Motor pattern switching in the heartbeat pattern generator of the medicinal leech: membrane properties and lack of synaptic interaction in switch interneurons

1999 ◽  
Vol 184 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Lu ◽  
S. Gramoll ◽  
J. Schmidt ◽  
R. L. Calabrese
1983 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-82
Author(s):  
P. S. Dickinson ◽  
F. Nagy

In the isolated stomatogastric nervous system of the lobster Fasus lalandii, the strong modifications of the pyloric motor pattern induced by firing of the single anterior pyloric modulator neurone (APM) are due primarily to modulation by APM activity of the regenerative membrane properties which are responsible for the ‘burstiness’ of all the pyloric neurones and particularly of the non-pacemaker neurones (constrictor motoneurones). This modulation has been studied under experimental conditions where the main extrinsic influences usually received by the pyloric constrictor neurones (intra-network synaptic interactions, activity of pacemaker neurones, and phasic central inputs from two premotor centres) are minimal. Under these conditions a brief discharge of neurone APM induces long plateaus of firing in all of the pyloric neurones. The non-pacemaker neurones of the pyloric network are not simply passive follower neurones, but can produce regenerative depolarizations (plateau potentials) during which the neurones fire spikes. The ability of the pyloric constrictor neurones to produce plateau potentials (plateau properties) contributes greatly to the generation of the rhythmical pyloric motor pattern. When these neurones spontaneously express their plateau properties, firing of neurone APM amplifies these properties. When most of the central inputs usually received by the pyloric constrictor neurones are experimentally suppressed, these neurones can no longer produce plateau potentials. In such conditions, firing of the single modulatory neurone APM can reinduce plateau properties of the pyloric constrictor neurones. In addition, firing in APM neurone slows down the active repolarization phase which terminates the plateau potentials of pyloric constrictor neurones. This effect is long-lasting and voltage-dependent. Modulation by APM of the plateau properties of the pyloric neurones also changes the sensitivity of these neurones to synaptic inputs. This effect can explain the strong modifications that an APM discharge exerts on a current pyloric motor pattern. Moreover, it might render the motoneurones of the pyloric pattern generator more sensitive to inputs from a command oscillator, and contribute to switching on the pyloric motor pattern.


1982 ◽  
Vol 48 (4) ◽  
pp. 914-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. F. Russell ◽  
D. K. Hartline

1. Neurons in the central pattern generator for the "pyloric" motor rhythm of the lobster stomatogastric ganglion were investigated for the possible involvement of regenerative membrane properties in their membrane-potential oscillations and bursting output patterns. 2. Evidence was found that each class of pyloric-system neurons can possess a capability for generating prolonged regenerative depolarizations by a voltage-dependent membrane mechanism. Such responses have been termed plateau potentials. 3. Several tests were applied to determine whether a given cell possessed a plateau capability. First among these was the ability to trigger all-or-none bursts of nerve impulses by brief depolarizing current pulses and to terminate bursts in an all-or-none fashion with brief hyperpolarizing current pulses. Tests were made under conditions of a high level of activity in the pyloric generator, often in conjunction with the use of hyperpolarizing offsets to the cell under test to suppress ongoing bursting. 4. For each class, the network of synaptic interconnections among the pyloric-system neurons was shown to not be the cause of the regenerative responses observed. 5. Plateau potentials are viewed as a driving force for axon spiking during bursts and as interacting with the synaptic network in the formation of the pyloric motor pattern.


1999 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 950-953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralph A. DiCaprio

Gating of afferent input by a central pattern generator. Intracellular recordings from the sole proprioceptor (the oval organ) in the crab ventilatory system show that the nonspiking afferent fibers from this organ receive a cyclic hyperpolarizing inhibition in phase with the ventilatory motor pattern. Although depolarizing and hyperpolarizing current pulses injected into a single afferent will reset the ventilatory motor pattern, the inhibitory input is of sufficient magnitude to block afferent input to the ventilatory central pattern generator (CPG) for ∼50% of the cycle period. It is proposed that this inhibitory input serves to gate sensory input to the ventilatory CPG to provide an unambiguous input to the ventilatory CPG.


