Human brain activation accompanying explicitly directed movement sequence learning

2001 ◽  
Vol 141 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-280 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Eliassen ◽  
Timothy Souza ◽  
Jerome Sanes
2006 ◽  
Vol 7 (S1) ◽  
pp. 116-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcella Brunetti ◽  
Paolo Belardinelli ◽  
Cosimo Del Gratta ◽  
Vittorio Pizzella ◽  
Stefania Della Penna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Nikolas Rose ◽  
Joelle M. Abi-Rached

This chapter discusses the use of animals to explore issues relating to human cognition, emotion, volition, and their pathologies. Researchers who use animal models in their work point to similarities in the genomes of the two species, in the structure of mouse and human brain, in patterns of brain activation, in neural mechanisms at the cellular and molecular level, in responses to drugs and so forth, perhaps with reference to evolution and the principle of conservation across species when it comes to the most basic aspects of living organisms, including their brains. The chapter then examines four interconnected themes: the question of the artificiality of the laboratory situation within which animal experiments are conducted; the idea of a model in behavioral and psychiatric research; the specificity of the human and the elision of history and human sociality; and the problem of translation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 462-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Merim Bilalić

The performance of experts seems almost effortless. The neural-efficiency hypothesis takes this into account, suggesting that because of practice and automatization of procedures, experts require fewer brain resources. Here, I argue that the way the brain accommodates complex skills does indeed have to do with the nature of experts’ performance. However, instead of exhibiting less brain activation, experts’ performance actually engages more brain areas. Behind the seemingly effortless performance of experts lies a complex cognitive system that relies on knowledge about the domain of expertise. Unlike novices, who need to execute one process at a time, experts are able to recognize an object, retrieve its function, and connect it to another object simultaneously. The expert brain deals with this computational burden by engaging not only specific brain areas in one hemisphere but also the same (homologous) area in the opposite hemisphere. This phenomenon, which I call the double take of expertise, has been observed in a number of expertise domains. I describe it here in object- and pattern-recognition tasks in the domain of chess. I also discuss the importance of the study of expertise for our understanding of the human brain in general.


1995 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 639-644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus-Dietmar Merboldt ◽  
Gunnar Krüger ◽  
Wolfgang Hänicke ◽  
Andreas Kleinschmidt ◽  
Jens Frahm

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document