Assessment of deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis in surgical patients: a study conducted at Nancy University Hospital, France

1998 ◽  
Vol 54 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 671-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Lepaux ◽  
C. Charpentier ◽  
J. P. Pertek ◽  
C. Pinelli ◽  
J. P. Delagoutte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Thrombosis Prophylaxis ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis ◽  
Deep Vein

Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis: Audit of Practice in General Surgical Patients in a Teaching Hospital

2000 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. Agu ◽  
A. Handa ◽  
G Hamilton ◽  
D. M. Baker
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
Thrombosis Prophylaxis ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Dvt Prophylaxis ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Deep Vein

Objective: To audit the prescription and implementation of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis in general surgical patients in a teaching hospital. Methods: All inpatients on three general surgical wards were audited for adequacy of prescription and implementation prophylaxis (audit A). A repeat audit 3 months later (audit B) closed the loop. The groups were compared using the chi-square test. Results: In audit A 50 patients participated. Prophylaxis was correctly prescribed in 36 (72%) and implemented in 30 (60%) patients. Eighteen patients at moderate or high risk (45%) received inadequate prophylaxis. Emergency admission, pre-operative stay and inadequate risk assignment were associated with poor implementation of protocol. In audit B 51 patients participated. Prescription was appropriate in 45 (88%) and implementation in 40 (78%) patients (p< 0.05). Eleven patients at moderate or high risk received inadequate prophylaxis. Seven of 11 high-risk patients in audit A (64%) received adequate prophylaxis, in contrast to all high-risk patients in audit B. The decision not to administer prophylaxis was deemed appropriate in 5 of 15 (30%) in audit A compared with 6 of 10 (60%) in audit B. Conclusion: Increased awareness, adequate risk assessment, updating of protocols and consistent reminders to staff and patients may improve implementation of DVT prophylaxis.

Deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis methods

AORN Journal ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 266
Author(s):  
Sharon A. Van Wicklin ◽  
Karen S. Ward ◽  
Shirley W. Cantrell
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Thrombosis Prophylaxis ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis ◽  
Deep Vein
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document