1985 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. H. Paul ◽  
B. Mulloney

We describe a type of nonspiking premotor local interneuron (interneuron IA) in the abdominal nervous system of Pacifasticus leniusculus. All of its branches are restricted to one side of the midline. These interneurons are identifiable and occur as bilateral pairs, one neuron on each side of abdominal ganglia 3, 4, and 5. The membrane potential of interneuron IA oscillated in phase with the swimmeret rhythm, a motor pattern generated in each of these ganglia, because the neuron received postsynaptic potentials in phase with the rhythm. Sustained hyperpolarization of an individual interneuron IA initiated generation of the swimmeret rhythm in all the ganglia of a quiescent nervous system. Sustained depolarization stopped the swimmeret rhythm in all the active ganglia of a nervous system that was generating the rhythm. Currents injected into one interneuron reset the rhythm. Comparisons of the shapes of the IA interneurons in different ganglia showed that they are similar to each other and distinct from other local interneurons in these ganglia. Interneuron IA has a large integrative segment and relatively few branches that are largely restricted to the lateral neuropil, to which all other kinds of swimmeret neurons also project. We conclude that this interneuron occurs only once in each hemiganglion in abdominal segments 3, 4, and 5, and that it is identifiable. Furthermore, this interneuron is an essential component of the circuit in each hemiganglion that generates the swimmeret rhythm. The interneuron was dye coupled to a particular identifiable motor neuron and not to any other neurons. The motor neuron was not dye-coupled to any other local interneurons. The ability of this motor neuron to reset the rhythm is attributed to its being electrically coupled to interneuron IA in its ganglion.


1992 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 1683-1692 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Wittenberg ◽  
W. B. Kristan

1. To understand how a multisegmental animal coordinates motor activity over more than one segment, we studied shortening behavior in the medicinal leech, in which several segments contract longitudinally in response to a moderately strong mechanical stimulus. 2. We first demonstrated that the neuronal activity responsible for shortening behavior occurred in semi-intact and isolated nerve cord preparations, and then characterized the responses of motor neurons in isolated preparations. The motor output during shortening was simultaneous excitation of motor neurons innervating dorsal longitudinal muscle and of motor neurons innervating ventral longitudinal muscle. 3. The stronger the stimulus, the more segments produced the shortening motor output, with the segments nearest the stimulus recruited first. 4. Although the shortening response was produced in several segments near the site of stimulation, it was never produced in the stimulated segment, where the local bending motor output pattern was produced. The motor pattern suggests that shortening, initially considered a very simple behavior, requires the involvement of at least few segmentally iterated interneurons.


2003 ◽  
Vol 89 (4) ◽  
pp. 2120-2136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Itay Hurwitz ◽  
Irving Kupfermann ◽  
Klaudiusz R. Weiss

Consummatory feeding movements in Aplysia californica are organized by a central pattern generator (CPG) in the buccal ganglia. Buccal motor programs similar to those organized by the CPG are also initiated and controlled by the cerebro-buccal interneurons (CBIs), interneurons projecting from the cerebral to the buccal ganglia. To examine the mechanisms by which CBIs affect buccal motor programs, we have explored systematically the synaptic connections from three of the CBIs (CBI-1, CBI-2, CBI-3) to key buccal ganglia CPG neurons (B31/B32, B34, and B63). The CBIs were found to produce monosynaptic excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) with both fast and slow components. In this report, we have characterized only the fast component. CBI-2 monosynaptically excites neurons B31/B32, B34, and B63, all of which can initiate motor programs when they are sufficiently stimulated. However, the ability of CBI-2 to initiate a program stems primarily from the excitation of B63. In B31/B32, the size of the EPSPs was relatively small and the threshold for excitation was very high. In addition, preventing firing in either B34 or B63 showed that only a block in B63 firing prevented CBI-2 from initiating programs in response to a brief stimulus. The connections from CBI-2 to the buccal ganglia neurons showed a prominent facilitation. The facilitation contributed to the ability of CBI-2 to initiate a BMP and also led to a change in the form of the BMP. The cholinergic blocker hexamethonium blocked the fast EPSPs induced by CBI-2 in buccal ganglia neurons and also blocked the EPSPs between a number of key CPG neurons within the buccal ganglia. CBI-2 and B63 were able to initiate motor patterns in hexamethonium, although the form of a motor pattern was changed, indicating that non-hexamethonium-sensitive receptors contribute to the ability of these cells to initiate bursts. By contrast to CBI-2, CBI-1 excited B63 but inhibited B34. CBI-3 excited B34 and not B63. The data indicate that CBI-1, -2, and -3 are components of a system that initiates and selects between buccal motor programs. Their behavioral function is likely to depend on which combination of CBIs and CPG elements are activated.


eLife ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Wenning ◽  
Brian J Norris ◽  
Cengiz Günay ◽  
Daniel Kueh ◽  
Ronald L Calabrese

Rhythmic behaviors vary across individuals. We investigated the sources of this output variability across a motor system, from the central pattern generator (CPG) to the motor plant. In the bilaterally symmetric leech heartbeat system, the CPG orchestrates two coordinations in the bilateral hearts with different intersegmental phase relations (Δϕ) and periodic side-to-side switches. Population variability is large. We show that the system is precise within a coordination, that differences in repetitions of a coordination contribute little to population output variability, but that differences between bilaterally homologous cells may contribute to some of this variability. Nevertheless, much output variability is likely associated with genetic and life history differences among individuals. Variability of Δϕ were coordination-specific: similar at all levels in one, but significantly lower for the motor pattern than the CPG pattern in the other. Mechanisms that transform CPG output to motor neurons may limit output variability in the motor pattern.


