A Group I Intron in the Nuclear Small Subunit Ribosomal DNA of Gaeumannomyces graminis

2000 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 291-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanafy M. Fouly ◽  
Henry T. Wilkinson
Keyword(s):  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Group I Intron ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Gaeumannomyces Graminis ◽  
Group I ◽  
Small Subunit Ribosomal Dna

Systematic status of Campydora Cobb, 1920 (Nematoda: Campydorina)

Nematology ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 699-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Mullin ◽  
Timothy Harris ◽  
Thomas Powers
Keyword(s):  
Maximum Likelihood ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Maximum Parsimony ◽  
Phylogenetic Analyses ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Systematic Position ◽  
Nominal Species ◽  
Competing Hypotheses ◽  
Small Subunit Ribosomal Dna

AbstractThe systematic position of Campydora Cobb, 1920, which possesses many unique morphological features, especially in pharyngeal structure and stomatal armature, has long been a matter of uncertainty with the 'position of the Campydorinae' (containing only Campydora) being questionable. A review of the morphology of C. demonstrans, the only nominal species of Campydora concluded that the species warranted placement as the sole member of a monotypic suborder, Campydorina, in the order Dorylaimida. Others placed Campydorina in the order Enoplida. We conducted phylogenetic analyses, using 18s small subunit ribosomal DNA sequences generated from a number of taxa in the subclasses Enoplia and Dorylaimia, to evaluate these competing hypotheses. Although precise taxonomic placement of the genus Campydora and the identity of its closest living relatives is in need of further investigation, our analyses, under maximum parsimony, distance, and maximum likelihood criteria, unambiguously indicate that Campydora shares a common, more recent, ancestry with genera such as Alaimus, Pontonema, Tripyla and Ironus (Enoplida), rather than with any members of Dorylaimida, Mononchida or Triplonchida.

scholarly journals Comparative Studies on the Polymorphism and Copy Number Variation of mtSSU rDNA in Ciliates (Protista, Ciliophora): Implications for Phylogenetic, Environmental, and Ecological Research

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yurui Wang ◽  
Yaohan Jiang ◽  
Yongqiang Liu ◽  
Yuan Li ◽  
Laura A. Katz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Copy Number Variation ◽  
Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Copy Number ◽  
Sequence Variation ◽  
Small Subunit ◽  
Microbial Eukaryotes ◽  
Number Variation ◽  
Small Subunit Ribosomal Dna ◽  
Rdna Copy ◽  
Rdna Copy Number

While nuclear small subunit ribosomal DNA (nSSU rDNA) is the most commonly-used gene marker in studying phylogeny, ecology, abundance, and biodiversity of microbial eukaryotes, mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA (mtSSU rDNA) provides an alternative. Recently, both copy number variation and sequence variation of nSSU rDNA have been demonstrated for diverse organisms, which can contribute to misinterpretation of microbiome data. Given this, we explore patterns for mtSSU rDNA among 13 selected ciliates (representing five classes), a major component of microbial eukaryotes, estimating copy number and sequence variation and comparing to that of nSSU rDNA. Our study reveals: (1) mtSSU rDNA copy number variation is substantially lower than that for nSSU rDNA; (2) mtSSU rDNA copy number ranges from 1.0 × 104 to 8.1 × 105; (3) a most common sequence of mtSSU rDNA is also found in each cell; (4) the sequence variation of mtSSU rDNA are mainly indels in poly A/T regions, and only half of species have sequence variation, which is fewer than that for nSSU rDNA; and (5) the polymorphisms between haplotypes of mtSSU rDNA would not influence the phylogenetic topology. Together, these data provide more insights into mtSSU rDNA as a powerful marker especially for microbial ecology studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document