The effect of antibiotics on clinical outcomes in immune-checkpoint blockade: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 343-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooke E. Wilson ◽  
Bertrand Routy ◽  
Adnan Nagrial ◽  
Venessa T. Chin
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade

scholarly journals Multi-Omics Analysis of the Anti-tumor Synergistic Mechanism and Potential Application of Immune Checkpoint Blockade Combined With Lenvatinib

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuting Lu ◽  
Jiangtao Jin ◽  
Qi Du ◽  
Min Hu ◽  
Yuhan Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Potential Application ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Pathway Enrichment Analysis ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Omics Analysis

The combination of immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) and lenvatinib has demonstrated robust clinical effects that are superior to those of monotherapies, but the synergistic anti-tumor mechanisms remain unclear. Exploring the synergistic molecular mechanisms and early identifying potential application have key importance for clinical therapeutics. We firstly systematically reviewed published data of ICB in combination with lenvatinib for the treatment of cancer by meta-analysis. A subsequent bioinformatics analysis explored the mechanism of combined ICB and lenvatinib therapy in 33 cancer types. Transcriptomic analysis was conducted by RNA-seq, and genomic analysis was performed on gene mutations and copy-number alteration data. Tumor-related pathways and tumor immune micro-environment (TIME) were also investigated. The meta-analysis showed a 38.0% objective response rate (ORR) and 79% disease control rate (DCR) for ICB combined with lenvatinib. Multi-omics analysis revealed that ICB and lenvatinib target genes were highly expressed and showed driving alterations in six specific malignancies. Pathway-enrichment analysis found target genes were implicated in tumor development, angiogenesis, and immunoregulatory associated pathways. This study verified the potential synergistic mechanisms of ICB combined with lenvatinib at transcriptomics, genomics, protein, and cellular levels and recognized nine tumor types had ≥ 2 positive treatment-related molecular characteristics, which might benefit particularly from this combined strategy. The findings would help to provide clinical insights and theoretical basis for optimizing of targeted therapy-immunotherapy combinations, and for guiding individualized precision-medicine approaches for cancer treatment.

Abstract 118: Right Bundle Branch Block and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmad Hazem ◽  
Sunita Sharma ◽  
Amit Sharma ◽  
Cameron Leitch ◽  
Roopalakshmi Sharadanant ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Cardiovascular Mortality ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Importance: Right bundle branch block (RBBB) is observed in approximately 5-14% of patients with heart failure (HF). Multiple observational studies have reported the association of RBBB with clinical outcomes in patients with HF. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prognostic significance of RBBB for patients with HF. Data Sources: We have systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science and Scopus through January 2014. Study Selection: Reviewers working independently and in duplicate screened all eligible abstracts that described all cause or cardiovascular mortality in patients with RBBB and HF. We excluded studies that reported unadjusted outcome, i.e.: unadjusted event rates. Knowledge synthesis: We pooled reported risk ratio and hazard ratio. Main Outcomes: All-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality (death). Results: We found 12 relevant observational studies enrolling over 38,000 patients. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Included studies had at least a moderate quality. Seven of those evaluated prognosis of patients with RBBB and heart failure. After a mean follow up period of 2.5 years (range: 1-5 years), RBBB was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of all-cause mortality compared to patients with heart failure but no BBB, RR 1.27, 95% CI (1.08-1.50), Figure 1. The other 5 studies evaluated CHF patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), comparing outcomes of patients with RBBB to those with LBBB. After a mean f/u period of 3 years, patients with RBBB were once again found to have an increased risk of all-cause mortality, RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.12-1.89. Conclusion and Relevance: RBBB in patients with HF is associated with higher all-cause mortality in comparison to patients without inter-ventricular conduction defects, as well as LBBB patients in patients undergoing CRT setting.

scholarly journals Diabetes, obesity, hypertension and risk of severe COVID-19: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. e051711
Author(s):  
Chaoyang Li ◽  
Nazrul Islam ◽  
Juan Pablo Gutierrez ◽  
Ben Lacey ◽  
Ronald L Moolenaar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Global Health ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Homeland Security ◽  
Observational Studies ◽  
Human Subjects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Academic Research ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
The Usa

IntroductionPrevious evidence from several countries, including China, Italy, Mexico, UK and the USA, indicates that among patients with confirmed COVID-19 who were hospitalised, diabetes, obesity and hypertension might be important risk factors for severe clinical outcomes. Several preliminary systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been conducted on one or more of these non-communicable diseases, but the findings have not been definitive, and recent evidence has become available from many more populations. Thus, we aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies to assess the relationship of diabetes, obesity and hypertension with severe clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19.Method and analysisWe will search 16 major databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Global Health, CAB Abstracts, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Academic Research Complete, Africa Wide Information, Scopus, PubMed Central, ProQuest Central, WHO Virtual Health Library, Homeland Security COVID-19 collection, SciFinder, Clinical Trials and Cochrane Library) for articles published between December 2019 and December 2020. We will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols 2016 guidelines for the design and reporting the results. We will include observational studies that assess the associations of pre-existing diabetes, obesity and hypertension in patients with COVID-19 with risk of severe clinical outcomes such as intensive care unit admission, receiving mechanical ventilation or death. Stata V.16.1 and R-Studio V.1.4.1103 statistical software will be used for statistical analysis. Meta-analysis will be used to estimate the pooled risks and to assess potential heterogeneities in risks.Ethics and disseminationThe study was reviewed for human subjects concerns by the US CDC Center for Global Health and determined to not represent human subjects research because it uses data from published studies. We plan to publish results in a peer-reviewed journal and present at national and international conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021204371.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document