Development of gingivitis around aged restorations of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and resin composite

Abstract Introduction The aim of the current study was to evaluate shear bond strength of resin composite bonded to Theracal LC, Biodentine, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) using universal adhesive and mode of fracture. Materials and Methods A total of 50 caries-free maxillary and mandibular molars extracted were taken; occlusal cavities were prepared, mounted in acrylic blocks, and divided into five groups based on the liner used. Group 1: Biodentine liner placed into the cavity and bonding agent and resin composite applied after 12 minutes. Group 2: Biodentine liner placed into the cavity and bonding agent and resin composite applied after 14 days. Group 3: RMGIC liner placed into the cavity and bonding agent and resin composite applied immediately. Group 4: RMGIC liner placed into the cavity and bonding agent and resin composite applied after 7 days. Group 5: Theracal LC liner placed into the cavity and bonding agent and resin composite applied immediately. Each sample was bonded to resin composite using universal adhesive. Shear bond strength analysis was performed at a cross-head speed of 0.1 mm/min. Statistical Analysis Statistical analysis was performed with one-way analysis of variance and posthoc Bonferroni test using SPSS version 22.0. Results and Conclusion Biodentine liner when bonded immediately to resin composite showed minimum shear bond strength. RMGIC when bonded to resin composite after 7 days showed maximum shear bond strength. Mode of fracture was predominantly cohesive in groups having Biodentine and Theracal LC as liner.

Download Full-text

The Effect of Resin-modified Glass-ionomer Cement Base and Bulk-fill Resin Composite on Cuspal Deformation

Operative Dentistry ◽

10.2341/14-331-l ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 41 (2) ◽

pp. 208-218 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

KV Nguyen ◽

RH Wong ◽

J Palamara ◽

MF Burrow

Keyword(s):

Resin Composite ◽

Glass Ionomer Cement ◽

High Viscosity ◽

Glass Ionomer ◽

Base Materials ◽

Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽

Maxillary Premolars ◽

Materials Used ◽

Ionomer Cement ◽

Adhesive Materials

SUMMARY Objectives: This study investigated cuspal deformation in teeth restored with different types of adhesive materials with and without a base. Methods: Mesio-occluso-distal slot cavities of moderately large dimension were prepared on extracted maxillary premolars (n=24). Teeth were assigned to one of four groups and restored with either a sonic-activated bulk-fill resin composite (RC) (SonicFill), or a conventional nanohybrid RC (Herculite Ultra). The base materials used were a flowable nanofilled RC (Premise Flowable) and a high-viscosity resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC) (Riva Light-Cure HV). Cuspal deflection was measured with two direct current differential transformers, each contacting a buccal and palatal cusp. Cuspal movements were recorded during and after restoration placement. Data for the buccal and palatal cusp deflections were combined to give the net cuspal deflection. Results: Data varied widely. All teeth experienced net inward cuspal movement. No statistically significant differences in cuspal deflection were found among the four test groups. Conclusions: The use of a flowable RC or an RMGIC in closed-laminate restorations produced the same degree of cuspal movement as restorations filled with only a conventional nanohybrid or bulk-fill RC.

Download Full-text

Fluoride release profile of a nanofilled resin-modified glass ionomer cement

Brazilian Dental Journal ◽

10.1590/s0103-64402011000400002 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 22 (4) ◽

pp. 275-279 ◽

Cited By ~ 25

Author(s):

Marco Aurélio Benini Paschoal ◽

Carla Vecchione Gurgel ◽

Daniela Rios ◽

Ana Carolina Magalhães ◽

Marília Afonso Rabelo Buzalaf ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Resin Composite ◽

Linear Regression Analysis ◽

Glass Ionomer Cement ◽

Strong Relationship ◽

Release Profile ◽

Dental Practice ◽

Fluoride Release ◽

Glass Ionomer ◽

Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽

Ionomer Cement

The present study aimed to compare the fluoride (F-) release pattern of a nanofilled resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC) (Ketac N100 - KN) with available GICs used in dental practice (resin-modified GIC - Vitremer - V; conventional GIC - Ketac Molar - KM) and a nanofilled resin composite (Filtek Supreme - RC). Discs of each material (n=6) were placed into 4 mL of deionized water in sealed polyethylene vials and shaken, for 15 days. F- release (μg F-/cm²) was measured each day using a fluoride-ion specific electrode. Cumulative F- release means were statistically analyzed by linear regression analysis. In order to analyze the differences among materials and the influence of time in the daily F- release, 2-way ANOVA test was performed (α=0.05). The linear fits between the cumulative F- release profiles of RC and KM and time were weak. KN and V presented a strong relationship between cumulative F- release and time. There were significant differences between the daily F- release overtime up to the third day only for GICs materials. The daily F- release means for RC were similar overtime. The results indicate that the F- release profile of the nanofilled resin-modified GIC is comparable to the resin-modified GIC.

