Optimum Treatment Strategy for Superficial Esophageal Cancer: Endoscopic Mucosal Resection versus Radical Esophagectomy

2001 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 424-431 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiromasa Fujita ◽  
Susumu Sueyoshi ◽  
Hideaki Yamana ◽  
Koji Shinozaki ◽  
Uhi Toh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Treatment Strategy ◽  
Superficial Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Radical Esophagectomy ◽  
Optimum Treatment ◽  
Mucosal Resection ◽  
Optimum Treatment Strategy

Risk factors for local recurrence of superficial esophageal cancer after treatment by endoscopic mucosal resection

Endoscopy ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 39 (01) ◽  
pp. 41-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Esaki ◽  
T. Matsumoto ◽  
K. Hirakawa ◽  
S. Nakamura ◽  
J. Umeno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Superficial Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Mucosal Resection

scholarly journals Should endoscopic mucosal resection be attempted for cT2N0 esophageal cancer?

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B Nelson ◽  
Kyle G Mitchell ◽  
Brian R Weston ◽  
Sonia Betancourt ◽  
Dipen Maru ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Superficial Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Mucosal Resection

SUMMARY Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) can be an effective therapy for superficial esophageal cancer. Many patients with cT2 invasion by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) receive surgery but are subsequently found to have superficial disease. The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety profile and the added value of attempting EMR for EUS-staged cT2N0 esophageal cancer. A retrospective review was performed at a single institution from 2008 to 2017. Patients who were staged cT2N0 by EUS were identified from a prospectively maintained surgical database. Among 75 patients identified for analysis, 30 underwent an attempt at EMR. No perforations or other immediate complications occurred. EMR was more likely to be attempted among older patients (P = 0.001) with smaller tumor size (P < 0.001) and diminished SUVmax (P = 0.001). At the time of treatment, EMR was successful in clearing all known disease among 17/30 patients, with 12 representing pT1a or less and 5 representing pT1b with negative margins. Among the 17 patients for whom EMR was able to clear all known disease, there were no recurrences or cancer-related deaths. Although all the patients were staged as cT2N0 by EUS, many patients were identified by EMR to have superficial disease. There were no perforations or other adverse events related to EMR. Furthermore, EMR cleared all known disease among 17 patients with no known recurrences or cancer-related deaths. The results indicate that EMR for cT2N0 esophageal cancer is a safe diagnostic option that is therapeutic for some.

Recurrence After Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Superficial Esophageal Cancer

Endoscopy ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 277-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Nomura ◽  
N. Boku ◽  
A. Ohtsu ◽  
M. Muto ◽  
S. Matsumoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Superficial Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Mucosal Resection

Endoscopic Surgery of the Broncho-esophageal Diseases. Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in Early Esophageal Cancer.

1996 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 150-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyasu Makuuchi ◽  
Hideo Shimada ◽  
Kyoichi Mizutani ◽  
Osamu Chino ◽  
Takao Machimura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Endoscopic Mucosal Resection ◽  
Endoscopic Surgery ◽  
Early Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Esophageal Diseases ◽  
Mucosal Resection

Determination of the optimum treatment strategy against the early blight of potato under epiphytotic conditions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Kuznetsova ◽  
I. A. Denisenkov ◽  
A. N. Rogozhin ◽  
T. I. Smetanina ◽  
V. N. Demidova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Strategy ◽  
Early Blight ◽  
Optimum Treatment ◽  
Optimum Treatment Strategy
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document