Radiographic Diagnosis of Early Colorectal Cancer, with Special Reference to the Superficial Type of Invasive Carcinoma

2000 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 1036-1046 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masakazu Maruyama ◽  
Koichi Koizumi ◽  
Shunkichi Kai ◽  
Akira Kazami ◽  
Takayoshi Handa
2000 ◽  
Vol 24 (9) ◽  
pp. 1075-1080 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoichi Ajioka ◽  
Hidenobu Watanabe ◽  
Shinsuke Kazama ◽  
Hideki Hashidate ◽  
Junji Yokoyama ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 49-64
Author(s):  
E. M. Bogdanova ◽  
Yu. L. Trubacheva ◽  
O. M. Yugai ◽  
S. V. Chernyshov ◽  
E. G. Rybakov ◽  
...  

AIM: to compare multiparametric endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) and enhanced imaging colonoscopy in the diagnosis of early colorectal cancer.PATIENTS AND METHODS: the study included 78 patients with epithelial rectal tumor. All the patients underwent multiparametric ERUS and colonoscopy with examination by narrow beam imaging (NBI) at optical magnification. All the patients were operated.RESULTS: a morphological examination removed specimens revealed adenomas in 48 cases, in 19 specimens – adenocarcinomas in situ and T1, and in 11 specimens – adenocarcinomas with invasion of the muscle layer or deeper. When calculating the accuracy indicators of diagnostic methods for groups of patients with adenoma, Tis-T1 adenocarcinoma, and T2-T3 adenocarcinoma, the difference in the sensitivity and specificity of the methods in none of the presented groups did not reach the level of statistical significance (p>0.05).ROC analysis showed that ultrasound has a prognostic value comparable to colonoscopy. The area difference was 0.013 (p=0.85).CONCLUSION: endoscopy and ultrasound have similar value in the diagnosis of malignant transformation of rectal adenomas.


2015 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. iv74
Author(s):  
M. Jameson ◽  
M. Arendse ◽  
M. Findlay ◽  
I. Bissett ◽  
S. Lolohea ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 86 (10) ◽  
pp. 1328-1331 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. A. Smith ◽  
K. A. Oien ◽  
P. J. O'Dwyer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document