Anesthetic management during minimally invasive cardiac surgery with the Port-Access system for closure of atrial septal defect

2000 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 98-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatsuya Yamada ◽  
Ryoichi Ochiai ◽  
Junzo Takeda
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Atrial Septal Defect ◽  
Septal Defect ◽  
Anesthetic Management ◽  
Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Access System ◽  
Port Access

scholarly journals Comparison of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Capacity in Patients with Atrial Septal Defect Treated with Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery or Transcatheter Closure

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (8) ◽  
pp. 3879
Author(s):  
Hicaz Zencirkiran Agus ◽  
Serkan Kahraman ◽  
Mehmet Erturk ◽  
Burak Onan ◽  
Ali Kemal Kalkan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Atrial Septal Defect ◽  
Exercise Capacity ◽  
Septal Defect ◽  
Transcatheter Closure ◽  
Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Exercise ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Exercise Capacity ◽  
Asd Closure

Aim. The main aim of our study was to compare the results of transcatheter atrial septal defect (ASD) closure versus minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) focusing on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity and echocardiographic findings preoperatively and 1 month after defect closure.Material and methods. 54 patients with ASD and finally 43 patients who were followed up were included in the study. 21 patients were in MICS (robotic or endoscopic approach) and 22 patients were in transcatheter closure arm. All patients investigated in detail by transesophageal echocardiography and underwent cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). At the end of first month, CPET and transthorasic echocardiography were reperformed.Results. There was significant improvement of physical capacity after 1 month following the transcatheter closure procedure documented by exercise time and VO 2 max. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and tricuspid lateral annular systolic velocity (Tri S) were not changed. In surgery group right heart diameters declined significantly; but VO 2 max, TAPSE and Tri S significantly decreased.Conclusion. Cardiopulmonary exercise function is increased in transcatheter closure group 1 month after closure and contrary not in MICS group. This may be caused by long recovery time of the right ventricle after surgery. Device closure of ASD is preferable to surgical closure if the anatomy is suitable. However, MICS for ASD closure is safe, with short recovery period and less scarring.

scholarly journals Comparison of Clinical Outcomes After Transcatheter vs. Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery Closure for Atrial Septal Defect

2017 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. 543-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masaki Kodaira ◽  
Akio Kawamura ◽  
Kazuma Okamoto ◽  
Hideaki Kanazawa ◽  
Yugo Minakata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Atrial Septal Defect ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Septal Defect ◽  
Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery

Surgical closure of atrial septal defect Minimally invasive cardiac surgery or median sternotomy?

1998 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 820-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. H. Chang ◽  
P. J. Lin ◽  
J. J. Chu ◽  
H. P. Liu ◽  
F. C. Tsai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Atrial Septal Defect ◽  
Septal Defect ◽  
Median Sternotomy ◽  
Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Surgical Closure

The Role of Transesophageal Echocardiography During Port-Access Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery.

1999 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 595-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERT M. APPLEBAUM ◽  
STEPHEN B. COLVIN ◽  
AUBREY C. GALLOWAY ◽  
GREG H. RIBAKOVE ◽  
EUGENE A. GROSSI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Transesophageal Echocardiography ◽  
Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Port Access
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document