 432–2804 Hz. Two groups of listeners participated: 9 with bilateral cochlear hearing loss and 7 with normal hearing sensitivity. The results showed no differences in performance between the 2 groups. However, both groups showed poorer duration discrimination for the conditions where the carrier/center frequency changed randomly than for the conditions where the carrier/center frequency remained constant. In addition, performance was poorer for the narrowband noise stimuli than for the tonal stimuli. This pattern of results suggests that across-frequency temporal judgments are more difficult than isofrequency temporal judgments, but that cochlear hearing loss does not exacerbate this difficulty per se.

Perceptual Organization of Sequential Stimuli in Listeners With Cochlear Hearing Loss

1996 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 1149-1158 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. Grose ◽  
J. W. Hall
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Perceptual Organization ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Recognition Task ◽  
Normal Hearing ◽  
Frequency Separation ◽  
Sequential Processing ◽  
Melody Recognition ◽  
Cochlear Hearing Loss ◽  
Two Measures

The perceptual organization of sequential stimuli presumably depends in part on the fidelity with which acoustic cues are encoded in the auditory system. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of cochlear hearing loss on two measures of sequential processing that rely on spectro-temporal information. The results of a gap detection/discrimination task indicated that listeners with cochlear hearing loss exhibited particular difficulty discriminating gaps between tonal markers that were disparate in frequency. Performance improved when the disparate tones were embedded into a sequence of alternating low- and high-frequency tones that may have facilitated the perceptual parsing of the stimuli into separate auditory streams. However, performance for listeners with cochlear hearing loss was generally poorer than that of normal-hearing listeners and did not appear to be related to threshold in quiet or to frequency selectivity. The results of a melody recognition task that required a target melody to be "heard out" from simultaneous competing melodies also indicated generally poorer performance on the part of the listeners with hearing loss, although the pattern of results across all listeners was highly idiosyncratic. It was concluded that cochlear hearing loss deleteriously affects the processes underlying perceptual organization of sequential stimuli. In particular, perceptual organization in the presence of cochlear hearing loss appears to require a greater frequency separation between presumed auditory streams in comparison to normal-hearing listeners.

Age Effects on Measures of Auditory Duration Discrimination

1994 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 662-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Fitzgibbons ◽  
Sandra Gordon-Salant
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Stimulus Frequency ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Duration Discrimination ◽  
Elderly Subjects ◽  
Hearing Sensitivity ◽  
Choice Procedure ◽  
Forced Choice Procedure ◽  
Tonal Stimuli ◽  
Young And Elderly Subjects

This study examined auditory temporal sensitivity in young adult and elderly listeners using psychophysical tasks that measured duration discrimination. Listeners in the experiments were divided into groups of young and elderly subjects with normal hearing sensitivity and with mild-to-moderate sloping sensorineural hearing loss. Temporal thresholds in all tasks were measured with an adaptive forced-choice procedure using tonal stimuli centered at 500 Hz and 4000 Hz. Difference limens for duration were measured for tone bursts (250 msec reference duration) and for silent intervals between tone bursts (250 msec and 6.4 msec reference durations). Results showed that the elderly listeners exhibited diminished duration discrimination for both tones and silent intervals when the reference duration was 250 msec. Hearing loss did not affect these results. Discrimination of the brief temporal gap (6.4 msec) was influenced by age and hearing loss, but these effects were not consistent across all listeners. Effects of stimulus frequency were not evident for most of the duration discrimination conditions.

Further evaluation of a model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss

1999 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 898-907 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian C. J. Moore ◽  
Brian R. Glasberg ◽  
Deborah A. Vickers
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Cochlear Hearing Loss

scholarly journals Evidence for a dynorphin-mediated inner ear immune/inflammatory response and glutamate-induced neural excitotoxicity: an updated analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 122 (4) ◽  
pp. 1421-1460
Author(s):  
Tony L. Sahley ◽  
David J. Anderson ◽  
Michael D. Hammonds ◽  
Karthik Chandu ◽  
Frank E. Musiek
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Brain Stem ◽  
Inner Ear ◽  
Hair Cells ◽  
Oxidative Stress Response ◽  
Neural Systems ◽  
Type I ◽  
Excitatory Neurotransmitter ◽  
Axon Terminals ◽  
Cochlear Hearing Loss

Acoustic overstimulation (AOS) is defined as the stressful overexposure to high-intensity sounds. AOS is a precipitating factor that leads to a glutamate (GLU)-induced Type I auditory neural excitotoxicity and an activation of an immune/inflammatory/oxidative stress response within the inner ear, often resulting in cochlear hearing loss. The dendrites of the Type I auditory neural neurons that innervate the inner hair cells (IHCs), and respond to the IHC release of the excitatory neurotransmitter GLU, are themselves directly innervated by the dynorphin (DYN)-bearing axon terminals of the descending brain stem lateral olivocochlear (LOC) system. DYNs are known to increase GLU availability, potentiate GLU excitotoxicity, and induce superoxide production. DYNs also increase the production of proinflammatory cytokines by modulating immune/inflammatory signal transduction pathways. Evidence is provided supporting the possibility that the GLU-mediated Type I auditory neural dendritic swelling, inflammation, excitotoxicity, and cochlear hearing loss that follow AOS may be part of a brain stem-activated, DYN-mediated cascade of inflammatory events subsequent to a LOC release of DYNs into the cochlea. In support of a DYN-mediated cascade of events are established investigations linking DYNs to the immune/inflammatory/excitotoxic response in other neural systems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document