Central complex substructures are required for the maintenance of locomotor activity in Drosophila melanogaster

1999 ◽  
Vol 185 (3) ◽  
pp. 277-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.-R. Martin ◽  
T. Raabe ◽  
M. Heisenberg
2012 ◽  
Vol 520 (5) ◽  
pp. 970-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christiane Hermann ◽  
Taishi Yoshii ◽  
Verena Dusik ◽  
Charlotte Helfrich-Förster

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Tomita ◽  
Gosuke Ban ◽  
Yoshiaki S. Kato ◽  
Kazuhiko Kume

AbstractThe central complex is one of the major brain regions that control sleep in Drosophila, but the circuitry details of sleep regulation have yet to be elucidated. Here, we show a novel sleep-regulating neuronal circuit in the protocerebral bridge (PB) of the central complex. Activation of the PB interneurons labeled by the R59E08-Gal4 and the PB columnar neurons in the R52B10-Gal4 promoted sleep and wakefulness, respectively. A targeted GFP reconstitution across synaptic partners (t-GRASP) analysis demonstrated synaptic contacts between these two groups of sleep-regulating PB neurons. Furthermore, we found that activation of a pair of dopaminergic (DA) neurons projecting to the PB (T1 DA neurons) decreased sleep. The wake-promoting T1 DA neurons and the sleep-promoting PB interneurons formed close associations. Dopamine 2-like receptor (Dop2R) knockdown in the sleep-promoting PB interneurons increased sleep. These results indicated that the neuronal circuit in the PB regulated by dopamine signaling mediates sleep-wakefulness.


1987 ◽  
Vol 42 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 1335-1338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Helfrich ◽  
Wolfgang Engelmann

per° Mutants of Drosophila melanogaster which are exposed to light-dark cycles (LD) with different Zeitgeber period (T) have a limited range of entrainment. Entrained flies show a characteristic phase relationship of activity to the LD which depends on the period of the driving cycle as expected by oscillator theory. Both facts are taken as evidence that per° possesses endogenous oscillators and that the per gene product is not concerned with central clock structures but rather might be responsible for the mutual coupling between the individual oscillators in a multioscillatory system controlling locomotor activity.


2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
CHARLOTTE HELFRICH-FÖRSTER ◽  
JÖRG WULF ◽  
J. STEVEN DE BELLE

1997 ◽  
Vol 48 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willem Scharloo ◽  
Gerdien De Jong ◽  
Estelle J.K. Noach

2006 ◽  
Vol 127 (7) ◽  
pp. 610-617 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.J. Vermeulen ◽  
T.I.F.H. Cremers ◽  
B.H.C. Westerink ◽  
L. Van De Zande ◽  
R. Bijlsma

1992 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 125-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roland Strauss ◽  
Ulrike Hanesch ◽  
Martin Kinkelin ◽  
Reinhard Wolf ◽  
Martin Heisenberg

2002 ◽  
Vol 89 (11) ◽  
pp. 512-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Sheeba ◽  
M. Chandrashekaran ◽  
Amitabh Joshi ◽  
Vijay Sharma

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document