Food supply differentially affects sibling negotiation and competition in the barn owl ( Tyto alba )

2001 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 514-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Roulin
Animals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (10) ◽  
pp. 1777
Author(s):  
Amélie N. Dreiss ◽  
Andrea Romano ◽  
Raphaëlle Flint ◽  
Sarah Bates ◽  
Aurélie Vermunt ◽  
...  

Animals produce vibrations or noises by means of body movements, which can play a role in communication. These behaviors enhance signal transmission or receiver attention and could be specifically used during turn-taking phases of a reciprocal exchange of signals. In the barn owl Tyto alba, nestlings vocalize one after the other to negotiate which individual will have priority access to the impending prey item to be delivered by the parents. Owlets adjust their vocalization to their own hunger level and to their siblings’ vocalization, withdrawing from the contest in front of highly vocal, and hence hungry, motivated nestmates. As sibling negotiation is a multicomponent display, we examined whether body movements could also be part of the negotiation process. To this end, we analyzed whether the vocalizations of one nestling affected its nestmate’s movements in three separate experiments: in natural nests, in the lab, and using a playback procedure. Nestling barn owls move in a variety of ways, such as repeated tapping of the floor with a foot, scratching the floor with claws, or flapping wings. Body movements were more frequent during the turn-taking phases of vocal interactions, when siblings emitted longer calls and at a greater rate. Once an individual monopolized vocal activity, siblings became less vocal and less active. Moreover, owlets produced more noisy body movements during the phases of vocal interactions which are crucial to prevail in negotiation. Non-vocal physical activities might reinforce vocal signals during sibling to sibling (sib–sib) interactions, or reflect owlets’ arousal, in the critical period during which they vocally settle which individual will dominate the competition.


2011 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 348-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlène A. Ruppli ◽  
Bettina Almasi ◽  
Amélie N. Dreiss ◽  
Marine Battesti ◽  
Lukas Jenni ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 39 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. M. Lekunze ◽  
A. U. Ezealor ◽  
T. Aken'ova
Keyword(s):  
Barn Owl ◽  

2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Safwan Saufi ◽  
Shakinah Ravindran ◽  
Hasber Salim
Keyword(s):  
Barn Owl ◽  

Author(s):  
Vivien Cosandey ◽  
Robin Séchaud ◽  
Paul Béziers ◽  
Yannick Chittaro ◽  
Andreas Sanchez ◽  
...  

AbstractBird nests are specialized habitats because of their particular composition including nest detritus and bird droppings. In consequence, they attract a specialized arthropod community considered as nidicolous, which includes species only found in bird nests (strictly nidicolous) or sometimes found in bird nests (facultatively nidicolous). Because the factors influencing the entomofauna in bird nests are poorly understood, in autumn 2019, we collected nest material in 86 Barn Owl (Tyto alba) nest boxes. We investigated whether the invertebrate species richness was related to Barn Owl nest box occupancy, the density of available nest boxes and the landscape structure. We found 3,321 nidicolous beetle specimens belonging to 24 species. Species richness of strictly nidicolous beetles was 2.7 times higher in nest boxes occupied by a family of Barn Owls the previous spring compared to unoccupied nest boxes. It was also higher in sites that were more often occupied by Barn Owls in the five previous years and in areas surrounded by a higher proportion of crop fields. For facultatively nidicolous beetles, the density of Barn Owl nest boxes enhanced the species richness. In conclusion, our study suggests that the strictly nidicolous beetles benefit from occupied nest boxes of Barn Owls, whereas facultatively nidicolous beetles look for nest boxes independently of whether Barn Owls occupy them. Our study highlights the importance of bird nests for a suite of invertebrates.


1981 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 181 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Valente

Vertebrate remains in a collection of barn owl (Tyto alba) pellets from south-western Queensland were largely those of mammals, including Rattus villosissimus, Mus musculus, Leggadina forresti, Planigale tenuirostris, Sminthopsis macroura and S. crassicaudata. R. villosissimus was the most common prey item. P. tenuirostris had not been recorded previously from the area. Other vertebrate remains included those of birds, lizards and frogs. Some insects were also found in the pellets.


2017 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolaos Kassinis ◽  
Alexandre Roulin
Keyword(s):  
Barn Owl ◽  

2013 ◽  
Vol 155 (1) ◽  
pp. 273-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Chausson ◽  
Isabelle Henry ◽  
Bettina Almasi ◽  
Alexandre Roulin

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document