Handling Missing Data in Item Response Theory. Assessing the Accuracy of a Multiple Imputation Procedure Based on Latent Class Analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabella Sulis ◽  
Mariano Porcu
Keyword(s):  
Missing Data ◽  
Item Response Theory ◽  
Latent Class Analysis ◽  
Multiple Imputation ◽  
Item Response ◽  
Latent Class ◽  
Class Analysis ◽  
Response Theory ◽  
Imputation Procedure

scholarly journals Recursive Partitioning Methods for Data Imputation in the Context of Item Response Theory: A Monte Carlo Simulation

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julianne M. Edwards ◽  
W. Holmes Finch
Keyword(s):  
Missing Data ◽  
Item Response Theory ◽  
Multiple Imputation ◽  
Item Response ◽  
Missing Values ◽  
Recursive Partitioning ◽  
Data Imputation ◽  
Response Theory ◽  
Imputation Methods ◽  
Missing Responses

AbstractMissing data is a common problem faced by psychometricians and measurement professionals. To address this issue, there are a number of techniques that have been proposed to handle missing data regarding Item Response Theory. These methods include several types of data imputation methods - corrected item mean substitution imputation, response function imputation, multiple imputation, and the EM algorithm, as well as approaches that do not rely on the imputation of missing values - treating the item as not presented, coding missing responses as incorrect, or as fractionally correct. Of these methods, even though multiple imputation has demonstrated the best performance in prior research, higher MAE was still present. Given this higher model parameter estimation MAE for even the best performing missing data methods, this simulation study’s goal was to explore the performance of a set of potentially promising data imputation methods based on recursive partitioning. Results of this study demonstrated that approaches that combine multivariate imputation by chained equations and recursive partitioning algorithms yield data with relatively low estimation MAE for both item difficulty and item discrimination. Implications of these findings are discussed.

Clustering students according to their proficiency: a comparison between different approaches based on item response theory models

2021 ◽  
pp. 43-48
Author(s):  
Rosa Fabbricatore ◽  
Francesco Palumbo
Keyword(s):  
Item Response Theory ◽  
Item Response ◽  
Clustering Algorithm ◽  
Latent Class ◽  
Latent Class Models ◽  
Response Theory ◽  
Homogeneous Groups ◽  
Final Grade ◽  
Irt Model ◽  
Irt Models

Evaluating learners' competencies is a crucial concern in education, and home and classroom structured tests represent an effective assessment tool. Structured tests consist of sets of items that can refer to several abilities or more than one topic. Several statistical approaches allow evaluating students considering the items in a multidimensional way, accounting for their structure. According to the evaluation's ending aim, the assessment process assigns a final grade to each student or clusters students in homogeneous groups according to their level of mastery and ability. The latter represents a helpful tool for developing tailored recommendations and remediations for each group. At this aim, latent class models represent a reference. In the item response theory (IRT) paradigm, the multidimensional latent class IRT models, releasing both the traditional constraints of unidimensionality and continuous nature of the latent trait, allow to detect sub-populations of homogeneous students according to their proficiency level also accounting for the multidimensional nature of their ability. Moreover, the semi-parametric formulation leads to several advantages in practice: It avoids normality assumptions that may not hold and reduces the computation demanding. This study compares the results of the multidimensional latent class IRT models with those obtained by a two-step procedure, which consists of firstly modeling a multidimensional IRT model to estimate students' ability and then applying a clustering algorithm to classify students accordingly. Regarding the latter, parametric and non-parametric approaches were considered. Data refer to the admission test for the degree course in psychology exploited in 2014 at the University of Naples Federico II. Students involved were N=944, and their ability dimensions were defined according to the domains assessed by the entrance exam, namely Humanities, Reading and Comprehension, Mathematics, Science, and English. In particular, a multidimensional two-parameter logistic IRT model for dichotomously-scored items was considered for students' ability estimation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document