2002 ◽  
Vol 87 (3) ◽  
pp. 1572-1585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark A. Masino ◽  
Ronald L. Calabrese

Motor pattern generating networks that produce segmentally distributed motor outflow are often portrayed as a series of coupled segmental oscillators that produce a regular progression (constant phase differences) in their rhythmic activity. The leech heartbeat central pattern generator is paced by a core timing network, which consists of two coupled segmental oscillators in segmental ganglia 3 and 4. The segmental oscillators comprise paired mutually inhibitory oscillator interneurons and the processes of intersegmental coordinating interneurons. As a first step in understanding the coordination of segmental motor outflow by this pattern generator, we describe the functional synaptic interactions, and activity and phase relationships of the heart interneurons of the timing network, in isolated nerve cord preparations. In the timing network, most (∼75%) of the coordinating interneuron action potentials were generated at a primary spike initiation site located in ganglion 4 (G4). A secondary spike initiation site in ganglion 3 (G3) became active in the absence of activity at the primary site. Generally, the secondary site was characterized by a reluctance to burst and a lower spike frequency, when compared with the primary site. Oscillator interneurons in G3 inhibited spike activity at both initiation sites, whereas oscillator interneurons in G4 inhibited spike activity only at the primary initiation site. This asymmetry in the control of spike activity in the coordinating interneurons may account for the observation that the phase of the coordinating interneurons is more tightly linked to the G3 than G4 oscillator interneurons. The cycle period of the timing network and the phase difference between the ipsilateral G3 and G4 oscillator interneurons were regular within individual preparations, but varied among preparations. This variation in phase differences observed across preparations implies that modulated intrinsic membrane and synaptic properties, rather than the pattern of synaptic connections, are instrumental in determining phase within the timing network.


1982 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 195-211
Author(s):  
ANDREW D. McCLELLAN

Feeding, regurgitation, and rejection in the marine gastropod Pleurobranchaea all involve similar but not identical rhythmic movements of buccal mass structures such as the radula, jaws and lips. The part of the motor pattern which produces rhythmic radula movement, as recorded in the major external muscles of the buccal mass of behaving semi-intact preparations, was similar during the three different types of behaviour, suggesting that they share a common motor-pattern generator. Other parts of the motor pattern were only obviously different during the vomiting phase of regurgitation. Differences in the function and motor patterns of feeding and rejection are presumably accounted for by differences in the activity of muscles which could not be recorded from in this study (e.g. jaw muscles). A general conclusion is that buccal rhythms in gastropods cannot automatically be assumed to underlie feeding, and this is particularly true for dissected preparations which do not execute a clear behavioural response. It would be necessary either to record motor activity that is unique for a given behaviour, or to employ preparations which execute unambiguous behavioural responses.


2000 ◽  
Vol 203 (22) ◽  
pp. 3505-3512 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.J. Wilson ◽  
M.B. Harris ◽  
J.E. Remmers ◽  
S.F. Perry

While little is known of the origin of air-breathing in vertebrates, primitive air breathers can be found among extant lobe-finned (Sarcopterygii) and ray-finned (Actinopterygii) fish. The descendents of Sarcopterygii, the tetrapods, generate lung ventilation using a central pattern generator, the activity of which is modulated by central and peripheral CO(2)/H(+) chemoreception. Air-breathing in Actinopterygii, in contrast, has been considered a ‘reflexive’ behaviour with little evidence for central CO(2)/H(+) respiratory chemoreceptors. Here, we describe experiments using an in vitro brainstem preparation of a primitive air-breathing actinopterygian, the longnose gar Lepisosteus osseus. Our data suggest (i) that gill and air-breathing motor patterns can be produced autonomously by the isolated brainstem, and (ii) that the frequency of the air-breathing motor pattern is increased by hypercarbia. These results are the first evidence consistent with the presence of an air-breathing central pattern generator with central CO(2)/H(+) respiratory chemosensitivity in any primitive actinopterygian fish. We speculate that the origin of the central neuronal controller for air-breathing preceded the divergence of the sarcopterygian and actinopterygian lineages and dates back to a common air-breathing ancestor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document