Subnuclear localization of S/MAR-binding proteins is differently affected by in vitro stabilization with heat or Cu 2+

Chromosoma ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 106 (2) ◽  
pp. 81-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca M. Neri ◽  
Frank O. Fackelmayer ◽  
Marina Zweyer ◽  
Terumi Kohwi-Shigematsu ◽  
Alberto M. Martelli
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Subnuclear Localization ◽  
Mar Binding Proteins

Subnuclear compartmentalization of sequence-specific transcription factors and regulation of eukaryotic gene expression

2005 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. 535-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gareth N Corry ◽  
D Alan Underhill
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Nuclear Architecture ◽  
Subnuclear Localization ◽  
Modular Structures

To date, the majority of the research regarding eukaryotic transcription factors has focused on characterizing their function primarily through in vitro methods. These studies have revealed that transcription factors are essentially modular structures, containing separate regions that participate in such activities as DNA binding, protein–protein interaction, and transcriptional activation or repression. To fully comprehend the behavior of a given transcription factor, however, these domains must be analyzed in the context of the entire protein, and in certain cases the context of a multiprotein complex. Furthermore, it must be appreciated that transcription factors function in the nucleus, where they must contend with a variety of factors, including the nuclear architecture, chromatin domains, chromosome territories, and cell-cycle-associated processes. Recent examinations of transcription factors in the nucleus have clarified the behavior of these proteins in vivo and have increased our understanding of how gene expression is regulated in eukaryotes. Here, we review the current knowledge regarding sequence-specific transcription factor compartmentalization within the nucleus and discuss its impact on the regulation of such processes as activation or repression of gene expression and interaction with coregulatory factors.Key words: transcription, subnuclear localization, chromatin, gene expression, nuclear architecture.

scholarly journals Interaction between Poly(ADP-ribose) and NuMA Contributes to Mitotic Spindle Pole Assembly

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (21) ◽  
pp. 4575-4585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Chang ◽  
Margaret Coughlin ◽  
Timothy J. Mitchison
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Magnetic Beads ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Covalent Modification ◽  
Mitotic Spindles ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Tankyrase 1 ◽  
Mitotic Spindle Pole

Poly(ADP-ribose) (pADPr), made by PARP-5a/tankyrase-1, localizes to the poles of mitotic spindles and is required for bipolar spindle assembly, but its molecular function in the spindle is poorly understood. To investigate this, we localized pADPr at spindle poles by immuno-EM. We then developed a concentrated mitotic lysate system from HeLa cells to probe spindle pole assembly in vitro. Microtubule asters assembled in response to centrosomes and Ran-GTP in this system. Magnetic beads coated with pADPr, extended from PARP-5a, also triggered aster assembly, suggesting a functional role of the pADPr in spindle pole assembly. We found that PARP-5a is much more active in mitosis than interphase. We used mitotic PARP-5a, self-modified with pADPr chains, to capture mitosis-specific pADPr-binding proteins. Candidate binding proteins included the spindle pole protein NuMA previously shown to bind to PARP-5a directly. The rod domain of NuMA, expressed in bacteria, bound directly to pADPr. We propose that pADPr provides a dynamic cross-linking function at spindle poles by extending from covalent modification sites on PARP-5a and NuMA and binding noncovalently to NuMA and that this function helps promote assembly of exactly two poles.

Shark Attack: High affinity binding proteins derived from shark vNAR domains by stepwise in vitro affinity maturation

2014 ◽  
Vol 191 ◽  
pp. 236-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Zielonka ◽  
Niklas Weber ◽  
Stefan Becker ◽  
Achim Doerner ◽  
Andreas Christmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Affinity Maturation ◽  
Affinity Binding ◽  
High Affinity Binding ◽  
High Affinity

scholarly journals GH/IGF e neoplasia: o que há de novo nesta associação

2005 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 833-842 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela M. Spinola e Castro ◽  
Gil Guerra-Júnior
Keyword(s):  
Growth Factors ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Igf Binding Proteins ◽  
Igf I ◽  
Ciclo Celular ◽  
Igf Binding ◽  
Insulin Like Growth Factors

