Cavitation bubble behavior and bubble-shock wave interaction near a gelatin surface as a study of in vivo bubble dynamics

2000 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 139-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Kodama ◽  
Y. Tomita
Keyword(s):  
Shock Wave ◽  
Cavitation Bubble ◽  
Bubble Dynamics ◽  
Wave Interaction ◽  
Bubble Behavior ◽  
Shock Wave Interaction

Shock wave interaction with cavitation bubble clusters generated in lithotripsy.

2009 ◽  
Vol 125 (4) ◽  
pp. 2622-2622
Author(s):  
Derek C. Thomas ◽  
Todd A. Hay ◽  
Mark F. Hamilton
Keyword(s):  
Shock Wave ◽  
Cavitation Bubble ◽  
Wave Interaction ◽  
Shock Wave Interaction

SHOCK WAVE INTERACTION NEAR A CYLINDER ALIGNED NORMAL TO A BLUNTED PLATE—PART I: GAS FLOW AND HEAT TRANSFER ON A PLATE NEAR A CYLINDER

2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-118
Author(s):  
Volf Ya. Borovoy ◽  
Vladimir Evguenyevich Mosharov ◽  
Vladimir Nikolaevich Radchenko ◽  
Arkadii Sergeyevich Skuratov
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Shock Wave ◽  
Gas Flow ◽  
Wave Interaction ◽  
Shock Wave Interaction ◽  
Flow And Heat Transfer

Protecting shield influence on pressure decrease at shock wave interaction with the wall

2016 ◽  
Vol 54 (6) ◽  
pp. 905-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. A. Mirova ◽  
A. L. Kotel’nikov ◽  
V. V. Golub ◽  
T. V. Bazhenova
Keyword(s):  
Shock Wave ◽  
Wave Interaction ◽  
Shock Wave Interaction ◽  
Pressure Decrease

Existence of a new type of irregular shock-wave interaction

1988 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 795-797
Author(s):  
M. D. Gerasimov ◽  
A. V. Panasenko ◽  
V. F. Yatsuk
Keyword(s):  
Shock Wave ◽  
Wave Interaction ◽  
Shock Wave Interaction ◽  
New Type

scholarly journals Intraocular Pressure Study in Ex Vivo Pig Eyes by the Laser-Induced Cavitation Technique: Toward a Non-Contact Intraocular Pressure Sensor

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 2281
Author(s):  
Santiago Camacho-Lopez ◽  
Carlos Andrés Zuñiga-Romero ◽  
Luis Felipe Devia-Cruz ◽  
Carolina Alvarez-Delgado ◽  
Marcos Antonio Plata-Sanchez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intraocular Pressure ◽  
Cavitation Bubble ◽  
Bubble Dynamics ◽  
Continuous Wave ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Applanation Tonometry ◽  
Reliable Technique ◽  
Measurement Resolution ◽  
In Vivo Diagnosis

Traditional applanation tonometry techniques lack the necessary accuracy and reliability for measuring the intraocular pressure (IOP), and there is still a need for a reliable technique for in vivo diagnosis. A single laser-induced cavitation bubble event was optically monitored in order to precisely measure the first collapse time of the cavitation bubble, which presents a direct dependence on the liquid pressure. This can certainly be done within the IOP range. We now extend the partial transmittance modulation (STM) technique to determine its feasibility for directly measuring the IOP by studying the nanosecond (ns) pulsed laser-induced cavitation bubble dynamics for an externally pressurized fresh ex vivo porcine eye. The results demonstrate that it is possible to monitor the IOP by detecting the light of a continuous-wave (CW) laser beam which is intensity modulated by the bubble itself. This technique currently presents a measurement resolution of about 4 mmHg in the 5 to 50 mmHg pressure range, indicating the feasibility of this approach for measuring IOP. This technique provides a direct measurement within the anterior eye chamber, avoiding common pitfalls in IOP diagnosis, such as errors due to patient movement, varying physical properties of the eye globe, or central cornea thickness (CCT) effects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document