White-clot-syndrome in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II with cross reactivity to danaparoid

2000 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-129
Author(s):  
G. Pfeiffer ◽  
J. Eberhardt ◽  
R. Hamann
2003 ◽  
Vol 56 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 247-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nebojsa Antonijevic ◽  
Milica Stanojevic ◽  
Rajko Milosevic ◽  
Danijela Mikovic ◽  
Mirjana Kovac ◽  
...  

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) Management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and treatment options have significantly changed recently. Heparin may induce two types of thrombocytopenia. Type I, occurring earlier with a much higher rate of incidence (5-30%), is characterized by mild thrombocytopenia without significant clinical manifestations. Type II is less frequent (0.5-2%), life threatening immune type, develops following a period of minimum 5-7 days upon introduction of heparin therapy (patients earlier treated with heparin are excluded). Type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with severely reduced platelet count may be clinically manifested by thrombosis in 20-50% cases within the period of 30 days. HIT is suspected in persons resistant to heparin with relatively reduced platelet count, though HIT is described in person with normal platelet counts, as well. None of available assays used for HIT detection is completely reliable Sensitivity of a highly specific platelet aggregation assay is only 36% sensitivity and specificity of 14C-serotonin release assays amounts to 95% while ELISA using a heparin/platelet factor-4 target has a sensitivity of 85%. Thus, it is sometimes necessary to combine functional and antigen assays. Furthermore, new classes of antigen assays, like antibody detection tests of complexes between heparin and neutrophil-activating peptide-2 as well as those between heparin and interleukin-8, have been used. Current therapy options Current therapy options exclude formerly applied low-molecular-weight heparins due to the existing cross-reactivity of 80?100%. Danaparoid sodium exhibits in vitro cross-reactivity of 10?61%, clinically manifested in less than 5% of patients. Two drugs are drugs of choice in HIT type II treatment: lepirudin, especially in patients without renal failure and argatroban, particularly in patients with renal failure. The following procedures and agents are also efficient: asmapheresis in the first four days, high-dose intravenous gammaglobulin, antiagregans, especially ADP antagonists, aspirin, dipirydamole, dextran, prostacyclin analogues thrombolytic therapy as well as thromboembolectomy. Oral anticoagulants are not administered in active HIT type II, in deep vein thrombosis with high international normalized ratio (INR) and thrombin-antithrombin complexes, and low protein C levels to avoid the possibility of venous limb gangrene development. They can be administered in a stable phase, when the thrombin generation is controlled by previous administration of one of the above-mentioned alternative anticoagulants.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1775-1775 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Bradner ◽  
Robert K. Hallisey ◽  
David J. Kuter

Abstract The development of new non-heparin anticoagulant therapies has increased interest in the treatment of type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Standard therapy involves administration of an intravenous direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI), either argatroban or lepirudin. Due to a lack of cross-reactivity to HIT antibodies in vitro, the synthetic pentasaccharide fondaparinux sodium is an appealing alternative, but its use in this disorder has not been comprehensively examined. Here, we report our experience with fondaparinux in HIT and an analysis of safety and efficacy in this setting. We reviewed all in-patient cases of HIT at the Massachusetts General Hospital that were confirmed by the heparin-platelet factor 4 antibody test and were treated with fondaparinux. Twenty patients satisfied diagnostic criteria for HIT. Each patient studied lacked another competing, compelling etiology for thrombocytopenia and was treated with fondaparinux for more than five days within one month of diagnosis. The average duration of therapy was 17 days and 16 patients (80%) were treated within two weeks of diagnosis. Patients were grouped according to whether they received fondaparinux after initial therapy with a DTI (n=10) or as initial treatment following the diagnosis of HIT (n=10). The initial dose of fondaparinux administered was 2.5 mg in 18 patients. Neither absolute nor relative thrombocytopenia was identified in either group following treatment. Patients with HIT treated with fondaparinux while thrombocytopenic experienced platelet recovery on average in 3.7 days, as represented in Figure 1. In addition, there were no observed thrombotic complications among patients treated with fondaparinux. In this analysis of a high-risk group of inpatients with type-II HIT, fondaparinux was tolerated without the continuation or recurrence of thrombocytopenia. This suggests that cross-reactivity between the heparin-PF4 antibody and fondaparinux is not likely to be clinically significant. Additionally, the absence of thrombotic sequelae among fondaparinux-treated patients argues that fondaparinux may be a well-tolerated, effective treatment for this morbid, prothrombotic disorder. A prospective trial of fondaparinux in the treatment of type-II HIT is planned. Figure Figure


2000 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 324-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Koster ◽  
Oliver Meyer ◽  
Harald Hausmann ◽  
Herrmann Kuppe ◽  
Roland Hetzer ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. E374-E376 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ferdinand Vogt ◽  
Andres Beiras-Fernandez ◽  
Marion Weis ◽  
Ralf Sodian ◽  
Bruno Reichart ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 951-955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshinori Tanigawa ◽  
Tomoko Yamada ◽  
Koichi Matsumoto ◽  
Akira Nakagawachi ◽  
Arisu Torikai ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 125 (12) ◽  
pp. 1585-1587
Author(s):  
Kathleen J. Smith ◽  
Juan Rosario-Collazo ◽  
Henry Skelton

Abstract Hirudin is one of the new synthetic antithrombin agents, which is most commonly used in patients with type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and in patients with hypersensitivity reactions to unfractionated heparin as well as low-molecular-weight heparins. Hirudin is comparable to heparin as an antithrombotic agent and also has been studied as a primary treatment in patients who experienced acute myocardial infarctions. We describe a patient with a history of type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia who was placed on intravenous hirudin therapy. After extravasation of the intravenous hirudin site, the patient developed a delayed hypersensitivity reaction that histologically showed an epithelioid granulomatous infiltrate. Although rare reports of hypersensitivity reactions to hirudin have been published, these reactions have not been well characterized and the histopathologic changes have not been described.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document