Estudos in vitro e em animais sugerem que os membros do sistema insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), incluindo IGF-I, IGF-II, receptores de IGF-I e IGF-II (IGF-IR e IGF-IIR), e as IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs) podem ter um importante envolvimento no desenvolvimento e na progressão de neoplasias. Mais especificamente, as IGFs promovem a progressão do ciclo celular e inibem a apoptose tanto por ação direta com outros fatores de crescimento como por ação indireta interagindo com outros sistemas moleculares intracelulares envolvidos na promoção e/ou progressão do câncer. Além disso, inúmeros estudos epidemiológicos têm sugerido que concentrações elevadas das IGFs, independente das alterações nas IGFBPs, podem estar associadas a um aumento no risco de desenvolver determinadas neoplasias. Esta revisão tem como objetivo apresentar o envolvimento do sistema IGF na regulação tumoral, os principais estudos epidemiológicos realizados e o risco de desenvolvimento de neoplasia em pacientes (com ou sem história pessoal de neoplasia prévia) que receberam hormônio de crescimento (rhGH). É importante salientar que o uso clínico de rhGH, nas indicações aprovadas internacionalmente, é seguro e não existem evidências, até o momento, da associação com o desenvolvimento de neoplasias.

scholarly journals Identification of mRNAs Associated with αCP2-Containing RNP Complexes

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (19) ◽  
pp. 7055-7067 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelly A. Waggoner ◽  
Stephen A. Liebhaber
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Cell Function ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Translation Control ◽  
Viral Mrnas ◽  
Posttranscriptional Gene Regulation ◽  
Direct Binding

ABSTRACT Posttranscriptional controls in higher eukaryotes are central to cell differentiation and developmental programs. These controls reflect sequence-specific interactions of mRNAs with one or more RNA binding proteins. The α-globin poly(C) binding proteins (αCPs) comprise a highly abundant subset of K homology (KH) domain RNA binding proteins and have a characteristic preference for binding single-stranded C-rich motifs. αCPs have been implicated in translation control and stabilization of multiple cellular and viral mRNAs. To explore the full contribution of αCPs to cell function, we have identified a set of mRNAs that associate in vivo with the major αCP2 isoforms. One hundred sixty mRNA species were consistently identified in three independent analyses of αCP2-RNP complexes immunopurified from a human hematopoietic cell line (K562). These mRNAs could be grouped into subsets encoding cytoskeletal components, transcription factors, proto-oncogenes, and cell signaling factors. Two mRNAs were linked to ceroid lipofuscinosis, indicating a potential role for αCP2 in this infantile neurodegenerative disease. Surprisingly, αCP2 mRNA itself was represented in αCP2-RNP complexes, suggesting autoregulatory control of αCP2 expression. In vitro analyses of representative target mRNAs confirmed direct binding of αCP2 within their 3′ untranslated regions. These data expand the list of mRNAs that associate with αCP2 in vivo and establish a foundation for modeling its role in coordinating pathways of posttranscriptional gene regulation.

In Vitro Biochemical Characterization of Cytokinesis Actin-Binding Proteins

2016 ◽  
pp. 151-179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis Zimmermann ◽  
Alisha N. Morganthaler ◽  
David R. Kovar ◽  
Cristian Suarez
Keyword(s):  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Biochemical Characterization ◽  
Actin Binding ◽  
Actin Binding Proteins

scholarly journals SSMART: Sequence-structure motif identification for RNA-binding proteins

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alina Munteanu ◽  
Neelanjan Mukherjee ◽  
Uwe Ohler
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Binding Proteins ◽  
Rna Binding ◽  
Rna Binding Proteins ◽  
Sequence Motif ◽  
Primary Sequence ◽  
Sequence Structure ◽  
Rna Targets

AbstractMotivationRNA-binding proteins (RBPs) regulate every aspect of RNA metabolism and function. There are hundreds of RBPs encoded in the eukaryotic genomes, and each recognize its RNA targets through a specific mixture of RNA sequence and structure properties. For most RBPs, however, only a primary sequence motif has been determined, while the structure of the binding sites is uncharacterized.ResultsWe developed SSMART, an RNA motif finder that simultaneously models the primary sequence and the structural properties of the RNA targets sites. The sequence-structure motifs are represented as consensus strings over a degenerate alphabet, extending the IUPAC codes for nucleotides to account for secondary structure preferences. Evaluation on synthetic data showed that SSMART is able to recover both sequence and structure motifs implanted into 3‘UTR-like sequences, for various degrees of structured/unstructured binding sites. In addition, we successfully used SSMART on high-throughput in vivo and in vitro data, showing that we not only recover the known sequence motif, but also gain insight into the structural preferences of the RBP.AvailabilitySSMART is freely available at https://ohlerlab.mdc-berlin.de/software/SSMART_137/[email protected]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document