Download Full-text

Bond strength of a resin composite and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement associated or not with chlorhexidine to eroded dentin

Brazilian Dental Science ◽

10.14295/bds.2015.v18i2.1101 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 18 (2) ◽

pp. 31

Author(s):

Flavia Pardo Salata Nahsan ◽

Martha Beteghelli Michielin ◽

Luciana Mendonça Da Silva ◽

Camila Moreira Machado ◽

Andréa Mello De Andrade ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Bond Strength ◽

Resin Composite ◽

Artificial Saliva ◽

Glass Ionomer Cement ◽

Acrylic Resin ◽

Cervical Region ◽

Glass Ionomer ◽

Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽

Prior Application ◽

Ionomer Cement

Objective: Even resin composites and glass-ionomer cements are widely used for dental cervical region restorations, under erosive condition they can wear out quickly. This study aimed to compare, by means of bond strength by microshear, the performance of a resin composite (RC) and a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC) to eroded dentin and its association with 2% chlorhexidine up to 6 months. Material and Methods:. Eighty sound third molars teeth were cutt to obtain flat coronal dentin, which were subsequently embedded in self-curing acrylic resin circular molds exposing only this surface available. Teeth were divided into two groups, according to the treatment with the Adper Single Bond 2 + RC Filtek Z250 (Z) or the RMGIC Vitremer (V). Half of the specimens were immersed in artificial saliva-AS for 24 hours (control groups) and half subjected to 3x/1 minute daily immersion in Regular Coca Cola ®-RC for 5 days. Half of the specimens for each described condition were treated with water and half with 2% chlorhexidine for 1 minute prior the restoration. For all groups, the specimens were stored in artificial saliva weekly renewed up to tests. The bonding strength was evaluated by microshear test after 1 month and 6 months . Data, in normal distribution, were analyzed with 3-way ANOVA and Tukey (p <0.05). Results: Challenge factors, materials and time were statistically significant.. Restorations with Z showed significantly higher bond strength compared to V in all situations. There was a reduction in bond strength values over time for all tested conditions. The prior application of 2% chlorhexidine was able to preserve the Z bond strength between 1 and 6 months, but this factor was not statistically significant. Conclusion: For eroded dentin, the use of resin composite seems presents greater bond strength compared to resin-modified glass-material, disregarding their association to chlorhexidine or not.

Download Full-text

Sealing ability of materials used as protective cervical barrier in internal tooth bleaching

RSBO ◽

10.21726/rsbo.v14i2.641 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 14 (2) ◽

pp. 67-73

Author(s):

Juan Fernando Ordoñéz-Aguilera ◽

Rafael Massunari Maenosono ◽

Denise Ferracioli Oda ◽

Heitor Marques Honório ◽

Rafael Francisco Lia Mondelli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Resin Composite ◽

Glass Ionomer Cement ◽

Rank Correlation ◽

In Vitro Study ◽

Tooth Bleaching ◽

Glass Ionomer ◽

Sealing Ability ◽

Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽

Ionomer Cement

The use of a protective cervical barrier (PCB) is very well established to perform a safe internal bleaching; however, there is still no consensus on which material has the best sealing ability. Objective: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the apical and linear sealing of different PCB materials placed during internal bleaching. Material and methods: This study had two study factors: PCB positioning, divided at two levels (cement-enamel junction [CEJ] and 1mm above the cement enamel junction [CEJ+1]); and PCB material, divided at eight levels (resin composite [RC], glass ionomer cement [GIC], resin-modified glass ionomer cement liner [LRGIC], restorative resin-modified glass ionomer cement [RRGIC], zinc phosphate cement [ZPC], eugenol-free zinc oxide cement [ZOC], provisional filling resin [PFR] and gutta-percha as control [GUT]). Response variables were apical and linear sealing obtained through dye penetration and analyzed with a digital microscope. Data were subjected to two-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey test (p<0.05). Results: The main factor for both apical and linear sealing was the type of material (p<0.01) regardless of their position. RC and ZPC presented the worst sealing values (p<0.05). The Spearman rank correlation coefficient revealed a positive correlation between the apical and linear leakage. Conclusion: The results suggest that RC and ZPC must be avoided as a PCB during internal bleaching procedures.

