Topodiagnostic assessment of occupational noise-induced hearing loss using distortion-product otoacoustic emissions compared to the short increment sensitivity index test

1999 ◽  
Vol 256 (3) ◽  
pp. 115-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Oeken
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Otoacoustic Emissions ◽  
Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions ◽  
Sensitivity Index ◽  
Index Test ◽  
Noise Induced Hearing Loss ◽  
Occupational Noise ◽  
Distortion Product

Relationship Between Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions and Hearing Loss

2006 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-9
Author(s):  
Tiffany A. Johnson ◽  
Stephen T. Neely ◽  
Michael P. Gorga
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Otoacoustic Emissions ◽  
Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions ◽  
Distortion Product

Vocal Performance Teachers and Hearing Loss

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-24
Author(s):  
Vance Gunnell ◽  
Jeff Larsen
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Otoacoustic Emissions ◽  
Noise Exposure ◽  
Vocal Performance ◽  
Occupational Noise ◽  
Hearing Conservation ◽  
Occupational Noise Exposure ◽  
Distortion Product ◽  
Hearing Thresholds ◽  
Performance Teachers

Hearing thresholds and distortion product otoacoustic emissions were measured for teachers of vocal performance who were gathered for a national conference. Results showed mean audiometric thresholds to be consistent with noise induced hearing loss, more than what would be expected with normal aging. Years of instruction and age were considered as factors in the hearing loss observed. It was concluded that hearing conservation should be initiated with this group to help raise awareness and protect them from hearing loss due to occupational noise exposure.

scholarly journals Hearing Screening of Newborns using Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-195
Author(s):  
Vybhavi MK ◽  
Srinivas V
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Otoacoustic Emissions ◽  
Screening Tool ◽  
Hearing Screening ◽  
Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions ◽  
Profound Hearing Loss ◽  
Distortion Product ◽  
Lost To Follow Up ◽  
Evoked Response Audiometry

Introduction  The present study was devised to estimate the prevalence of neonatal hearing loss and document the importance of using DPOAE as a screening tool for identifying hearing loss in newborns. Materials and Methods This hospital based descriptive study was conducted from August 2018 to August 2019. A total of 928 newborn babies were included in the study. These newborn babies were subjected to hearing screening by distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) at 24-72 hrs after birth. For pass cases, no further testing was done. For refer cases, repeat testing with DPOAE was done within 15-30 days. Newborns with refer result on repeat DPOAE testing were subjected to Brainstem evoked response audiometry (BERA) within 3 months to confirm hearing loss. Results Nine hundred and twenty eight newborn babies were screened by DPOAE. 851 newborns passed the first DPOAE hearing screening and 77 newborns gave refer result. 21 newborns were lost to follow-up. 56 newborns underwent repeat DPOAE testing and 5 newborns were referred for BERA. Amongst the 5 newborns who underwent BERA testing, one newborn was diagnosed with bilateral profound hearing loss. Hence, the prevalence of hearing loss of 1.08 per thousand newborn babies was estimated in this study. Conclusion Hearing screening of newborns using DPOAE followed by BERA in refer cases to confirm hearing loss is useful for early detection followed by timely intervention and rehabilitation.

Accuracy of velocity distortion product otoacoustic emissions for estimating mechanically based hearing loss

2009 ◽  
Vol 251 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 17-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Turcanu ◽  
Ernst Dalhoff ◽  
Marcus Müller ◽  
Hans-Peter Zenner ◽  
Anthony W. Gummer
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Otoacoustic Emissions ◽  
Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions ◽  
Distortion Product

scholarly journals Risk Assessment of Recreational Noise–Induced Hearing Loss from Exposure through a Personal Audio System—iPod Touch

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (07) ◽  
pp. 619-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamakshi V. Gopal ◽  
Liana E. Mills ◽  
Bryce S. Phillips ◽  
Rajesh Nandy
Keyword(s):  
Hearing Loss ◽  
Otoacoustic Emissions ◽  
Pure Tone ◽  
Risk Indicator ◽  
Noise Induced Hearing Loss ◽  
Ipod Touch ◽  
Distortion Product ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Within Subjects ◽  
Loud Music

AbstractRecreational noise–induced hearing loss (RNIHL) is a major health issue and presents a huge economic burden on society. Exposure to loud music is not considered hazardous in our society because music is thought to be a source of relaxation and entertainment. However, there is evidence that regardless of the sound source, frequent exposure to loud music, including through personal audio systems (PAS), can lead to hearing loss, tinnitus, difficulty processing speech, and increased susceptibility to age-related hearing loss.Several studies have documented temporary threshold shifts (TTS) (a risk indicator of future permanent impairment) in subjects that listen to loud music through their PAS. However, there is not enough information regarding volume settings that may be considered to be safe. As a primary step toward quantifying the risk of RNIHL through PAS, we assessed changes in auditory test measures before and after exposure to music through the popular iPod Touch device set at various volume levels.This project design incorporated aspects of both between- and within-subjects and used repeated measures to analyze individual groups.A total of 40 adults, aged 18–31 years with normal hearing were recruited and randomly distributed to four groups. Each group consisted of five males and five females.Subjects underwent two rounds of testing (pre- and postmusic exposure), with a 30-min interval, where they listened to a playlist consisting of popular songs through an iPod at 100%, 75%, 50%, or 0% volume (no music). Based on our analysis on the Knowles Electronic Manikin for Acoustic Research, with a standardized 711 coupler, it was determined that listening to the playlist for 30 min through standard earbuds resulted in an average level of 97.0 dBC at 100% volume, 83.3 dBC at 75% volume, and 65.6 dBC at 50% volume. Pure-tone thresholds from 500–8000 Hz, extended high-frequency pure tones between 9–12.5 kHz, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAE) were obtained before and after the 30-min music exposure. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed with two between-subjects factors (volume and gender) and one within-subjects factor (frequency). Change (shift) in auditory test measures was used as the outcome for the ANOVA.Results indicated significant worsening of pure-tone thresholds following music exposure only in the group that was exposed to 100% volume at the following frequencies: 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 kHz. DPOAEs showed significant decrease at 2000 and 2822 Hz, also only for the 100% volume condition. No significant changes were found between pre- and postmusic exposure measures in groups exposed to 75%, 50%, or 0% volume conditions. Follow-up evaluations conducted a week later indicated that pure-tone thresholds had returned to the premusic exposure levels.These results provide quantifiable information regarding safe volume control settings on the iPod Touch with standard earbuds. Listening to music using the iPod Touch at 100% volume setting for as little as 30 min leads to TTS and worsening of otoacoustic emissions, a risk for permanent auditory damage.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document