Clinical diagnosis of soft tissue tumors**Instructional course lecture presented at the 30th Annual Musculoskeletal Tumor Meeting of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association in Nagoya on July 19, 1997

1998 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 225-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noriyoshi Kawaguchi ◽  
Seiichi Matsumoto ◽  
Jun Manabe
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Clinical Diagnosis ◽  
Japanese Orthopaedic Association ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumors ◽  
Musculoskeletal Tumor

scholarly journals Profile of Musculoskeletal Tumor in Saiful Anwar General Hospital Malang from January 2011 until December 2018

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 81
Author(s):  
Istan Irmansyah Irsan ◽  
Satria Pandu Persada Isma ◽  
Abdul Aziz ◽  
Muhammad Hilman Bimadi ◽  
I Gusti Ngurah Arga Aldrian Oktafandi
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
General Hospital ◽  
Bone Tumor ◽  
Bone Tumors ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumors ◽  
Musculoskeletal Tumor ◽  
Primary Bone Tumors ◽  
Musculoskeletal Tumors ◽  
Primary Bone

Abstract: Musculoskeletal tumors are relatively rare, with 0.2%-0.5% of all malignant tumors in all ages. The geographic distribution of musculoskeletal tumors varies significantly around the world. This study aims to describe the musculoskeletal tumor profile in Saiful Anwar General Hospital. All data were obtained from the department of orthopaedic and traumatology database, Saiful Anwar general hospital. Thus, patients who were diagnosed with either bone tumor or soft tissue tumor between January 2011 to December 2018 were selected for the present study. The clinical-pathological conference (CPC) was carried out to ensure the validity of all the registered data. A total of 577 patients with tumors from January 2011 to December 2018 was obtained. Out of all the cases, 439 (76%) cases are bone tumors, and the remaining 138 (24%) cases are soft tissue tumors. The most frequent locations of the musculoskeletal tumors are the long bones of the thigh and lower leg. This study shows an increasing trend in musculoskeletal tumors incidence, despite decreasing numbers in several years. This result goes along with a rising trend in malignancy cases with a higher amount compared to the benign one. Moreover, MBD and osteosarcoma were found to be the most common tumor and primary bone tumors, respectively. However, the fact that there is some data loss in the study limited the study for a more accurate result.   Keywords: Musculoskeletal tumor; Bone tumor; Osteosarcoma; Malang; East Java

Localization of Gallium-67 in Peritoneal Cells by Electron Microscopic Autoradiography

1973 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 404-405
Author(s):  
D. C. Swartzendruber ◽  
Norma L. Idoyaga-Vargas
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Tumor Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumors ◽  
Clinical Usefulness ◽  
Electron Microscopic ◽  
Normal Cells ◽  
Electron Microscopic Autoradiography ◽  
Peritoneal Cells ◽  
Gallium 67

The radionuclide gallium-67 (67Ga) localizes preferentially but not specifically in many human and experimental soft-tissue tumors. Because of this localization, 67Ga is used in clinical trials to detect humar. cancers by external scintiscanning methods. However, the fact that 67Ga does not localize specifically in tumors requires for its eventual clinical usefulness a fuller understanding of the mechanisms that control its deposition in both malignant and normal cells. We have previously reported that 67Ga localizes in lysosomal-like bodies, notably, although not exclusively, in macrophages of the spocytaneous AKR thymoma. Further studies on the uptake of 67Ga by macrophages are needed to determine whether there are factors related to malignancy that might alter the localization of 67Ga in these cells and thus provide clues to discovering the mechanism of 67Ga localization in tumor tissue.

Percutaneous Imaging-Guided versus Open Musculoskeletal Biopsy: Concepts and Controversies

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (06) ◽  
pp. 667-675
Author(s):  
Violeta Vasilevska Nikodinovska ◽  
Slavcho Ivanoski ◽  
Milan Samardziski ◽  
Vesna Janevska
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Core Needle Biopsy ◽  
Multidisciplinary Team ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
Needle Biopsy ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumors ◽  
Open Biopsy ◽  
Core Needle ◽  
Similar Accuracy

AbstractBone and soft tissue tumors are a largely heterogeneous group of tumors. Biopsy of musculoskeletal (MSK) tumors is sometimes a challenging procedure. Although the open biopsy is still considered the gold standard for the biopsy of MSK lesions, core needle biopsy can replace it in most cases, with similar accuracy and a low complication rate. The biopsy should be performed in a tertiary sarcoma center where the multidisciplinary team consists of at minimum a tumor surgeon, an MSK pathologist, and an MSK radiologist who can assess all steps of the procedure. Several factors can influence the success of the biopsy including the lesion characteristics, the equipment, and the method used for the procedure. This review highlights some of the important aspects regarding the biopsy of the MSK tumors, with special attention to imaging a guided core needle biopsy and highlighting some of the recent advancements and controversies in the field.

Evaluation of Lipomatous Soft Tissue Tumors by MR Imaging

1994 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 367-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gelineck ◽  
J. Keller ◽  
O. Myhre Jensen ◽  
O. Steen Nielsen ◽  
T. Christensen
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Mr Imaging ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumors

Imaging of soft tissue tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinji Tsukamoto ◽  
Andreas F. Mavrogenis ◽  
Yasuhito Tanaka ◽  
Costantino Errani
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Evaluation Criteria ◽  
Soft Tissue Tumors ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Benign Soft Tissue Tumors ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy

: Differentiation of malignant from benign soft tissue tumors is challenging with imaging alone, including that by magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. However, the accuracy of this differentiation has increased owing to the development of novel imaging technology. Detailed patient history and physical examination remain essential for differentiation between benign and malignant soft tissue tumors. Moreover, measurement only of tumor size based on Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors criteria is insufficient for the evaluation of response to chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Change in metabolic activity measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography or dynamic contrast enhanced-derived quantitative endpoints can more accurately evaluate treatment response compared to change in tumor size. Magnetic resonance imaging can accurately evaluate essential factors in surgical planning such as vascular or bone invasion and “tail sign”. Thus, imaging plays a critical role in the diagnosis and treatment of soft tissue tumors.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document