Download Full-text

Fluoride Release from Glass Ionomer Cement and Resin-modified Glass Ionomer Cement Materials under Conditions Mimicking the Caries Process

Operative Dentistry ◽

10.2341/19-296-l ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

A Brenes-Alvarado ◽

JA Cury

Keyword(s):

Resin Composite ◽

Glass Ionomer Cement ◽

Fluoride Concentration ◽

Negative Control ◽

Fluoride Release ◽

Glass Ionomer ◽

Period 2 ◽

Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽

Ph Cycling ◽

Ionomer Cement

SUMMARY The anticaries potential of restorative ionomeric materials should be evaluated under a pH-cycling regime that simulates the caries process of demineralization and remineralization. Ten glass ionomer cement (GIC) materials and five resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC) materials were evaluated. A resin composite was used as a negative control. Six discs of each material were immersed for 6 and 18 hours each day in demineralizing (De-) and remineralizing (Re-) solutions, respectively. The solutions were changed daily over 12 days, during which the fluoride concentration was determined using an ion-specific electrode. The results were expressed as (1) the daily fluoride concentration in the De- and Re- solutions (μg F/ml), (2) the amount of fluoride released daily in the De- + Re- solution per area of specimens (μg F/cm2/day), and (3) the cumulative release over the 12-day period (μg F/cm2). During the first days, all materials showed a surge in fluoride release, followed by a gradual decline; however, three distinct patterns were observed, specifically: (1) greater fluoride release in the De- solution compared to the Re- solution during the study period; (2) an initial higher release in De- solution; and (3) a similar release in both solutions over the whole period. The materials differed statistically (p<0.05) with respect to daily and cumulative fluoride release. One GIC (Maxxion R) and one RMGIC (Resiglass R) had the highest and lowest ability to release fluoride, respectively. In conclusion, the GICs and RMGICs evaluated exhibited distinct qualitative and quantitative patterns of fluoride release under conditions simulating the caries process, which might reflect their anticaries potential.

Download Full-text

Sealing ability of materials used as protective cervical barrier in internal tooth bleaching

RSBO ◽

10.21726/rsbo.v1i2.405 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 1 (2) ◽

pp. 67

Author(s):

Juan Fernando Ordoñéz-Aguilera ◽

Rafael Massunari Maenosono ◽

Denise Ferracioli Oda ◽

Heitor Marques Honório ◽

Rafael Francisco Lia Mondelli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Resin Composite ◽

Glass Ionomer Cement ◽

In Vitro Study ◽

Tooth Bleaching ◽

Glass Ionomer ◽

Sealing Ability ◽

Resin Modified Glass Ionomer ◽

Materials Used ◽

Ionomer Cement

The use of a protective cervical barrier (PCB) is very well established to perform a safe internal bleaching; however, there is still no consensus on which material has the best sealing ability. Objective: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the apical and linear sealing of different PCB materials placed during internalbleaching. Material and methods: This study had two study factors: PCB positioning, divided at two levels (cement-enamel junction [CEJ] and 1mm above the cement enamel junction [CEJ+1]); and PCB material, divided at eight levels (resin composite [RC], glass ionomer cement [GIC], resin-modified glass ionomer cement liner [LRGIC], restorative resin-modified glass ionomer cement [RRGIC], zinc phosphate cement [ZPC], eugenol-free zinc oxide cement [ZOC],provisional filling resin [PFR] and gutta-percha as control [GUT]). Response variables were apical and linear sealing obtained through dye penetration and analyzed with a digital microscope. Data were subjected to two-way analysis of variance followed by Tukey test (p<0.05). Results: The main factor for both apical and linear sealing was the type of material (p<0.01), regardless of their position. RC and ZPC presented the worst sealing values (p<0.05). The Spearmanrank correlation coefficient revealed a positive correlation between the apical and linear leakage. Conclusion: The results suggest that RC and ZPC must be avoided as a PCB during internal bleaching procedures.

Download Full-text